Suppr超能文献

面部类型对上颔骨腭小孔的形态和位置的影响:一项 CBCT 研究。

The influence of facial types on the morphology and location of the greater palatine foramen: a CBCT study.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, State University of Paraiba, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.

Department of Dentistry, UNIFIP University Center of Patos, Patos, Paraíba, Brazil.

出版信息

Oral Radiol. 2022 Jul;38(3):337-343. doi: 10.1007/s11282-021-00563-1. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the morphology and location of the great palatine foramen (GPF) of different facial types using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

METHODS

Sixty CBCT scans were divided into: brachyfacial (n = 20), dolichofacial (n = 20) and mesofacial (n = 20) using Ricketts' VERT index for the determination of cephalometric facial type and imported into ImageJ software. GPF shape was characterized as: round, elongated in the anteroposterior direction (EAP), or elongated in the latero-medial direction (ELM). The distances between the GPF and the palatine suture (PS), the center of the GPF and the center incisive foramen (IF), the GPF and the palatine alveolar ridge (PAR), right side GPF (GPFr) and left side (GPFl) GPFs; and the angles formed from the intersection of the GPF, IF and PS were assessed. The position of the GPF was evaluated in relation to the molars.

RESULTS

GPFr and GPFl mean distances from PAR presented higher values for dolichofacial patients (p < 0.05). GPFr and GPFl location distally to the third molar (3 M) was higher for brachyfacial type, while their location distally to the second molar was higher for mesofacial and between the mesial and distal surfaces of the 3 M for dolichofacial (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The GPF was more distant from the PAR in the dolichofacial-type group. The location of the GPF in relation to the molars varied according to the facial type. However, the morphology of the GPF was similar in the three facial types, and the elongated in the anteroposterior direction morphology was more frequent.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估不同面型的腭大孔(GPF)的形态和位置。

方法

使用 Ricketts 的 VERT 指数将 60 例 CBCT 扫描分为短面型(n=20)、长面型(n=20)和中面型(n=20),用于确定头影测量面型,并将 GPF 形状特征导入 ImageJ 软件。GPF 形状分为圆形、前后向拉长(EAP)和内外向拉长(ELM)。测量 GPF 与腭缝(PS)、GPF 中心点与中切牙孔(IF)中心点、GPF 与腭牙槽嵴(PAR)之间的距离,右侧 GPF(GPFr)和左侧 GPF(GPFl)之间的距离;评估由 GPF、IF 和 PS 相交形成的角度。评估 GPF 在磨牙中的位置。

结果

GPFr 和 GPFl 距 PAR 的平均距离在长面型患者中更高(p<0.05)。短面型患者的 GPF 远中位于第三磨牙(3M),而中面型患者的 GPF 远中位于第二磨牙,长面型患者的 GPF 远中位于 3M 的近远中面之间(p<0.05)。

结论

长面型组的 GPF 距 PAR 更远。GPF 相对于磨牙的位置因面型而异。然而,三种面型的 GPF 形态相似,前后向拉长的形态更为常见。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验