Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G. S. Medical College and K. E. M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
J Postgrad Med. 2021 Jul-Sep;67(3):134-138. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_77_21.
We evaluated the extent of consent declines and consent withdrawals during the COVID-19 pandemic as seen in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compared it with non-COVID-19 RCTs published at the same time and two historical controls.
PubMed/Medline only was searched using key-word "COVID-19" and "RCTs" separately, and filtered for COVID-19 RCTs and non-COVID-19 RCTs respectively, published during a nine-month period (1 Feb - 1 Nov 2020). Exclusions were study protocols, observational studies, interim analysis of RCT data and RCTs with missing data. Primary outcome measures were the proportion of consent declines and consent withdrawals as percentage of total participants screened and randomized respectively in COVID-19 RCTs. We compared consent declines and consent withdrawals of COVID-19 RCTs with non-COVID-19 RCTs and two earlier studies on the same topic that served as historical controls (non-pandemic setting).
The search yielded a total of 111 COVID-19 RCTs and 49 non-COVID-19 RCTs. Of these, 39 (35.13%) COVID-19 RCTs and 11 (22.45%) non-COVID-19 RCTs were finally analysed. A total of 770/17759 (4.3%) consent declines and 100/7607 (1.31%) consent withdrawals were seen in 39 COVID-19 RCTs. A significant difference was observed in consent declines between COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 RCTs [4.3% vs 11.9%, p < 0.0001] and between COVID-19 RCTs vs two historical controls [(4.3% vs 8.6%, p < 0.0001) and (4.3% vs 21.1%, p < 0.0001), respectively].
RCTs conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic appear to have significantly lower consent declines relative to non-COVID-19 RCTs during pandemic and RCTs conducted in non-pandemic settings.
评估 COVID-19 大流行期间已发表的随机对照试验(RCT)中同意书撤回和拒绝签署的比例,并与同期发表的非 COVID-19 RCT 以及两个历史对照进行比较。
仅在 PubMed/Medline 上使用关键字“COVID-19”和“RCTs”分别进行搜索,并分别过滤出 COVID-19 RCT 和非 COVID-19 RCT,发表时间为 9 个月(2020 年 2 月 1 日至 11 月 1 日)。排除研究方案、观察性研究、RCT 数据的中期分析以及数据缺失的 RCT。主要观察指标是 COVID-19 RCT 中同意书撤回和拒绝签署的比例,分别为筛选和随机分组的总人数的百分比。我们比较了 COVID-19 RCT 与非 COVID-19 RCT 以及两个关于同一主题的更早的历史对照(非大流行时期)的同意书撤回和拒绝签署的比例。
搜索共得到 111 项 COVID-19 RCT 和 49 项非 COVID-19 RCT。其中,39 项(35.13%)COVID-19 RCT 和 11 项(22.45%)非 COVID-19 RCT 最终纳入分析。在 39 项 COVID-19 RCT 中,共发生 770/17759(4.3%)例同意书撤回和 100/7607(1.31%)例同意书拒绝签署。COVID-19 RCT 与非 COVID-19 RCT 之间的同意书撤回比例存在显著差异[4.3%比 11.9%,p < 0.0001],与两个历史对照(4.3%比 8.6%,p < 0.0001 和 4.3%比 21.1%,p < 0.0001)相比也存在显著差异。
COVID-19 大流行期间进行的 RCT 与大流行期间的非 COVID-19 RCT 以及非大流行时期进行的 RCT 相比,同意书撤回的比例显著降低。