Suppr超能文献

原发性、早期和晚期针刀瘘道切开术在胆道入路中的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of primary, early and late needle-knife fistulotomy for biliary access.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19 PT-2720-276, Amadora, Portugal.

Department of Gastroenterology - Nova Medical School/Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 17;11(1):16658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96142-9.

Abstract

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) as the preferred precut technique. However, there is little information on whether NKF performed at different times is associated with different success and adverse event rates. We compared the outcomes of 3 different timings of NKF. This was an observational study conducted at 4 institutions and this was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included 330 consecutive patients submitted to NKF attempt for biliary access. Patients were divided into three groups: NKF as an initial procedure for biliary access (group A, n = 121); early NKF defined as after 5 min, 5 attempts, or 2 pancreatic passages (group B, n = 99); and late NKF: after at least 10 min of unsuccessful standard biliary cannulation (group C, n = 110). We assessed the success rate of biliary cannulation at initial ERCP, time to perform NKF until biliary cannulation, overall biliary cannulation rate (second ERCP when initial failure), adverse event rate, and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). The initial cannulation rate was 98%, 91% and 94% for groups A, B and C respectively, p = 0.08, whereas overall biliary cannulation rate was 100%, 95% and 98%, p = 0.115. The adverse event rate/PEP was 4.1%/2.5%, 7.1%/4% and 10.9%/8.2%, for groups A, B and C respectively, (p = 0.197 and p = 0.190). Median time for creating the fistula was A = 4.0 min, B = 3.2 min, and C = 5.6 min, p < 000.1. Each additional minute spent attempting cannulation increased the odds ratio (OR) for PEP by 1.072, and patients with 3 or more risk factors for pancreatitis had a higher chance of PEP. In conclusion, the timing of NFK does not appear to influence success rates but late NFK is associated with a higher time to create a fistula and an increased risk of pancreatitis. Primary NFK is associated with a high rate of success and a low rate of PEP and deserves additional investigation.

摘要

欧洲胃肠道内镜学会建议使用针刀切开术(NKF)作为首选的预切开技术。然而,关于在不同时间进行 NKF 是否与不同的成功率和不良事件发生率相关的信息较少。我们比较了 NKF 的 3 种不同时机的结果。这是在 4 个机构进行的观察性研究,也是对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。我们纳入了 330 例连续接受 NKF 尝试胆道入路的患者。患者分为 3 组:NKF 作为胆道入路的初始程序(A 组,n=121);早期 NKF 定义为 5 分钟后、5 次尝试或 2 次胰管通过(B 组,n=99);晚期 NKF:在至少 10 分钟不成功的标准胆道插管后(C 组,n=110)。我们评估了初始 ERCP 时胆道插管的成功率、进行 NKF 至胆道插管的时间、整体胆道插管率(初次失败时进行第二次 ERCP)、不良事件发生率以及预测 ERCP 后胰腺炎(PEP)的因素。A、B 和 C 组的初始插管率分别为 98%、91%和 94%,p=0.08,而整体胆道插管率分别为 100%、95%和 98%,p=0.115。A、B 和 C 组的不良事件发生率/PEP 分别为 4.1%/2.5%、7.1%/4%和 10.9%/8.2%,(p=0.197 和 p=0.190)。创建瘘管的中位时间为 A=4.0 分钟,B=3.2 分钟,C=5.6 分钟,p<0.0001。每增加 1 分钟尝试插管,PEP 的优势比(OR)增加 1.072,且有 3 个或更多胰腺炎危险因素的患者发生 PEP 的几率更高。总之,NKF 的时机似乎不会影响成功率,但晚期 NKF 与创建瘘管的时间更长和胰腺炎风险增加相关。原发性 NKF 与高成功率和低 PEP 发生率相关,值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9206/8371017/f5900df3b2df/41598_2021_96142_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验