Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):44-59. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30689-8. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy across many different tumour types. We report the prespecified second interim overall survival analysis of the phase 3 IMpassion130 study assessing the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial, done in 246 academic centres and community oncology practices in 41 countries, patients aged 18 years or older, with previously untreated, histologically documented, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a permuted block method (block size of four) and an interactive voice-web response system. Randomisation was stratified by previous taxane use, liver metastases, and PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Patients received atezolizumab 840 mg or matching placebo intravenously on day 1 and day 15 of every 28-day cycle and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m of body surface area intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Investigators, patients, and the funder were masked to treatment assignment. Coprimary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population and in patients with PD-L1 immune cell-positive tumours (tumours with ≥1% PD-L1 expression). The final progression-free survival results were previously reported at the first interim overall survival analysis. The prespecified statistical testing hierarchy meant that overall survival in the subgroup of PD-L1 immune cell-positive patients could only be formally tested if overall survival was significantly different between the treatment groups in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02425891. FINDINGS: Between June 23, 2015, and May 24, 2017, 902 patients were enrolled, of whom 451 were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and 451 were assigned to receive placebo plus nab-paclitaxel (the intention-to-treat population). Six patients from each group did not receive treatment. At the second interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 2, 2019), median follow-up was 18·5 months (IQR 9·6-22·8) in the atezolizumab group and 17·5 months (8·4-22·4) in the placebo group. Median overall survival in the intention-to-treat patients was 21·0 months (95% CI 19·0-22·6) with atezolizumab and 18·7 months (16·9-20·3) with placebo (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·86, 95% CI 0·72-1·02, p=0·078). In the exploratory overall survival analysis in patients with PD-L1 immune cell-positive tumours, median overall survival was 25·0 months (95% CI 19·6-30·7) with atezolizumab versus 18·0 months (13·6-20·1) with placebo (stratified HR 0·71, 0·54-0·94]). As of Sept 3, 2018 (the date up to which updated safety data were available), the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (38 [8%] of 453 patients in the atezolizumab group vs 36 [8%] of 437 patients in the placebo group), peripheral neuropathy (25 [6%] vs 12 [3%]), decreased neutrophil count (22 [5%] vs 16 [4%]), and fatigue (17 [4%] vs 15 [3%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in two (<1%) patients in the atezolizumab group (autoimmune hepatitis related to atezolizumab [n=1] and septic shock related to nab-paclitaxel [n=1]) and one (<1%) patient in the placebo group (hepatic failure). No new treatment-related deaths have been reported since the primary clinical data cutoff date (April 17, 2018). INTERPRETATION: Consistent with the first interim analysis, this second interim overall survival analysis of IMpassion130 indicates no significant difference in overall survival between the treatment groups in the intention-to-treat population but suggests a clinically meaningful overall survival benefit with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1 immune cell-positive disease. However, this positive result could not be formally tested due to the prespecified statistical testing hierarchy. For patients with PD-L1 immune cell-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel is an important therapeutic option in a disease with high unmet need. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.
背景:免疫疗法联合化疗在多种不同肿瘤类型中显示出了有希望的疗效。我们报告了 III 期 IMpassion130 研究的第二次期中总生存分析结果,该研究评估了 atezolizumab 联合 nab-紫杉醇在不可切除、局部晚期或转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者中的疗效和安全性。
方法:在这项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、III 期试验中,在 41 个国家的 246 个学术中心和社区肿瘤学实践中进行,纳入年龄在 18 岁或以上、既往未接受过治疗、组织学证实的局部晚期或转移性三阴性乳腺癌、东部合作肿瘤学组体能状态为 0 或 1 的患者。患者按照 1:1 的比例使用随机区组方法(区组大小为 4)和交互式语音网络响应系统进行随机分组。随机分组按既往使用紫杉醇、肝转移和肿瘤浸润免疫细胞中 PD-L1 表达进行分层。患者接受 atezolizumab 840 mg 或匹配的安慰剂静脉输注,每 28 天周期的第 1 天和第 15 天,以及 nab-紫杉醇 100 mg/m2体表面积静脉输注,第 1、第 8 和第 15 天,直至疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。研究者、患者和资助者对治疗分配不知情。主要终点为研究者评估的根据实体瘤反应评价标准 1.1 版评估的无进展生存期和总生存期,在意向治疗人群和 PD-L1 免疫细胞阳性肿瘤患者(肿瘤 PD-L1 表达≥1%)中进行评估。无进展生存期的最终结果先前在第一次期中总生存期分析中报告过。预先指定的统计测试层次意味着,如果在意向治疗人群中治疗组之间的总生存期有显著差异,那么仅能正式测试 PD-L1 免疫细胞阳性患者亚组中的总生存期。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT02425891。
结果:2015 年 6 月 23 日至 2017 年 5 月 24 日,共纳入 902 例患者,其中 451 例随机分配接受 atezolizumab 联合 nab-紫杉醇治疗,451 例分配接受安慰剂联合 nab-紫杉醇治疗(意向治疗人群)。每组有 6 例患者未接受治疗。在第二次期中分析(数据截止日期为 2019 年 1 月 2 日)时,atezolizumab 组和安慰剂组的中位随访时间分别为 18.5 个月(95%CI9.6-22.8)和 17.5 个月(8.4-22.4)。意向治疗患者的中位总生存期为 atezolizumab 组 21.0 个月(95%CI19.0-22.6)和安慰剂组 18.7 个月(16.9-20.3)(分层风险比[HR]0.86,95%CI0.72-1.02,p=0.078)。在 PD-L1 免疫细胞阳性肿瘤患者的探索性总生存期分析中,atezolizumab 组的中位总生存期为 25.0 个月(95%CI19.6-30.7),安慰剂组为 18.0 个月(13.6-20.1)(分层 HR0.71,0.54-0.94)。截至 2018 年 9 月 3 日(更新安全性数据的截止日期),最常见的 3-4 级不良事件是中性粒细胞减少症(atezolizumab 组 453 例患者中有 38 例[8%],安慰剂组 437 例患者中有 36 例[8%])、周围神经病变(25 例[6%]vs12 例[3%])、中性粒细胞计数减少(22 例[5%]vs16 例[4%])和疲劳(17 例[4%]vs15 例[3%])。atezolizumab 组有 2 例(<1%)患者发生治疗相关死亡(1 例为与 atezolizumab 相关的自身免疫性肝炎,1 例为与 nab-紫杉醇相关的感染性休克),安慰剂组有 1 例(<1%)患者(肝衰竭)发生治疗相关死亡。自主要临床数据截止日期(2018 年 4 月 17 日)以来,没有报告新的治疗相关死亡。
解释:与第一次期中分析一致,IMpassion130 的第二次期中总生存期分析表明,在意向治疗人群中,治疗组之间的总生存期没有显著差异,但提示 atezolizumab 联合 nab-紫杉醇在 PD-L1 免疫细胞阳性疾病患者中具有临床意义的总生存期获益。然而,由于预先指定的统计测试层次,这一阳性结果无法进行正式测试。对于 PD-L1 免疫细胞阳性转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者,atezolizumab 联合 nab-紫杉醇是一种重要的治疗选择,因为该疾病存在高度未满足的需求。
资金:罗氏和基因泰克。
N Engl J Med. 2018-10-20
Sci Rep. 2025-8-25
Cancer Treat Res. 2025
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025-7-25
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025-7-24