Emanuel Ezekiel J, Boyle Connor W
Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843.
Informed consent is a fundamental element of research ethics. The COVID-19 vaccine trials are high profile trials that have enrolled more than 100 000 participants. Consent documents must be succinct and understandable to ensure informed voluntary participation.
To assess how well informed consent documents of the COVID-19 vaccine trials achieve the ideal of being succinct and understandable, and to create a shorter, more readable document.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study collected and analyzed the informed consent documents used in 4 COVID-19 vaccine phase III randomized clinical trials to quantitatively assess readability and length and, based on this analysis, created a measurably more accessible informed consent document. Analysis was conducted from October 2020 to January 2021.
The main outcomes were number of words (measured as word count), time-to-read (measured at reading speeds of 175-300 words per minute), language complexity (measured using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level assessment), and readability (measured using Flesch Reading Ease Score). Secondary outcomes included clarity of how the placebo group could access the vaccine if it is proven safe and effective. The study also examined the length and readability of an improved consent document.
The 4 informed consent documents were a mean (range) of 8333 (7821 to 9340) words long, with a mean (range) 35 (32.6 to 38.9) minutes to read at 240 words per minute. All documents exceeded grade 9 language complexity and scored lower than 60 in the formal reading ease metric, which constitutes difficult. Only 1 document specified that participants in the placebo group might receive vaccine. It was possible to write a document in fewer than 3000 words with a grade 7 to 8 reading level and a formal readability score that was not difficult.
These findings suggest that existing COVID-19 vaccine informed consent documents were too long, difficult to read, and exceeded grade 9 in language complexity. It was possible to create a shorter, more readable informed consent document for these trials.
知情同意是研究伦理的基本要素。新冠疫苗试验是备受瞩目的试验,已招募了超过10万名参与者。同意书必须简洁易懂,以确保知情自愿参与。
评估新冠疫苗试验的知情同意书在实现简洁易懂这一理想方面的程度,并创建一份更简短、更易读的文件。
设计、背景和参与者:这项质量改进研究收集并分析了4项新冠疫苗III期随机临床试验中使用的知情同意书,以定量评估可读性和长度,并基于此分析创建了一份明显更易理解的知情同意书。分析于2020年10月至2021年1月进行。
主要结局包括单词数量(以字数衡量)、阅读时间(以每分钟175 - 300个单词的阅读速度衡量)、语言复杂度(使用弗莱什 - 金凯德年级水平评估衡量)和可读性(使用弗莱什阅读简易度评分衡量)。次要结局包括如果安慰剂组被证明安全有效,其如何获得疫苗的说明清晰度。该研究还检查了改进后的同意书文件的长度和可读性。
这4份知情同意书平均(范围)长度为8333(7821至9340)个单词,以每分钟240个单词的速度阅读平均(范围)需要35(32.6至38.9)分钟。所有文件的语言复杂度均超过9年级,在正式阅读简易度指标中得分低于60,这属于难读懂的范畴。只有1份文件明确指出安慰剂组的参与者可能会接种疫苗。可以撰写一份字数少于3000个、阅读水平为7至8年级且正式可读性评分不难的文件。
这些发现表明,现有的新冠疫苗知情同意书太长、难读,且语言复杂度超过9年级。为这些试验创建一份更简短、更易读的知情同意书是可行的。