Suppr超能文献

口服 Pentasa(美沙拉嗪控释片)治疗轻中度溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of oral Pentasa (prolonged-release mesalazine) in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Ferring International Center, St-Prex, Switzerland.

Violicom Medical Limited, Aldermaston, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Nov;37(11):1891-1900. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1968813. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pentasa (prolonged-release mesalazine [5-ASA]) has been available for >30 years as an effective treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken to provide an up-to-date evaluation of oral Pentasa efficacy and safety for induction and maintenance of remission.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, from inception to 02 December 2020. Unpublished studies were also sourced. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model and Bayesian inference compared Pentasa (tablets, granules, capsules) against placebo and other 5-ASAs.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 3674 patients treated with Pentasa were identified. Pentasa 2-4 g/day was superior to placebo at inducing (absolute risk difference [ARD] at 8 weeks 0.14, 95% CI 0.07‒0.21;  < .001) and maintaining (ARD 6-12 months 0.18, 95% CI 0.04‒0.33;  < .05) remission (clinical/endoscopic). Against other 5-ASAs, Pentasa had similar efficacy for induction (ARD <0.001, 95% CI -0.05‒0.05) and maintenance (ARD 0.01, 95% CI -0.07‒0.08) treatment using randomized controlled trial data. Upon inclusion of real-world study data, Pentasa was significantly better at maintaining remission compared both to Eudragit-S mesalazine and sulfasalazine (ARD 0.04, 95% CI 0.02‒0.06;  < .001). Pentasa (1-4 g/day) had similar treatment-related adverse event rates to placebo (ARD 0.02, 95% CI -0.03‒0.06) and Eudragit-L/S mesalazines (2.25-3 vs 2.4-3 g/day, respectively; ARD -0.03, 95% CI -0.12‒0.05), but was better tolerated than sulfasalazine (3 g/day) (ARD 0.07, 95% CI 0.003‒0.14;  < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms oral Pentasa is efficacious and well-tolerated in treating active UC and maintaining remission. The availability of multiple forms of Pentasa supports physicians' ability to individualize treatment and optimize dosing to improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

Pentasa(美沙拉嗪缓释剂[5-ASA])作为一种有效的轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)治疗药物已经上市超过 30 年。本系统文献回顾和荟萃分析旨在提供 Pentasa 口服疗效和安全性的最新评估,用于诱导和维持缓解。

方法

从建库至 2020 年 12 月 2 日,在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行文献检索,同时也检索了未发表的研究。使用随机效应模型和贝叶斯推断的荟萃分析比较了 Pentasa(片剂、颗粒剂、胶囊)与安慰剂和其他 5-ASA 药物的疗效。

结果

共确定了 12 项涉及 3674 例接受 Pentasa 治疗的患者的研究。与安慰剂相比,Pentasa 2-4 g/天在诱导(8 周时绝对风险差异[ARD]为 0.14,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.07-0.21; < .001)和维持(6-12 个月时 ARD 为 0.18,95% CI 为 0.04-0.33; < .05)缓解(临床/内镜)方面更优。与其他 5-ASA 药物相比,基于随机对照试验数据,Pentasa 在诱导缓解(ARD <0.001,95% CI -0.05-0.05)和维持缓解(ARD 0.01,95% CI -0.07-0.08)方面疗效相似。纳入真实世界研究数据后,与 Eudragit-S 美沙拉嗪和柳氮磺胺吡啶相比,Pentasa 在维持缓解方面显著更优(ARD 0.04,95% CI 0.02-0.06; < .001)。Pentasa(1-4 g/天)与安慰剂(ARD 0.02,95% CI -0.03-0.06)和 Eudragit-L/S 美沙拉嗪(分别为 2.25-3 和 3 g/天)的治疗相关不良事件发生率相似(ARD -0.03,95% CI -0.12-0.05),但耐受性优于柳氮磺胺吡啶(3 g/天)(ARD 0.07,95% CI 0.003-0.14; < .05)。

结论

本研究证实,口服 Pentasa 治疗活动期 UC 和维持缓解有效且耐受性良好。Pentasa 有多种剂型,这支持医生根据患者情况进行个体化治疗和优化剂量,以改善治疗结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验