• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者导航员和社区卫生工作者对临终关怀的态度。

Patient Navigator and Community Health Worker Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care.

机构信息

Moffitt Cancer Center, Departments of Breast Oncology and Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;24(11):1714-1720. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0115. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2021.0115
PMID:34403597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8823672/
Abstract

There are racial/ethnic disparities in hospice use and end-of-life (EOL) care outcomes in the United States. Although the use of community health workers (CHWs) and patient navigators (PNs) has been suggested as a means of reducing them, CHW/PNs' attitudes toward a palliative care philosophy remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine how personal attributes affect a CHW/PN's attitude toward EOL care. CHWs/PNs were recruited from two state-wide organizations and invited to complete an online survey. We collected information on demographics, attitudes toward the palliative care philosophy, and comfort with caring for patients at the EOL. Of the 70 CHWs/PNs who responded to the survey, 82.5% identified as female, 56.4% identified as black, and 56.2% had a four-year college degree or higher. The mean score on a validated scale to assess attitudes toward EOL care was 33.5 (SD = 4.9; possible range, 8-40). Eighty percent strongly agreed or agreed with being open to discussing death with a dying patient. Higher self-efficacy scores were associated with more favorable attitudes toward hospice ( = 0.306,  = 0.016). CHWs/PNs have an overall favorable attitude toward the palliative care philosophy and may be inclined to providing EOL care.

摘要

在美国,临终关怀的使用和临终护理结局存在种族/民族差异。尽管有人建议使用社区卫生工作者(CHWs)和患者导航员(PNs)来减少这些差异,但 CHW/PN 对姑息治疗理念的态度尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨个人属性如何影响 CHW/PN 对临终关怀的态度。CHWs/PN 从两个全州性组织招募,并邀请他们完成在线调查。我们收集了有关人口统计学、对姑息治疗理念的态度以及在临终关怀中照顾患者的舒适度的信息。在回应调查的 70 名 CHWs/PN 中,82.5%为女性,56.4%为黑人,56.2%拥有四年制大学学位或更高学历。评估临终关怀态度的有效量表的平均得分为 33.5(SD=4.9;可能范围为 8-40)。80%的人强烈同意或同意与临终患者讨论死亡。自我效能得分越高,对临终关怀的态度越有利( = 0.306,  = 0.016)。CHWs/PN 对姑息治疗理念总体持积极态度,可能倾向于提供临终关怀。

相似文献

1
Patient Navigator and Community Health Worker Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care.患者导航员和社区卫生工作者对临终关怀的态度。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;24(11):1714-1720. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0115. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Impact of Oncologists' Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care on Patients' Access to Palliative Care.肿瘤学家对临终关怀的态度对患者获得姑息治疗的影响。
Oncologist. 2016 Sep;21(9):1149-55. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0090. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Dissemination and Implementation of a Community Health Worker Intervention for Disparities in Palliative Care (DeCIDE PC): a study protocol for a hybrid type 1 randomized controlled trial.社区卫生工作者干预措施在姑息治疗差异中的传播和实施(DeCIDE PC):一项混合 1 型随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Sep 18;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01250-0.
4
Are Health-Care Providers Well Prepared in Providing Optimal End-of-Life Care to Critically Ill Patients? A Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in the United States.医疗保健提供者是否为危重症患者提供最佳临终关怀做好了充分准备?美国一家三级保健医院的横断面研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):1080-1094. doi: 10.1177/0885066618811794. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
African American patient and caregiver attitudes and perceptions of community health workers as lay patient navigators in palliative care.非裔美国患者及其护理人员对社区卫生工作者作为姑息治疗中初级患者导航员的态度和看法。
Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Sep;13(5):1189-1201. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-602. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
6
Knowledge and attitudes toward end-of-life care among community health care providers and its influencing factors in China: A cross-sectional study.中国社区卫生保健提供者对临终关怀的认知与态度及其影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(45):e17683. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017683.
7
Perspectives on death and dying: a study of resident comfort with End-of-life care.关于死亡与临终的观点:一项关于住院医师对临终关怀舒适度的研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 21;16(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0819-6.
8
Establishing a health profession: What oncology patient navigators can learn from the National Association of Community Health Workers.建立一个健康的职业:肿瘤患者导航员可以从全国社区卫生工作者协会中学到什么。
Cancer. 2022 Jul 1;128 Suppl 13:2659-2663. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33770.
9
Factors associated with favorable attitudes toward end-of-life planning.与对临终规划持积极态度相关的因素。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 May;28(3):176-82. doi: 10.1177/1049909110382770. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
10
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review.养老院临终关怀中的种族/民族差异:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):279-290.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextualizing attitudes toward medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: hospice philosophy of care, patient-centered care, and professional exposure.在美国跨学科临终关怀临床医生全国样本中,对临终医疗救助态度的背景分析:临终关怀护理理念、以患者为中心的护理以及专业接触经历
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Dec 8;18:26323524241302097. doi: 10.1177/26323524241302097. eCollection 2024.
2
Further Psychometric Evaluation of the Eight-Item Hospice Philosophy Scale: Results From a National Sample of Interdisciplinary Hospice Clinicians.八项临终关怀理念量表的进一步心理测量评估:来自全国跨学科临终关怀临床医生样本的结果
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan;44(1):70-82. doi: 10.1177/07334648241265183. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Impact of training on knowledge, confidence and attitude amongst community health volunteers in the provision of community-based palliative care in rural Kenya.培训对肯尼亚农村社区中基于社区的姑息治疗服务中社区卫生志愿者的知识、信心和态度的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 11;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01415-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Can Community Health Workers Increase Palliative Care Use for African American Patients? A Pilot Study.社区卫生工作者能否增加非裔美国患者的姑息治疗使用率?一项试点研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Feb;17(2):e158-e167. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00574. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Association of a Lay Health Worker Intervention With Symptom Burden, Survival, Health Care Use, and Total Costs Among Medicare Enrollees With Cancer.一项由非专业健康工作者干预措施对医疗保险参保癌症患者的症状负担、生存、医疗保健使用和总费用的影响的研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201023. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1023.
3
Theory-Based Development of an Implementation Intervention Using Community Health Workers to Increase Palliative Care Use.基于理论开发利用社区卫生工作者增加姑息治疗使用的实施干预措施。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
4
Community-Based Conversations about Advance Care Planning for Underserved Populations Using Lay Patient Navigators.利用非专业的患者导航员开展针对服务欠缺人群的预先医疗照护计划的社区对话。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;23(7):907-914. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0470. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
5
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Use of Community Health Workers To Improve Palliative Care Use by African Americans with Cancer.利益相关者对利用社区卫生工作者改善非裔美国人癌症患者姑息治疗使用的看法。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):302-306. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0366. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
6
Self-efficacy and Stress Among Informal Caregivers of Individuals at End of Life.临终患者非正式照料者的自我效能感与压力
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018 Oct;20(5):471-477. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000464.
7
Use of Inpatient Palliative Care by Type of Malignancy.按恶性肿瘤类型使用住院姑息治疗。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;21(9):1300-1307. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0003. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
Measuring Attitudes About End-of-Life Care: Evaluation of a Modified Version of the Hospice Philosophy Scale.测量临终关怀态度:修订版临终关怀理念量表的评估。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Aug;39(8):828-833. doi: 10.1177/0733464818774640. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Roles and Functions of Community Health Workers in Primary Care.社区卫生工作者在初级保健中的角色和功能。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 May;16(3):240-245. doi: 10.1370/afm.2208.
10
Self-competence in death work among health and social care workers: a region-wide survey in Hong Kong.死亡相关工作自我胜任力:香港全港范围的卫生和社会保健工作者调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Apr 20;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0317-1.