Tessy A. Thomas is an assistant professor of pediatrics and bioethics, Geisinger Janet Weis Children's Hospital, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
F. Daniel Davis is a professor of bioethics, Geisinger Medical Center.
Am J Crit Care. 2021 Nov 1;30(6):e80-e98. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2021999.
Moral distress adversely affects the delivery of high-quality patient care and places health care professionals at risk for burnout, moral injury, and the loss of professional integrity.
To investigate whether pediatric critical care professionals are experiencing moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic and, if so, for what reasons.
An exploratory survey of pediatric critical care professionals was conducted via the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network from April to May 2020. The survey was derived from a framework integrating contemporary literature on moral distress, moral resilience, and expert consensus. Integration of descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data yielded mixed insights.
Overall, 85.8% of survey respondents reported moral distress. Nurses reported higher degrees of moral distress than other professional groups. Inducers of moral distress were related to challenges to professional integrity and lack of organizational support. Five themes were identified: (1) psychological safety, (2) expectations of leadership, (3) connectedness through a moral community, (4) professional identity challenges, and (5) professional versus social responsibility. Most respondents were confident in their ability to reason through ethical dilemmas (76.0%) and think clearly when confronting an ethical challenge even when pressured (78.9%).
During the COVID-19 pandemic, pediatric critical care professionals are experiencing moral distress due to various factors that challenge their professional integrity. Despite these challenges, they also exhibit attributes of moral resilience. Organizations have opportunities to cultivate a psychologically safe and healthy work environment to mitigate anticipatory, present, and lingering moral distress.
道德困境会对高质量的患者护理产生不利影响,并使医疗保健专业人员面临倦怠、道德伤害和职业操守丧失的风险。
调查儿科重症监护专业人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间是否经历道德困境,如果是,原因是什么。
2020 年 4 月至 5 月,通过儿科急性肺损伤和脓毒症研究人员网络对儿科重症监护专业人员进行了一项探索性调查。该调查源自一个整合了道德困境、道德韧性和专家共识的当代文献框架。对定量数据进行描述性统计和对定性数据进行主题分析,得出了混合的见解。
总体而言,85.8%的调查受访者报告了道德困境。护士比其他专业群体报告了更高程度的道德困境。道德困境的诱因与职业操守受到挑战和缺乏组织支持有关。确定了五个主题:(1)心理安全,(2)对领导力的期望,(3)通过道德共同体建立联系,(4)职业认同挑战,以及(5)职业与社会责任。大多数受访者对自己解决伦理困境的能力(76.0%)和在面临伦理挑战时保持清晰思考的能力(78.9%)有信心。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,儿科重症监护专业人员因各种因素而经历道德困境,这些因素挑战了他们的职业操守。尽管面临这些挑战,他们也表现出了道德韧性的特征。组织有机会营造一个心理安全和健康的工作环境,以减轻预期的、当前的和持久的道德困境。