• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

服务提供点和个体特征与现代避孕方法的采用相关:一项多国家纵向分析。

Service delivery point and individual characteristics associated with the adoption of modern contraceptive: A multi-country longitudinal analysis.

机构信息

Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Research Triangle Institute International, Health Care Financing and Payment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 17;16(8):e0254775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254775. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0254775
PMID:34403428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8370635/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women who start using contraception ("adopters") are a key population for family planning goals, but little is known about characteristics that predict the adoption of contraception as opposed to current use. We used prospective data from women and facilities for five countries, (Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Kenya, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso) and identified baseline characteristics that predicted adoption of modern contraception in the short term.

METHODS

We used data from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Agile Project. PMA Agile administered service delivery point (SDP) client exit interview (CEI) surveys in urban sites of these five countries. Female clients responding to the CEI were asked for phone numbers that were used for a phone follow-up survey approximately four months later. For our analysis, we used data from the SDP and CEI baseline surveys, and the phone follow up to compare women who start using contraception during this period with those who remain non-users. We used characteristics of the facility and the woman at baseline to predict her contraception adoption in the future.

RESULTS

Discussing FP with a partner at baseline was associated with greater odds of adoption in DRC (OR 2.34; 95% CI 0.97-5.66), India (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.05-4.93), and Kenya (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.16-2.35). Women who discussed family planning with any staff member at the health facility had 1.72 greater odds (95% CI 1.13-2.67) of becoming an adopter in Nigeria. The odds of adoption were lower in Nigerian facilities that had a stockout (OR 0.66 95% CI 0.44-1.00) at baseline. Other characteristics associated with contraception adoption across settings were education, age, wealth, parity, and marital status.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of both the woman and the health facility were associated with adoption of modern contraception in the future. Some characteristics, like discussing family planning with a spouse, education, and parity, were associated with contraceptive adoption across settings. Other characteristics that predict contraceptive use, such as health facility measures, varied across countries.

摘要

背景

开始使用避孕措施的女性(使用者)是计划生育目标的关键人群,但对于哪些特征可预测她们会采用避孕措施而不是继续使用现有避孕方法,人们知之甚少。我们使用来自五个国家(刚果民主共和国、印度、肯尼亚、尼日利亚和布基纳法索)的妇女和医疗机构的前瞻性数据,确定了短期内在哪些方面的特征可以预测她们采用现代避孕方法。

方法

我们使用了绩效管理行动(PMA)敏捷项目的数据。PMA 敏捷在这五个国家的城市地点开展服务提供点(SDP)客户出口调查(CEI)。在 CEI 中对女性客户进行了回复,她们被要求提供电话号码,以便大约四个月后进行电话随访调查。在我们的分析中,我们使用了 SDP 和 CEI 基线调查以及电话随访的数据,将在此期间开始使用避孕措施的女性与继续未使用者进行比较。我们使用了基本情况中设施和女性的特征来预测她们未来的避孕措施采用情况。

结果

在刚果民主共和国(OR 2.34;95%CI 0.97-5.66)、印度(OR 2.27;95%CI 1.05-4.93)和肯尼亚(OR 1.65;95%CI 1.16-2.35),与伴侣在基线时讨论计划生育的女性更有可能采用避孕措施。在尼日利亚,与任何卫生机构工作人员讨论计划生育的女性成为使用者的可能性增加 1.72 倍(95%CI 1.13-2.67)。在尼日利亚,在基线时库存不足的设施中,采用避孕措施的可能性较低(OR 0.66;95%CI 0.44-1.00)。在其他环境中,与避孕措施采用相关的特征还有教育程度、年龄、财富、胎次和婚姻状况。

结论

女性和医疗机构的特征都与未来采用现代避孕方法有关。一些特征,如与配偶讨论计划生育、教育程度和胎次,在不同环境中与避孕措施的采用有关。其他预测避孕措施使用的特征,如卫生机构措施,在不同国家有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc1a/8370635/e12eb2b0fa53/pone.0254775.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc1a/8370635/e12eb2b0fa53/pone.0254775.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc1a/8370635/e12eb2b0fa53/pone.0254775.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Service delivery point and individual characteristics associated with the adoption of modern contraceptive: A multi-country longitudinal analysis.服务提供点和个体特征与现代避孕方法的采用相关:一项多国家纵向分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 17;16(8):e0254775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254775. eCollection 2021.
2
Trends in and Correlates of Short-Acting Contraceptive Stock-Outs: Multicountry Analysis of Performance Monitoring for Action Agile Platform Data.短效避孕措施缺货趋势及相关因素:行动敏捷平台数据绩效监测多国分析。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Jun 27;12(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00411.
3
Modern contraceptive availability and stockouts: a multi-country analysis of trends in supply and consumption.现代避孕用品的可及性与缺货情况:供应与消费趋势的多国分析
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Apr 21;36(3):273-287. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa197.
4
Do users of long-acting reversible contraceptives receive the same counseling content as other modern method users? A cross-sectional, multi-country analysis of women's experiences with the Method Information Index in six sub-Saharan African countries.长效可逆避孕法的使用者所获得的咨询内容与其他现代避孕方法的使用者相同吗?一项对撒哈拉以南非洲六个国家妇女使用方法信息指数情况的横断面多国分析。
Contracept X. 2022 Nov 11;4:100088. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100088. eCollection 2022.
5
The relationship between client dissatisfaction and contraceptive discontinuation among urban family planning clients in three sub-Saharan African countries.撒哈拉以南非洲三个国家城市计划生育服务对象中客户不满意与避孕方法中断的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 22;17(8):e0271911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271911. eCollection 2022.
6
Mapping heterogeneity in family planning indicators in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Nigeria, 2000-2020.绘制 2000-2020 年布基纳法索、肯尼亚和尼日利亚计划生育指标的异质性。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 1;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03214-w.
7
Trends in contraceptive prevalence rates in sub-Saharan Africa since the 2012 London Summit on Family Planning: results from repeated cross-sectional surveys.撒哈拉以南非洲地区自 2012 年计划生育问题伦敦峰会以来的避孕普及率趋势:来自重复横断面调查的结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e904-e911. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30200-1. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Is Client Reporting on Contraceptive Use Always Accurate? Measuring Consistency and Change with a Multicountry Study.客户关于避孕措施使用情况的报告总是准确的吗?通过一项多国研究来衡量一致性和变化情况。
Stud Fam Plann. 2021 Sep;52(3):361-382. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12172. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
9
Trends in fertility intentions and contraceptive practices in the context of COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from four national and regional population-based cohorts.在 COVID-19 背景下撒哈拉以南非洲地区生育意愿和避孕措施的趋势:来自四个国家和地区基于人口的队列研究的见解。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e062385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062385.
10
How migration shapes modern contraceptive use among urban young women: Evidence from six African countries.移民如何塑造了非洲六个国家城市年轻女性的现代避孕措施使用情况。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 23;19(7):e0307141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307141. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Using structural equation modeling to examine the influence of family planning social norms on modern contraceptive use in Nigeria.运用结构方程模型研究尼日利亚计划生育社会规范对现代避孕方法使用的影响。
Front Sociol. 2022 Oct 20;7:866254. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.866254. eCollection 2022.
2
The relationship between client dissatisfaction and contraceptive discontinuation among urban family planning clients in three sub-Saharan African countries.撒哈拉以南非洲三个国家城市计划生育服务对象中客户不满意与避孕方法中断的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 22;17(8):e0271911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271911. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance monitoring and accountability: The Agile Project's protocol, record and experience.绩效监测与问责制:敏捷项目的方案、记录与经验
Gates Open Res. 2020 Aug 20;4:30. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13119.2. eCollection 2020.
2
The predictive utility of unmet need on time to contraceptive adoption: a panel study of non-contracepting Ugandan women.未满足需求对采用避孕措施时间的预测效用:乌干达未采取避孕措施女性的一项面板研究。
Contracept X. 2020 Mar 18;2:100022. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100022. eCollection 2020.
3
Individual, community and service environment factors associated with modern contraceptive use in five Sub-Saharan African countries: A multilevel, multinomial analysis using geographically linked data from PMA2020.
个体、社区和服务环境因素与撒哈拉以南非洲五个国家现代避孕方法使用的关联:使用 PMA2020 的地理关联数据进行的多层次多项分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218157. eCollection 2019.
4
Validation of Two Quality of Care Measures: Results from a Longitudinal Study of Reversible Contraceptive Users in India.两种质量关怀措施的验证:来自印度可逆避孕使用者纵向研究的结果。
Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Jun;50(2):179-193. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12093. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Modern contraceptive use, unmet need, and demand satisfied among women of reproductive age who are married or in a union in the focus countries of the Family Planning 2020 initiative: a systematic analysis using the Family Planning Estimation Tool.计划生育 2020 倡议重点国家中已婚或处于伴侣关系的育龄妇女的现代避孕措施使用、未满足的避孕需求和需求得到满足情况:利用计划生育估计工具进行的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):870-882. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33104-5. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
The Experience and Impact of Contraceptive Stockouts Among Women, Providers and Policymakers in Two Districts of Uganda.乌干达两个地区女性、医疗服务提供者和政策制定者面临避孕药具缺货的经历与影响
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Sep 1;42(3):141-150. doi: 10.1363/42e2016.
7
Determinants of contraceptive use and future contraceptive intentions of women attending child welfare clinics in urban Ghana.加纳城市地区儿童福利诊所女性的避孕措施使用情况及未来避孕意愿的影响因素
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4641-9.
8
The fertility of internal migrants to Kinshasa.前往金沙萨的国内移民的生育情况。
Genus. 2017;73(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41118-017-0020-8. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
The effect of internal migration, individual and contextual characteristics on contraceptive use among Nigerian women.内部迁移、个人及环境特征对尼日利亚女性避孕措施使用情况的影响。
Health Care Women Int. 2017 Oct;38(10):1075-1094. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1345908. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
"New Users" Are Confusing Our Counting: Reaching Consensus on How to Measure "Additional Users" of Family Planning.“新用户”让我们的计数变得混乱:如何衡量计划生育“新增用户”达成共识。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Mar 28;5(1):6-14. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00328. Print 2017 Mar 24.