• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于白蛋白-胆红素-血小板评分预测代偿期肝硬化患者的高危食管静脉曲张。

Prediction of high-risk esophageal varices in patients with compensated cirrhosis using albumin-bilirubin-platelet score.

机构信息

Tropical Medicine Department.

Internal Medicine department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar 1;34(3):332-337. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002270.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002270
PMID:34402476
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that endoscopy is the gold standard for screening of high-risk varices (HRVs) in patients with compensated cirrhosis, it is invasive, costly and not necessary for all patients. So, noninvasive tests can replace endoscopy. We aimed at evaluating the albumin-bilirubin-platelet (ALBL-PLT) score as a noninvasive test in predicting HRVs in compensated cirrhotic patients versus Baveno VI and extended Baveno VI criteria.

METHODS

patients with compensated cirrhosis (n = 204) were included. Laboratory parameters, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography were done. Classification of patients according to the status of HRVs was done. We compared both groups on the basis of ALBL-PLT score, Baveno VI and extended Baveno VI criteria.

RESULTS

Among the total patients, 96/204 (47%) patients had HRVs. They have higher liver stiffness measurement than those without HRVs (33 ± 13.1 versus 19.3 ± 8.25, CI, -19.94, -7.31, P value <0.001). Also, all HRVs patients have an ALBL-PLT score of more than 3. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ALBL-PLT score is higher than that for Baveno VI and extended Baveno VI criteria (0.894 versus 0.722 and 0.792, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ALBL-PLT score of more than three has a good predictive value in predicting HRVs among compensated cirrhotic patients.

摘要

背景

尽管内镜检查是筛查代偿性肝硬化患者高危静脉曲张(HRVs)的金标准,但它具有侵袭性、成本高,并非所有患者都需要。因此,可以使用非侵入性检查来替代内镜检查。我们旨在评估白蛋白-胆红素-血小板(ALBL-PLT)评分作为一种非侵入性检查,用于预测代偿性肝硬化患者的 HRVs 与 Baveno VI 和扩展 Baveno VI 标准相比。

方法

纳入了 204 例代偿性肝硬化患者。进行了实验室参数、食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和瞬时弹性成像的肝硬度测量。根据 HRVs 的情况对患者进行分类。我们根据 ALBL-PLT 评分、Baveno VI 和扩展 Baveno VI 标准对两组进行了比较。

结果

在所有患者中,96/204(47%)例患者存在 HRVs。他们的肝硬度测量值高于无 HRVs 的患者(33 ± 13.1 与 19.3 ± 8.25,CI,-19.94,-7.31,P 值<0.001)。此外,所有 HRVs 患者的 ALBL-PLT 评分均大于 3。ALBL-PLT 评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积高于 Baveno VI 和扩展 Baveno VI 标准(分别为 0.894 与 0.722 和 0.792)。

结论

ALBL-PLT 评分大于 3 对预测代偿性肝硬化患者的 HRVs 具有良好的预测价值。

相似文献

1
Prediction of high-risk esophageal varices in patients with compensated cirrhosis using albumin-bilirubin-platelet score.基于白蛋白-胆红素-血小板评分预测代偿期肝硬化患者的高危食管静脉曲张。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar 1;34(3):332-337. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002270.
2
Liver stiffness and serum markers for excluding high-risk varices in patients who do not meet Baveno VI criteria.在不符合 Baveno VI 标准的患者中,通过肝硬度和血清标志物来排除高危静脉曲张。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 21;25(35):5323-5333. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i35.5323.
3
A combined model based on spleen stiffness measurement and Baveno VI criteria to rule out high-risk varices in advanced chronic liver disease.基于脾脏硬度测量和 Baveno VI 标准的联合模型排除晚期慢性肝病高危静脉曲张。
J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):308-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Non-invasive prediction of esophageal varices by stiffness and platelet in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease cirrhosis.非酒精性脂肪性肝病肝硬化通过硬度和血小板对食管静脉曲张的无创预测。
J Hepatol. 2018 Oct;69(4):878-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
VariScreen secures the screening of high-risk varices in patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis beyond Baveno VI criteria.VariScreen可对超出巴韦诺VI标准的乙型肝炎病毒相关性肝硬化患者的高危静脉曲张进行筛查。
Front Physiol. 2022 Sep 27;13:1006657. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1006657. eCollection 2022.
6
Performance of Baveno VI and Expanded Baveno VI Criteria for Excluding High-Risk Varices in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Baveno VI 和扩展的 Baveno VI 标准在慢性肝病患者中排除高危静脉曲张的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;17(9):1744-1755.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.062. Epub 2019 May 8.
7
The Combination of Shear Wave Elastography and Platelet Counts Can Effectively Predict High-Risk Varices in Patients with Hepatitis B-Related Cirrhosis.剪切波弹性成像与血小板计数联合应用可有效预测乙型肝炎相关性肝硬化患者高危食管胃静脉曲张。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Apr 7;2021:6635963. doi: 10.1155/2021/6635963. eCollection 2021.
8
Validation of original, expanded Baveno VI, and stepwise & platelet-MELD criteria to rule out varices needing treatment in compensated cirrhosis from various etiologies.验证原始、扩展的 Baveno VI 标准以及逐步和血小板-MELD 标准,以排除各种病因导致的代偿性肝硬化中需要治疗的静脉曲张。
Ann Hepatol. 2020 Mar-Apr;19(2):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Identifying Patients With Cirrhosis Who Might Avoid Screening Endoscopy Based on Serum Albumin and Bilirubin and Platelet Counts.基于血清白蛋白、胆红素和血小板计数识别可能避免筛查性内镜检查的肝硬化患者。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;19(1):199-201.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
Baveno VI criteria and spleen stiffness measurement rule out high-risk varices in virally suppressed HBV-related cirrhosis.Baveno VI 标准和脾脏硬度测量可排除病毒抑制的乙型肝炎病毒相关肝硬化中的高危静脉曲张。
J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):584-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of platelets-to-spleen diameter ratio for esophagogastric varices in hepatitis B virus-induced cirrhosis.血小板与脾脏直径比值对乙型肝炎病毒所致肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张的预测价值
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):3769-3777. doi: 10.62347/XQUE3108. eCollection 2024.
2
VariScreen secures the screening of high-risk varices in patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis beyond Baveno VI criteria.VariScreen可对超出巴韦诺VI标准的乙型肝炎病毒相关性肝硬化患者的高危静脉曲张进行筛查。
Front Physiol. 2022 Sep 27;13:1006657. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1006657. eCollection 2022.