Budhwani Suman, Fujioka Jamie Keiko, Chu Cherry, Baranek Hayley, Pus Laura, Wasserman Lori, Vigod Simone, Martin Danielle, Agarwal Payal, Mukerji Geetha
Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions & Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 21;5(9):e30280. doi: 10.2196/30280.
Virtual care delivery within mental health has increased rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding facilitators and challenges to adoption and perceptions of the quality of virtual care when delivered at scale can inform service planning postpandemic.
We sought to understand consistent facilitators and persistent challenges to adoption of virtual care and perceived impact on quality of care in an initial pilot phase prior to the pandemic and then during scaled use during the pandemic in the mental health department of an ambulatory care hospital.
This study took place at Women's College Hospital, an academic ambulatory hospital located in Toronto, Canada. We utilized a multimethods approach to collect quantitative data through aggregate utilization data of phone, video, and in-person visits prior to and during COVID-19 lockdown measures and through a provider experience survey administered to mental health providers (n=30). Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions on provider experience surveys, focus groups (n=4) with mental health providers, and interviews with clinical administrative and implementation hospital staff (n=3).
Utilization data demonstrated slower uptake of video visits at launch and prior to COVID-19 lockdown measures in Ontario (pre-March 2020) and subsequent increased uptake of phone and video visits during COVID-19 lockdown measures (post-March 2020). Mental health providers and clinic staff highlighted barriers and facilitators to adoption of virtual care at the operational, behavioral, cultural, and system/policy levels such as required changes in workflows and scheduling, increased provider effort, provider and staff acceptance, and billing codes for physician providers. Much of the described provider experiences focused on perceived impact on quality of mental health care delivery, including perceptions on providing appropriate and patient-centered care, virtual care effectiveness, and equitable access to care for patients.
Continued efforts to enhance suggested facilitators, reduce persistent challenges, and address provider concerns about care quality based on these findings can enable a hybrid model of patient-centered and appropriate care to emerge in the future, with options for in-person, video, and phone visits being used to meet patient and clinical needs as required.
在新冠疫情期间,心理健康领域的虚拟护理服务迅速增加。了解大规模提供虚拟护理时采用的促进因素和挑战以及对其质量的看法,可为疫情后服务规划提供参考。
我们试图了解在一家门诊护理医院的精神健康部门,在疫情之前的初始试点阶段以及疫情期间大规模使用虚拟护理时,采用虚拟护理的一致促进因素和持续挑战,以及对护理质量的感知影响。
本研究在位于加拿大多伦多的一所学术性门诊医院女子学院医院进行。我们采用多方法收集定量数据,通过新冠疫情封锁措施实施之前和期间电话、视频及面对面就诊的汇总利用数据,以及对精神健康服务提供者(n = 30)进行的提供者体验调查。定性数据通过提供者体验调查中的开放式问题、与精神健康服务提供者进行的焦点小组访谈(n = 4)以及对临床行政和实施医院工作人员的访谈(n = 3)收集。
利用数据显示,在安大略省启动视频就诊服务时以及新冠疫情封锁措施实施之前(2020年3月之前),视频就诊的采用速度较慢,而在新冠疫情封锁措施实施期间(2020年3月之后),电话和视频就诊的采用率随后有所增加。精神健康服务提供者和诊所工作人员强调了在运营、行为、文化以及系统/政策层面采用虚拟护理的障碍和促进因素,例如工作流程和排班所需的改变、提供者工作量增加、提供者和工作人员的接受度,以及医生提供者的计费代码。所描述的提供者体验大多集中在对精神健康护理质量的感知影响上,包括对提供适当且以患者为中心的护理、虚拟护理效果以及患者公平获得护理的看法。
基于这些发现,持续努力增强建议的促进因素、减少持续存在的挑战并解决提供者对护理质量的担忧,未来可能会出现一种以患者为中心且适当护理的混合模式,根据需要提供面对面、视频和电话就诊选项,以满足患者和临床需求。