• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证一种工具,以评估针对医护人员 SARS-CoV-2 感染控制策略的指南。

Development and validation of a tool to appraise guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 infection control strategies in healthcare workers.

机构信息

Frankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC Australia; The Bays Hospital, Mornington, VIC Australia; Monash University, Frankston, VIC Australia.

Frankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC Australia; The Bays Hospital, Mornington, VIC Australia; Calvary Public Hospital, ACT, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Crit Care. 2022 Jul;35(4):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.015
PMID:34404579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8266544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines on infection control strategies in healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in protecting them during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Poorly constructed guidelines that are incomprehensive and/or ambiguous may compromise HCWs' safety.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a tool to appraise guidelines on infection control strategies in HCWs based on the guidelines published early in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND OUTCOMES: A three-stage, web-based, Delphi consensus-building process among a panel of diverse HCWs and healthcare managers was performed. The tool was validated by appraising 40 international, specialty-specific, and procedure-specific guidelines along with national guidelines from countries with a wide range of gross national income.

RESULTS

Overall consensus (≥75%) was reached at the end of three rounds for all six domains included in the tool. The Delphi panel recommended an ideal infection control guideline should encompass six domains: general characteristics (domain 1), engineering recommendations (domain 2), personal protective equipment (PPE) use (domain 3), and administrative aspects (domain 4-6) of infection control. The appraisal tool performed well across the six domains, and the inter-rater agreement was excellent for the 40 guidelines. All included guidelines performed relatively better in domains 1-3 than in domains 4-6, and this was more evident in guidelines originating from lower income countries.

CONCLUSION

The guideline appraisal tool was robust and easy to use. Engineering recommendations aspects of infection control, administrative measures that promote optimal PPE use, and HCW wellbeing were generally lacking in assessed guidelines. This tool may enable health systems to adopt high-quality HCW infection control guidelines during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and may also provide a framework for future guideline development.

摘要

背景

临床医护人员感染控制策略指南在保护医护人员免受严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型大流行的影响方面发挥着重要作用。构建不当、不全面且/或不明确的指南可能会危及医护人员的安全。

目的

本研究旨在开发和验证一种工具,以根据在 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行早期发布的指南,评估医护人员感染控制策略指南。

设计、地点和结果:通过对一组不同的医护人员和医疗保健管理人员进行三轮在线德尔菲共识建立过程,进行了三个阶段的研究。该工具通过评估 40 项国际、专业特定和程序特定指南以及来自国民收入差异较大的国家的国家指南进行了验证。

结论

该指南评估工具稳健且易于使用。感染控制的工程建议、促进最佳个人防护装备使用的行政措施以及医护人员的健康福利在评估的指南中普遍缺失。该工具可使卫生系统在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型大流行期间采用高质量的医护人员感染控制指南,也可为未来的指南制定提供框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6045/8266544/f3f9f062eaa7/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6045/8266544/d5c6bc708cdb/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6045/8266544/450b7bb99f11/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6045/8266544/f3f9f062eaa7/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6045/8266544/d5c6bc708cdb/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6045/8266544/450b7bb99f11/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6045/8266544/f3f9f062eaa7/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a tool to appraise guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 infection control strategies in healthcare workers.开发并验证一种工具,以评估针对医护人员 SARS-CoV-2 感染控制策略的指南。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Jul;35(4):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
2
An Integrated Strategy for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers: A Prospective Observational Study.一种预防医疗机构工作人员感染 SARS-CoV-2 的综合策略:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;17(16):5785. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165785.
3
Examining the discourse regarding the delivery of occupational infection prevention and control training to healthcare workers: a scoping review of pandemic plans of 23 countries.审视关于向医护人员提供职业感染预防和控制培训的论述:对 23 个国家大流行计划的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 24;12(8):e061850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061850.
4
A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design comparison between COVID-19 infection control guidelines' applicability and their protective value as perceived by Israeli healthcare workers, and healthcare executives' response.一种混合方法序贯解释设计,比较了以色列医护人员对 COVID-19 感染控制指南的适用性及其防护价值的看法,以及医疗保健高管的反应。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Sep 4;9(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00812-8.
5
A qualitative study on safety perception among healthcare workers of a tertiary academic care center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,一家三级学术护理中心医护人员的安全感知定性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Feb 8;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01068-0.
6
Guidance for otolaryngology health care workers performing aerosol generating medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间耳鼻喉科医护人员进行气溶胶产生医疗操作的指南。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun 3;49(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00429-2.
7
Risk factors and frequency of COVID-19 among healthcare workers at a tertiary care centre in India: a case-control study.印度一家三级保健中心医护人员中 COVID-19 的危险因素和频率:病例对照研究。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021 May 8;115(5):551-556. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab047.
8
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection among healthcare workers - What is the evidence?个人防护设备(PPE)和医护人员中的感染——有什么证据?
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;74(11):e13617. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13617. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Frontline healthcare workers' experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal.英国 COVID-19 大流行期间一线医护人员个人防护设备使用体验的快速定性评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e046199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046199.
10
Characteristics and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in healthcare workers at a London teaching hospital.伦敦教学医院医护人员中 COVID-19 的特征和传播动力学。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Oct;106(2):325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Personal protective equipment preparedness in Asia-Pacific intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A multinational survey.《2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间亚太地区重症监护病房个人防护设备准备情况:一项多国调查》。
Aust Crit Care. 2021 Mar;34(2):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
State of Personal Protective Equipment Practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.新冠疫情期间印度重症监护病房个人防护装备的使用状况:一项全国性调查
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;24(9):809-816. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23550.