Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2712-2717. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab221.
Conflation of the terms and concepts of "sex" and "gender" continues to perpetuate the invisibility of sex and gender minorities and obscure information about the ways in which biological sex and gender affect health. The misuse of sex and gender terms and the sex and gender binaries can yield inaccurate results but also, more importantly, contributes to the erasure of intersex, transgender, nonbinary, and agender health experiences. In this article, we discuss ways in which public health researchers can use sex and gender terms correctly and center the health experiences of intersex, transgender, nonbinary, and agender individuals. This includes promoting sensitivity in approaching sex and gender minority communities, improving survey questions, and collaborating with GSM communities to improve research quality and participant experiences. Improving our standards for the quality of sex and gender term usage and centering sex and gender minorities in public health research are imperative to addressing the health inequalities faced by sex and gender minorities.
术语和概念“性”和“性别”的混淆继续使性别少数群体和性少数群体的可见性变得不可见,并掩盖了生物性别和性别影响健康的方式的信息。性和性别术语的滥用以及性和性别二元论不仅会产生不准确的结果,而且更重要的是,会导致对双性人、跨性别者、非二元性别者和无性别人群的健康体验的抹杀。在本文中,我们讨论了公共卫生研究人员如何正确使用性和性别术语,并将双性人、跨性别者、非二元性别者和无性别人群的健康体验置于中心位置。这包括在接近性别少数群体社区时提高敏感性,改进调查问题,并与 GSM 社区合作,提高研究质量和参与者体验。提高我们对性和性别术语使用质量的标准,并将性别少数群体置于公共卫生研究的中心位置,对于解决性别少数群体面临的健康不平等问题至关重要。