Li Yan, Meng Lingzhong, Peng Yuming, Qiao Hui, Guo Lanjun, Han Ruquan, Gelb Adrian W
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6 Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China, 100050.
Departments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 2;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0217-y.
We hypothesized that the addition of dexmedetomidine in a clinically relevant dose to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia regimen does not exert an adverse effect on motor-evoked potentials (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) in adult patients undergoing thoracic spinal cord tumor resection.
Seventy-one adult patients were randomized into three groups. Propofol group (n = 25): propofol-remifentanil regimenand the dosage was adjusted to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 50. DP adjusted group (n = 23): Dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg loading dose infused over 10 min followed by a constant infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h) was added to the propofol-remifentanil regimen and propofol was adjusted to maintain BIS between 40 and 50. DP unadjusted group (n = 23): Dexmedetomidine (administer as DP adjusted group) was added to the propofol-remifentanil regimen and propofol was not adjusted. All patients received MEP, SSEP and BIS monitoring.
There were no significant changes in the amplitude and latency of MEP and SSEP among different groups (P > 0.05). The estimated propofol plasma concentration in DP adjusted group (2.7 ± 0.3 μg/ml) was significantly lower than in propofol group (3.1 ± 0.2 μg/ml) and DP unadjusted group (3.1 ± 0.2 μg/ml) (P = 0.000). BIS in DP unadjusted group (35 ± 5) was significantly lower than in propofol group (44 ± 3) (P = 0.000).
The addition of dexmedetomidine to propofol-remifentanil regimen does not exert an adverse effect on MEP and SSEP monitoring in adult patients undergoing thoracic spinal cord tumor resection.
The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on January 31st, 2014. The reference number was ChiCTR-TRC-14004229.
我们假设在接受胸椎脊髓肿瘤切除术的成年患者的丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉方案中添加临床相关剂量的右美托咪定,不会对运动诱发电位(MEP)和体感诱发电位(SSEP)产生不利影响。
71例成年患者被随机分为三组。丙泊酚组(n = 25):采用丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼方案,调整剂量以维持脑电双频指数(BIS)在40至50之间。右美托咪定调整组(n = 23):在丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼方案中添加右美托咪定(0.5μg/kg负荷剂量在10分钟内输注,随后以0.5μg/kg/h持续输注),并调整丙泊酚剂量以维持BIS在40至50之间。右美托咪定未调整组(n = 23):在丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼方案中添加右美托咪定(给药方式同右美托咪定调整组),但不调整丙泊酚剂量。所有患者均接受MEP、SSEP和BIS监测。
不同组间MEP和SSEP的波幅和潜伏期无显著变化(P > 0.05)。右美托咪定调整组的丙泊酚血浆浓度估计值(2.7±0.3μg/ml)显著低于丙泊酚组(3.1±0.2μg/ml)和右美托咪定未调整组(3.1±0.2μg/ml)(P = 0.000)。右美托咪定未调整组的BIS(35±5)显著低于丙泊酚组(44±3)(P = 0.000)。
在接受胸椎脊髓肿瘤切除术的成年患者的丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼方案中添加右美托咪定,对MEP和SSEP监测无不利影响。
该研究于2014年1月31日在中国临床试验注册中心注册。注册号为ChiCTR-TRC-14004229。