Suppr超能文献

抗阻训练对血管内皮功能的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of resistance training on endothelial function: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.

School of Physical Education, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2021 Sep;333:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effects of resistance training on flow-mediated dilation (FMD), which has been the gold standard non-invasive assessment of endothelial function and is associated with the risk of cardiovascular events, are not well known. We conducted a systematic review to analyze the effects of resistance training on FMD.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscuss, Scopus, Web of Science and PEDro databases for studies that met the following criteria: (a) randomized controlled trials of resistance exercise with a comparative non-exercise group or contralateral untrained limb in adults and/or elderly; (b) studies that measured post-occlusion brachial artery FMD by ultrasonography, before and after intervention. Mean differences (MDs) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated using an inverse variance method with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 785 participants; 53 % females). Resistance training on FMD responses showed a favorable result for the resistance training group (n = 366) compared to the control group (n = 358) (MD 2.39, 95%CI 1.65, 3.14; p<0.00001). Subgroup analysis indicated favorable results for the dynamic resistance training (n = 545; MD 2.12, 95 % CI 1.26, 2.98; p<0.00001) and isometric handgrip training (n = 179; MD 3.32, 95 % CI 1.68, 4.96; p<0.0001) compared to the control group. The effect of resistance training on FMD responses was also favorable regardless of the condition of the participants (Healthy [n = 261]: MD 2.11, 95 % CI 1.04, 3.18; p<0.0001; Cardiovascular disease [n = 310]: MD 2.89, 95 % CI 0.88, 4.90; p = 0.005; metabolic disease [n = 153]: MD 2.40, 95 % CI 1.59, 3.21; p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance training improves FMD in healthy individuals and patients with cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.

摘要

背景与目的

血流介导的舒张(FMD)是内皮功能的金标准无创评估指标,与心血管事件风险相关,但目前尚不清楚抗阻训练对 FMD 的影响。我们进行了一项系统评价,以分析抗阻训练对 FMD 的影响。

方法

我们在 Pubmed、Embase、CINAHL、SPORTDiscuss、Scopus、Web of Science 和 PEDro 数据库中检索符合以下标准的研究:(a)在成年人和/或老年人中,将抗阻运动与对照非运动组或对侧未训练肢体进行比较的随机对照试验;(b)使用超声测量试验前后肱动脉 FMD 的研究。使用具有随机效应模型的逆方差法计算均数差值(MDs)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

共有 23 项研究纳入荟萃分析(n=785 名参与者;53%为女性)。与对照组(n=358)相比,抗阻训练组(n=366)的 FMD 反应表现出有利的结果(MD 2.39,95%CI 1.65,3.14;p<0.00001)。亚组分析表明,与对照组相比,动态抗阻训练(n=545;MD 2.12,95%CI 1.26,2.98;p<0.00001)和等长握力训练(n=179;MD 3.32,95%CI 1.68,4.96;p<0.0001)的效果更好。无论参与者的状况如何(健康[n=261]:MD 2.11,95%CI 1.04,3.18;p<0.0001;心血管疾病[n=310]:MD 2.89,95%CI 0.88,4.90;p=0.005;代谢疾病[n=153]:MD 2.40,95%CI 1.59,3.21;p<0.00001),抗阻训练对 FMD 反应的影响均是有利的。

结论

抗阻训练可改善健康个体以及心血管和代谢疾病患者的 FMD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验