Andleeb Roshan, Agrawal Sanjay, Gupta Priyanka
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Asian Spine J. 2022 Apr;16(2):221-230. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0015. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind exploratory study.
To compare effects of dexmedetomidine or a subanesthetic dose of ketamine on the amplitude and latency of transcranial electrically generated motor evoked potentials.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is a standard anesthesia technique for transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring in spine surgery. We aimed to determine whether the use of dexmedetomidine and ketamine as a component of TIVA exerted any beneficial effect on the quality of monitoring.
A total of 90 American Society of Anesthesiologist grade I-III patients, aged 18-65 years, with a motor power of ≥4/5 grade as per the Medical Research Council Scale in all four limbs who were scheduled for elective spine surgery under transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring were enrolled. The subjects were randomly allocated into the following three groups: group PD who received 0.5 μg/kg/hr dexmedetomidine infusion, group PK who received 0.5 mg/kg/hr ketamine infusion, and group PS who received normal saline infusion, along with standard propofol-fentanyl based TIVA regime. Amplitude and latency of bilateral motor evoked potentials of the tibialis anterior and abductor halluces muscle were recorded at Ti (at train-of-four ratio >90%), T30 (30 minutes post-Ti), T60 (60 minutes post-Ti), and Tf (at the end of spine manipulation).
Baseline median amplitudes were comparable among the study groups. In group PK, we noted a gradually enhanced response by 24%-100% from the baseline amplitude. The median amplitudes of all the muscles were higher in group PK than those in groups PS and PD at time points T60 and Tf (p <0.05).
The present study demonstrated that compared with dexmedetomidine and control treatment, a subanesthetic dose of ketamine caused gradual improvement in amplitudes without affecting the latency.
前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲探索性研究。
比较右美托咪定或亚麻醉剂量氯胺酮对经颅电刺激运动诱发电位的波幅和潜伏期的影响。
全静脉麻醉(TIVA)是脊柱手术中经颅电刺激运动诱发电位监测的标准麻醉技术。我们旨在确定将右美托咪定和氯胺酮作为TIVA的组成部分是否对监测质量有任何有益影响。
共纳入90例年龄在18 - 65岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I - III级、根据医学研究委员会量表四肢运动力量均≥4/5级、计划在经颅电刺激运动诱发电位监测下进行择期脊柱手术的患者。受试者被随机分为以下三组:接受0.5μg/kg/小时右美托咪定输注的PD组、接受0.5mg/kg/小时氯胺酮输注的PK组和接受生理盐水输注的PS组,同时采用基于丙泊酚 - 芬太尼的标准TIVA方案。在Ti(四个成串刺激比率>90%时)、T30(Ti后30分钟)、T60(Ti后60分钟)和Tf(脊柱操作结束时)记录双侧胫前肌和拇短展肌运动诱发电位的波幅和潜伏期。
研究组间基线中位波幅具有可比性。在PK组,我们注意到与基线波幅相比,反应逐渐增强24% - 100%。在T60和Tf时间点,PK组所有肌肉的中位波幅均高于PS组和PD组(p<0.05)。
本研究表明,与右美托咪定和对照治疗相比,亚麻醉剂量的氯胺酮可使波幅逐渐改善,且不影响潜伏期。