Suppr超能文献

尿药物检测能否发现因慢性疼痛而开具阿片类药物的患者药物滥用?

Do Urine Drug Tests Reveal Substance Misuse Among Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain?

机构信息

Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Private Practice, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2365-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07095-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urine drug testing (UDT) is a recommended risk mitigation strategy for patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain, but evidence that UDT supports identification of substance misuse is limited.

OBJECTIVE

Identify the prevalence of UDT results that may identify substance misuse, including diversion, among patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Patients (n=638) receiving opioids for chronic pain who had one or more UDTs, examining up to eight substances per sample, during a one 1-year period.

MAIN MEASURES

Experts adjudicated the clinical concern that UDT results suggest substance misuse or diversion as not concerning, uncertain, or concerning.

KEY RESULTS

Of 638 patients, 48% were female and 49% were over age 55 years. Patients had a median of three UDTs during the intervention year. We identified 37% of patients (235/638) with ≥1 concerning UDT and a further 35% (222/638) having ≥1 uncertain UDT. We found concerning UDTs due to non-detection of a prescribed substance in 24% (156/638) of patients and detection of a non-prescribed substance in 23% (147/638). Compared to patients over 65 years, those aged 18-34 years were more likely to have concerning UDT results with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-12.5). Patients with mental health diagnoses (AOR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.3]) and substance use diagnoses (AOR 2.3 [95% CI 1.5-3.7]) were more likely to have a concerning UDT result.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert adjudication of UDT results identified clinical concern for substance misuse in 37% of patients receiving opioids for chronic pain. Further research is needed to determine if UDTs impact clinical practice or patient-related outcomes.

摘要

背景

尿液药物检测(UDT)是为慢性疼痛患者开处阿片类药物的推荐风险缓解策略,但支持 UDT 识别药物滥用的证据有限。

目的

确定接受慢性疼痛阿片类药物治疗的患者中,UDT 结果可能识别出药物滥用(包括药物转移)的发生率。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

受试者

在一个为期 1 年的时间内,接受阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛且接受过一次或多次 UDT 的患者(n=638),每次检测最多可检测 8 种物质。

主要措施

专家对 UDT 结果提示药物滥用或药物转移的临床关注程度进行了判断,将结果分为不关注、不确定和关注三种情况。

主要结果

638 名患者中,48%为女性,49%年龄超过 55 岁。患者在干预年内平均进行了三次 UDT。我们发现 37%(235/638)的患者至少有一次 UDT 结果为关注,另有 35%(222/638)的患者至少有一次 UDT 结果为不确定。我们发现,24%(156/638)的患者因未检测到处方药物而出现关注性 UDT,23%(147/638)的患者因检测到非处方药物而出现关注性 UDT。与 65 岁以上的患者相比,年龄在 18-34 岁之间的患者出现关注性 UDT 结果的可能性更大,调整后的优势比(AOR)为 4.8(95%置信区间 [CI] 1.9-12.5)。有精神健康诊断(AOR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.3])和物质使用诊断(AOR 2.3 [95% CI 1.5-3.7])的患者更有可能出现关注性 UDT 结果。

结论

对 UDT 结果进行专家判断,确定了接受慢性疼痛阿片类药物治疗的患者中有 37%存在药物滥用的临床关注。需要进一步研究以确定 UDT 是否会影响临床实践或患者相关结局。

相似文献

1
Do Urine Drug Tests Reveal Substance Misuse Among Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain?
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2365-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07095-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Chronic opioid therapy urine drug testing in primary care: prevalence and predictors of aberrant results.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1663-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3010-y. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
4
Chronic opioid therapy risk reduction initiative: impact on urine drug testing rates and results.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2651-6. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
9
Shorter drug testing intervals are associated with improved drug misuse rates.
J Opioid Manag. 2020;16(5):357-373. doi: 10.5055/jom.2020.0591.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in Adult Outpatient Opioid Prescription Dispensing by Age and Sex - United States, 2008-2018.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):298-302. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6911a5.
2
Trends In Opioid Prescribing And Self-Reported Pain Among US Adults.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):146-154. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00783.
3
Provider Misinterpretation, Documentation, and Follow-Up of Definitive Urine Drug Testing Results.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):283-290. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05514-5. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2285-2287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1904190. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
The triple wave epidemic: Supply and demand drivers of the US opioid overdose crisis.
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Sep;71:183-188. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
7
Potentially Inappropriate Opioid Prescribing, Overdose, and Mortality in Massachusetts, 2011-2015.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1512-1519. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4532-5. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
9
Managing Concerning Behaviors in Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain: A Delphi Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Feb;33(2):166-176. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4211-y. Epub 2017 Dec 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验