Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bioethics. 2021 Oct;35(8):812-819. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12935. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
The dead donor rule (DDR) regulates current practice for vital organ donation, which means that organs may only be retrieved from people who are already dead (or brain dead). However, several authors criticize the DDR and argue that we should instead adopt a rule that allows us to retrieve vital organs before people are dead. They call this proposal organ donation euthanasia (ODE). While I am sympathetic to this proposal I do not think it goes far enough. In this paper, I show that the key reasons put forward in favor of permitting ODE actually justify a more far-reaching suggestion for regulation, permitting people to become living vital organ donors even when they are not about to die for other reasons. Further, I argue that only accepting imminently dying people as eligible donors for living vital organ donation would be objectionably paternalistic.
死体器官捐献规则(DDR)规范了当前重要器官捐献的实践,这意味着只有已经死亡(或脑死亡)的人捐献的器官才能被摘取。然而,一些作者批评 DDR,并主张我们应该转而采用一种在人死亡之前就可以摘取重要器官的规则。他们将这一建议称为“器官捐赠安乐死”(ODE)。尽管我对这一建议表示同情,但我认为它还不够充分。在本文中,我表明,支持 ODE 的主要理由实际上为更广泛的监管建议提供了依据,即允许人们在没有其他原因即将死亡的情况下成为活体重要器官捐献者。此外,我认为,仅将那些即将死亡的人视为活体重要器官捐献的合格捐赠者,将是令人反感的家长式作风。