Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, State University of Paraiba, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.
Department of Dentistry, UNIFIP University Center of Patos, Patos, Paraíba, Brazil.
Oral Radiol. 2022 Jul;38(3):337-343. doi: 10.1007/s11282-021-00563-1. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
This study aimed to assess the morphology and location of the great palatine foramen (GPF) of different facial types using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
Sixty CBCT scans were divided into: brachyfacial (n = 20), dolichofacial (n = 20) and mesofacial (n = 20) using Ricketts' VERT index for the determination of cephalometric facial type and imported into ImageJ software. GPF shape was characterized as: round, elongated in the anteroposterior direction (EAP), or elongated in the latero-medial direction (ELM). The distances between the GPF and the palatine suture (PS), the center of the GPF and the center incisive foramen (IF), the GPF and the palatine alveolar ridge (PAR), right side GPF (GPFr) and left side (GPFl) GPFs; and the angles formed from the intersection of the GPF, IF and PS were assessed. The position of the GPF was evaluated in relation to the molars.
GPFr and GPFl mean distances from PAR presented higher values for dolichofacial patients (p < 0.05). GPFr and GPFl location distally to the third molar (3 M) was higher for brachyfacial type, while their location distally to the second molar was higher for mesofacial and between the mesial and distal surfaces of the 3 M for dolichofacial (p < 0.05).
The GPF was more distant from the PAR in the dolichofacial-type group. The location of the GPF in relation to the molars varied according to the facial type. However, the morphology of the GPF was similar in the three facial types, and the elongated in the anteroposterior direction morphology was more frequent.
本研究旨在使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估不同面型的腭大孔(GPF)的形态和位置。
使用 Ricketts 的 VERT 指数将 60 例 CBCT 扫描分为短面型(n=20)、长面型(n=20)和中面型(n=20),用于确定头影测量面型,并将 GPF 形状特征导入 ImageJ 软件。GPF 形状分为圆形、前后向拉长(EAP)和内外向拉长(ELM)。测量 GPF 与腭缝(PS)、GPF 中心点与中切牙孔(IF)中心点、GPF 与腭牙槽嵴(PAR)之间的距离,右侧 GPF(GPFr)和左侧 GPF(GPFl)之间的距离;评估由 GPF、IF 和 PS 相交形成的角度。评估 GPF 在磨牙中的位置。
GPFr 和 GPFl 距 PAR 的平均距离在长面型患者中更高(p<0.05)。短面型患者的 GPF 远中位于第三磨牙(3M),而中面型患者的 GPF 远中位于第二磨牙,长面型患者的 GPF 远中位于 3M 的近远中面之间(p<0.05)。
长面型组的 GPF 距 PAR 更远。GPF 相对于磨牙的位置因面型而异。然而,三种面型的 GPF 形态相似,前后向拉长的形态更为常见。