• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于单臂研究的 FDA 批准癌症药物的随机对照试验的可行性。

Feasibility of Randomized Controlled Trials for Cancer Drugs Approved by the Food and Drug Administration Based on Single-Arm Studies.

机构信息

Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jun 30;5(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab061. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkab061
PMID:34409254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8364671/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) introduced an Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway to expedite patient access to new drugs. AA accepts less rigorous trial designs, including single-arm studies (SAS), owing to perceived lack of feasibility of timely randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We designed hypothetical RCTs with endpoints of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for FDA approvals based on SAS for solid tumors during 2010-2019. Existing standards of care served as controls. RCTs were designed to detect a difference with power of 0.80, α-error of 5% (2-sided), and 1:1 randomization. Accrual duration was estimated based on participation by less than 5% of eligible patients derived from cancer-specific incidence and mortality rates in the United States.

RESULTS

Of 172 (18.0%) approvals during the study period, 31 (18.0%) were based on SAS. Median sample size was 104 (range = 23-411), and 77.4% were AA. All studies reported ORR, 55% reported duration of response, 19.4% reported PFS, and 22.5% reported OS. Median sample sizes needed to conduct RCTs with endpoints of ORR, PFS, and OS were 206, 130, and 396, respectively. It would have been theoretically possible to conduct RCTs within duration comparable with that required by SAS for 84.6%, 94.1%, and 80.0% of approvals with endpoints of ORR, PFS, and OS, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An overwhelming majority of FDA approvals based on SAS should be feasible as RCTs within a reasonable time frame. Given the collateral harms to patients and to scientific rigor, drug approval based on SAS should only be permitted under exceptional circumstances.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)引入了加速批准(AA)途径,以加快新药物惠及患者。AA 接受了不太严格的试验设计,包括单臂研究(SAS),这是由于认为及时进行随机对照试验(RCT)不可行。

方法

我们设计了假设的 RCT,终点为总缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),基于 2010 年至 2019 年期间 FDA 对实体瘤的 SAS 批准。现有标准治疗作为对照。RCT 的设计目的是在双侧 5%的α错误率(2 侧)和 1:1 随机分组下,检测到 80%的效能差异。基于美国癌症特定发病率和死亡率,从合格患者中抽取不到 5%参与研究来估计入组时间。

结果

在研究期间,有 172 项(18.0%)批准中有 31 项(18.0%)基于 SAS。中位样本量为 104(范围=23-411),77.4%为 AA。所有研究均报告了 ORR,55%报告了缓解持续时间,19.4%报告了 PFS,22.5%报告了 OS。需要进行 ORR、PFS 和 OS 终点的 RCT 样本量中位数分别为 206、130 和 396。理论上,在与 SAS 要求的时间相当的时间内,对 84.6%、94.1%和 80.0%的 ORR、PFS 和 OS 终点的批准进行 RCT 是可行的。

结论

基于 SAS 的绝大多数 FDA 批准应该可以在合理的时间框架内作为 RCT 进行。鉴于对患者和科学严谨性的附带伤害,仅在特殊情况下才应允许基于 SAS 的药物批准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3274/8364671/a9a7a382529b/pkab061f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3274/8364671/a9a7a382529b/pkab061f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3274/8364671/a9a7a382529b/pkab061f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Randomized Controlled Trials for Cancer Drugs Approved by the Food and Drug Administration Based on Single-Arm Studies.基于单臂研究的 FDA 批准癌症药物的随机对照试验的可行性。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jun 30;5(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab061. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Fragility of randomized trials supporting cancer drug approvals stratified by approval pathway and review designations.支持癌症药物获批的随机试验的脆弱性,按获批途径和审评指定进行分层。
Cancer Med. 2021 Aug;10(16):5405-5414. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4029. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications.临床试验设计和治疗效果:支持 437 种 FDA 批准的癌症药物和适应证的随机对照和单臂试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Sep 20;29(5):333-341. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112544.
4
Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Novel Cancer Therapies Between 2000 and 2016.2000 年至 2016 年间支持美国食品和药物管理局批准新型癌症疗法的临床试验证据。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24406.
5
Strength of statistical evidence for the efficacy of cancer drugs: a Bayesian reanalysis of randomized trials supporting Food and Drug Administration approval.癌症药物疗效的统计证据强度:支持食品和药物管理局批准的随机试验的贝叶斯重新分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;174:111479. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111479. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Design analysis indicates Potential overestimation of treatment effects in randomized controlled trials supporting Food and Drug Administration cancer drug approvals.设计分析表明,支持美国食品和药物管理局批准癌症药物的随机对照试验中,治疗效果可能被高估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;103:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Analysis of Control Arm Quality in Randomized Clinical Trials Leading to Anticancer Drug Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.分析美国食品和药物管理局批准的抗癌药物随机临床试验中的对照臂质量。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):887-892. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0167.
8
Breast cancer drugs: FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovation, trials, endpoints, quality of life, value, and price.乳腺癌药物:FDA 批准、研发时间、疗效、临床获益、创新、临床试验、终点指标、生活质量、价值和价格。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Nov;31(6):1144-1155. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01634-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
U.S. Food and Drug Administration anticancer drug approval trends from 2016 to 2018 for lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer.2016 年至 2018 年美国食品和药物管理局批准的肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌抗癌药物趋势。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):20-28. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000813. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
10
Single pivotal trials with few corroborating characteristics were used for FDA approval of cancer therapies.单一的关键性试验,很少有特征可以相互佐证,被用于 FDA 对癌症疗法的批准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;114:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequently asked questions on surrogate endpoints in oncology-opportunities, pitfalls, and the way forward.肿瘤学中替代终点的常见问题——机遇、陷阱与未来方向
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 13;76:102824. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102824. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: A Decade of Lenvatinib Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.评估药物开发中的患者风险、获益和结局:仑伐替尼临床试验十年:系统评价。
Target Oncol. 2024 Mar;19(2):161-173. doi: 10.1007/s11523-024-01040-5. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Current drug development and trial designs in neuro-oncology: report from the first American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society for Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials Conference.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Previously Treated With Sorafenib: The CheckMate 040 Randomized Clinical Trial.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗索拉非尼治疗后晚期肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:CheckMate 040 随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Nov 1;6(11):e204564. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4564. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
Futility stopping in clinical trials, optimality and practical considerations.临床试验中的无效停止、最优性和实际考虑。
J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Nov 1;30(6):1050-1059. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1818253. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
3
Comparison of FDA accelerated vs regular pathway approvals for lung cancer treatments between 2006 and 2018.
神经肿瘤学中的当前药物研发和试验设计:来自美国临床肿瘤学会和神经肿瘤学会临床试验会议的首次报告。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Apr;24(4):e161-e171. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00005-0.
4
Basket Trials: Review of Current Practice and Innovations for Future Trials.篮子试验:当前实践的回顾与未来试验的创新。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct 20;40(30):3520-3528. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02285. Epub 2022 May 10.
比较 2006 年至 2018 年期间肺癌治疗的 FDA 加速审批与常规审批路径。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0236345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236345. eCollection 2020.
4
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Response Rates and Durations of Response for Biomarker-Based Cancer Drugs in Nonrandomized Versus Randomized Trials.基于生物标志物的癌症药物在非随机对照试验与随机对照试验中的应答率和应答持续时间。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Jan;18(1):36-43. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7345.
6
Pembrolizumab As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial.帕博利珠单抗作为 KEYNOTE-240 中晚期肝细胞癌二线治疗的疗效:一项随机、双盲、III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38(3):193-202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01307. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Unpacking Trial Offers and Low Accrual Rates: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinic Visits With Physicians and Patients Potentially Eligible for a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial.解析试验方案和低入组率:一项对潜在符合前列腺癌临床试验条件的医生和患者就诊的定性分析。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Feb;16(2):e124-e131. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00444. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.阿替利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇作为不可切除的局部晚期或转移性三阴性乳腺癌(IMpassion130)的一线治疗:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、III 期临床试验的更新疗效结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):44-59. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30689-8. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
9
U.S. Food and Drug Administration anticancer drug approval trends from 2016 to 2018 for lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer.2016 年至 2018 年美国食品和药物管理局批准的肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌抗癌药物趋势。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):20-28. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000813. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
10
US Food and Drug Administration Approvals of Drugs and Devices Based on Nonrandomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.美国食品和药物管理局基于非随机临床试验批准的药物和设备:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11111.