Eagleton Sally G, Na Muzi, Savage Jennifer S
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Penn State College of Health and Human Development, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Penn State College of Health and Human Development, University Park, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pediatr Obes. 2022 Jan;17(1):e12837. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12837. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
Food insecurity (FI) may increase the odds for childhood obesity, yet little is known about the mechanism explaining this relationship. Parents experience greater psychosocial stress in the context of FI. In these environments, children from FI households may exhibit different appetitive behaviours.
To examine associations between FI and appetitive behaviours in children (3-5 years) and to explore whether social, emotional and structural properties of the home environment moderate this relationship.
In a low-income sample of 504 parent-child dyads, parents completed the household food security module and the Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire. A subsample (n = 361) self-reported perceived stress, depressive symptoms, household chaos and family functioning. Children were categorized as food secure, household FI and child FI.
Food responsiveness (LSmeans ± SE; child FI: 2.56 ± 0.13; food secure: 2.31 ± 0.10, p < 0.05) and emotional overeating (LSmeans ± SE; child FI: 1.69 ± 0.10; food secure: 1.48 ± 0.08, p < 0.05) were higher among children in the child FI group compared to the food secure group. Child FI was only associated with higher food responsiveness among children of parents reporting high levels of perceived stress (p = 0.04) and low levels of family functioning (p = 0.01). There were no differences in food responsiveness by food security status at mean or low levels of perceived stress or at mean or high levels of family functioning (p > 0.05).
Child FI may contribute to obesity risk through differences in appetitive behaviours. For low-income families, stress management and improving family dynamics may be important factors for interventions designed to improve children's appetitive behaviours.
粮食不安全(FI)可能会增加儿童肥胖的几率,但对于解释这种关系的机制知之甚少。在FI的背景下,父母会经历更大的心理社会压力。在这些环境中,来自FI家庭的儿童可能会表现出不同的饮食行为。
研究FI与3至5岁儿童饮食行为之间的关联,并探讨家庭环境的社会、情感和结构特征是否会调节这种关系。
在一个由504对亲子组成的低收入样本中,父母完成了家庭粮食安全模块和儿童饮食行为问卷。一个子样本(n = 361)自我报告了感知压力、抑郁症状、家庭混乱和家庭功能。将儿童分为粮食安全组、家庭FI组和儿童FI组。
与粮食安全组相比,儿童FI组儿童的食物反应性(最小二乘均值±标准误;儿童FI组:2.56±0.13;粮食安全组:2.31±0.10,p < 0.05)和情绪性暴饮暴食(最小二乘均值±标准误;儿童FI组:1.69±0.10;粮食安全组:1.48±0.08,p < 0.05)更高。仅在报告高感知压力水平(p = 0.04)和低家庭功能水平(p = 0.01)的父母的子女中,儿童FI与较高的食物反应性相关。在感知压力的平均或低水平以及家庭功能的平均或高水平下,按粮食安全状况划分的食物反应性没有差异(p > 0.05)。
儿童FI可能通过饮食行为的差异导致肥胖风险。对于低收入家庭,压力管理和改善家庭动态可能是旨在改善儿童饮食行为的干预措施的重要因素。