Suppr超能文献

对 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的随机对照试验中出现的同意书撤回和拒绝同意情况进行文献回顾。

A literature review of consent declines and consent withdrawals in randomized controlled trials conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G. S. Medical College and K. E. M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Postgrad Med. 2021 Jul-Sep;67(3):134-138. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_77_21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the extent of consent declines and consent withdrawals during the COVID-19 pandemic as seen in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compared it with non-COVID-19 RCTs published at the same time and two historical controls.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline only was searched using key-word "COVID-19" and "RCTs" separately, and filtered for COVID-19 RCTs and non-COVID-19 RCTs respectively, published during a nine-month period (1 Feb - 1 Nov 2020). Exclusions were study protocols, observational studies, interim analysis of RCT data and RCTs with missing data. Primary outcome measures were the proportion of consent declines and consent withdrawals as percentage of total participants screened and randomized respectively in COVID-19 RCTs. We compared consent declines and consent withdrawals of COVID-19 RCTs with non-COVID-19 RCTs and two earlier studies on the same topic that served as historical controls (non-pandemic setting).

RESULTS

The search yielded a total of 111 COVID-19 RCTs and 49 non-COVID-19 RCTs. Of these, 39 (35.13%) COVID-19 RCTs and 11 (22.45%) non-COVID-19 RCTs were finally analysed. A total of 770/17759 (4.3%) consent declines and 100/7607 (1.31%) consent withdrawals were seen in 39 COVID-19 RCTs. A significant difference was observed in consent declines between COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 RCTs [4.3% vs 11.9%, p < 0.0001] and between COVID-19 RCTs vs two historical controls [(4.3% vs 8.6%, p < 0.0001) and (4.3% vs 21.1%, p < 0.0001), respectively].

CONCLUSION

RCTs conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic appear to have significantly lower consent declines relative to non-COVID-19 RCTs during pandemic and RCTs conducted in non-pandemic settings.

摘要

目的

评估 COVID-19 大流行期间已发表的随机对照试验(RCT)中同意书撤回和拒绝签署的比例,并与同期发表的非 COVID-19 RCT 以及两个历史对照进行比较。

方法

仅在 PubMed/Medline 上使用关键字“COVID-19”和“RCTs”分别进行搜索,并分别过滤出 COVID-19 RCT 和非 COVID-19 RCT,发表时间为 9 个月(2020 年 2 月 1 日至 11 月 1 日)。排除研究方案、观察性研究、RCT 数据的中期分析以及数据缺失的 RCT。主要观察指标是 COVID-19 RCT 中同意书撤回和拒绝签署的比例,分别为筛选和随机分组的总人数的百分比。我们比较了 COVID-19 RCT 与非 COVID-19 RCT 以及两个关于同一主题的更早的历史对照(非大流行时期)的同意书撤回和拒绝签署的比例。

结果

搜索共得到 111 项 COVID-19 RCT 和 49 项非 COVID-19 RCT。其中,39 项(35.13%)COVID-19 RCT 和 11 项(22.45%)非 COVID-19 RCT 最终纳入分析。在 39 项 COVID-19 RCT 中,共发生 770/17759(4.3%)例同意书撤回和 100/7607(1.31%)例同意书拒绝签署。COVID-19 RCT 与非 COVID-19 RCT 之间的同意书撤回比例存在显著差异[4.3%比 11.9%,p < 0.0001],与两个历史对照(4.3%比 8.6%,p < 0.0001 和 4.3%比 21.1%,p < 0.0001)相比也存在显著差异。

结论

COVID-19 大流行期间进行的 RCT 与大流行期间的非 COVID-19 RCT 以及非大流行时期进行的 RCT 相比,同意书撤回的比例显著降低。

相似文献

3
Proposals to Conduct Randomized Controlled Trials Without Informed Consent: a Narrative Review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1511-1518. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3780-5. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
4
Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843.
5
Reopening schools safely in the face of COVID-19: Can cluster randomized trials help?
Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;18(3):371-376. doi: 10.1177/1740774520984860. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized-controlled trials: implications for informed consent.
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):670-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00792.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
8
Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):333-341. doi: 10.1177/1740774517703057. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
COVID-19: Pitfalls in Offering Research Participation as Therapy in Clinical Settings.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):3359-3360. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06158-6. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
10
Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials.
Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;17(3):253-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774519896799. Epub 2020 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Awareness, and Practices among Consumers Regarding Trans-Fat: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Indian J Community Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;47(1):107-110. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1265_21. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Repurposing drugs for the management of COVID-19.
Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2021 Apr;31(4):295-307. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2021.1861248. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
2
Ethical Challenges in Clinical Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10045-4. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults With Early COVID-19 : A Randomized Trial.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 20;173(8):623-631. doi: 10.7326/M20-4207. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):517-525. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2016638. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验