Suppr超能文献

审视关于向医护人员提供职业感染预防和控制培训的论述:对 23 个国家大流行计划的范围综述。

Examining the discourse regarding the delivery of occupational infection prevention and control training to healthcare workers: a scoping review of pandemic plans of 23 countries.

机构信息

School of Population Health, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

School of Population Health, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 24;12(8):e061850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061850.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the years, countries reformed their pandemic plans but still healthcare systems were unprepared to handle the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) raised issues around shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE), inadequate occupational infection prevention and control (IPC) training, lack of guidance regarding reuse/extended use of PPE and absence of HCWs.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review was to compare national and transnational pandemic plans and COVID-19 guidelines for the inclusion of recommendations regarding pandemic-specific occupational IPC training for HCWs, as well as strategies for managing the surge in PPE needs and staffing.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

From each of the six WHO defined world regions, four countries with the highest burden of COVID-19 cases (as of mid-2020) were selected and attempted to locate the relevant pandemic plans and COVID-19 guidelines.

METHODS

Searches were undertaken of 1: National Guidelines Clearinghouse, 2: websites of international public healthcare agencies such as WHO, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and, 3: in-country health departments/Ministry of Health/Department of Public Health, between June 2020 and July 2021. The data were summarised under six themes drawn from publicly available pandemic plans and COVID-19 (IPC) guidelines of WHO, ECDC and 23 countries.

RESULTS

The WHO, ECDC and 14 countries reported pandemic-specific IPC training; however, only four discussed training HCWs on correct PPE use; six countries listed strategies to manage the surge in demand of HCWs, while only five discussed managing the shortage of PPE. None of the COVID-19 guidelines recommended training HCWs for correct reuse or extended use of PPE and only one country's guideline outlined mandatory HCWs attendance and delivery of training in a regional language.

CONCLUSION

Pandemic plans should be revised to include guiding principles regarding the delivery of pandemic specific IPC training. There is also a need to provide guidance on when countries should consider reuse and extended use of PPE. This discourse should also be reflected in disease-specific pandemic guidelines, like COVID-19 (IPC) guidelines. The aim of this review is to assist international health agencies in generating evidence-based guideline updates.

摘要

背景

多年来,各国对其大流行计划进行了改革,但医疗保健系统仍未做好应对 COVID-19 大流行的准备。在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间,医护人员(HCWs)提出了个人防护设备(PPE)短缺、职业感染预防和控制(IPC)培训不足、PPE 再利用/延长使用方面缺乏指导以及 HCWs 缺失等问题。

目的

本范围综述的目的是比较国家和跨国大流行计划和 COVID-19 指南,以纳入有关针对 HCWs 的大流行特定职业 IPC 培训的建议,以及管理 PPE 需求和人员配备激增的策略。

纳入标准

从世卫组织定义的六个世界区域中,选择了 COVID-19 病例负担最高的四个国家(截至 2020 年年中),并试图查找相关的大流行计划和 COVID-19 指南。

方法

于 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 7 月期间,在以下 1:国家指南清理中心、2:世卫组织、欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)等国际公共卫生机构的网站、3:国内卫生部门/卫生部/公共卫生部进行了搜索。数据根据来自世卫组织、ECDC 和 23 个国家的公开大流行计划和 COVID-19(IPC)指南中的六个主题进行了总结。

结果

世卫组织、ECDC 和 14 个国家报告了大流行特定的 IPC 培训;然而,只有四个国家讨论了培训 HCWs 正确使用 PPE;六个国家列出了管理 HCWs 需求激增的策略,而只有五个国家讨论了管理 PPE 短缺的问题。没有 COVID-19 指南建议培训 HCWs 正确再利用或延长使用 PPE,只有一个国家的指南概述了在区域语言中强制 HCWs 参加和提供培训。

结论

大流行计划应进行修订,纳入有关提供大流行特定 IPC 培训的指导原则。还需要就何时应考虑 PPE 的再利用和延长使用提供指导。这一讨论也应反映在特定疾病的大流行指南中,如 COVID-19(IPC)指南。本综述的目的是协助国际卫生机构生成基于证据的指南更新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec5/9413176/a7f1c7bc0312/bmjopen-2022-061850f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验