• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Excellence in medical training: developing talent-not sorting it.卓越的医学培训:培养人才而非选拔人才。
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Dec;10(6):356-361. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00678-5. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
2
Sparking Change: How a Shift to Step 1 Pass/Fail Scoring Could Promote the Educational and Catalytic Effects of Assessment in Medical Education.激发变革:如何将 Step 1 成绩转换为通过/不通过评分,以促进医学教育中的评估的教育和催化作用。
Acad Med. 2020 Sep;95(9):1315-1317. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003515.
3
Does changing from a teacher-centered to a learner-centered context promote self-regulated learning: a qualitative study in a Japanese undergraduate setting.从以教师为中心转变为以学习者为中心的环境是否能促进自主学习:日本本科环境下的一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 17;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1550-x.
4
Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.探讨实习后 USMLE 步骤 1 成绩的预测因素。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):330-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1721293. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Educational programs in US medical schools.美国医学院校的教育项目。
JAMA. 1991 Aug 21;266(7):913-20.
6
Student-teacher education programme (STEP) by step: transforming medical students into competent, confident teachers.循序渐进的学生-教师教育计划(STEP):将医学生转变为有能力、有信心的教师。
Med Teach. 2014 Apr;36(4):322-32. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.887835. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
7
Re-imaging Clinical Education: The Interdependence of the Self-Regulated Clinical Teacher and Nursing Student.重新想象临床教育:自我调节临床教师与护理学生的相互依存关系。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2020 Feb 7;17(1):/j/ijnes.2020.17.issue-1/ijnes-2019-0056/ijnes-2019-0056.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2019-0056.
8
Competency-Based Medical Education in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: A Report From the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Undergraduate Medical Education Task Force.以能力为基础的内科学实习医学教育:学术医学联盟本科生医学教育工作组的报告。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):421-427. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001896.
9
Implementing Systematic Faculty Development to Support an EPA-Based Program of Assessment: Strategies, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned.实施系统的教师发展计划以支持基于 EPA 的评估计划:策略、结果和经验教训。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(4):434-444. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1857256. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
10
Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors.美国医学院校的盆腔和乳房检查技能课程:妇产科临床实习主任的一项调查
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rollercoaster of Grades Versus Growth in the Clerkship Year: A Phenomenological Study of Medical Student Experience with Competency Development.实习学年中成绩与成长的过山车之旅:一项关于医学生能力发展体验的现象学研究
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Nov 25;13(1):592-601. doi: 10.5334/pme.1564. eCollection 2024.
2
Reimagining the Psychiatry Clerkship: The Washington University School of Medicine Story.重新构想精神科实习:华盛顿大学医学院的故事。
Acad Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;48(3):268-272. doi: 10.1007/s40596-024-01964-0. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Transition From Normative to Criterion-Based Grading in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship.妇产科实习中从规范性评分到基于标准的评分的转变
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Mar 18;11:23821205241239201. doi: 10.1177/23821205241239201. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Call for Action: Undergraduate Medical Education Assessment-Advocating for a Transition From Tiered to Competency-Based Grading.行动呼吁:本科医学教育评估——倡导从分层评分向基于能力的评分转变。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023 Oct 16;10:23821205231207696. doi: 10.1177/23821205231207696. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

卓越的医学培训:培养人才而非选拔人才。

Excellence in medical training: developing talent-not sorting it.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Medical Service, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Dec;10(6):356-361. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00678-5. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-021-00678-5
PMID:34415554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377327/
Abstract

Many medical schools have reconsidered or eliminated clerkship grades and honor society memberships. National testing organizations announced plans to eliminate numerical scoring for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 in favor of pass/fail results. These changes have led some faculty to wonder: "How will we recognize and reward excellence?" Excellence in undergraduate medical education has long been defined by high grades, top test scores, honor society memberships, and publication records. However, this model of learner excellence is misaligned with how students learn or what society values. This accolade-driven view of excellence is perpetuated by assessments that are based on gestalt impressions influenced by similarity between evaluators and students, and assessments that are often restricted to a limited number of traditional skill domains. To achieve a new model of learner excellence that values the trainee's achievement, growth, and responsiveness to feedback across multiple domains, we must envision a new model of teacher excellence. Such teachers would have a growth mindset toward assessing competencies and learning new competencies. Actualizing true learner excellence will require teachers to change from evaluators who conduct assessments of learning to coaches who do assessment for learning. Schools will also need to establish policies and structures that foster a culture that supports this change. In this new paradigm, a teacher's core duty is to develop talent rather than sort it.

摘要

许多医学院校已经重新考虑或取消了实习成绩和荣誉学会会员资格。国家考试组织宣布计划取消美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步的数字评分,改为通过/不通过的结果。这些变化使得一些教师想知道:“我们将如何识别和奖励卓越?”本科医学教育的卓越长期以来一直被定义为高成绩、高分、荣誉学会会员资格和发表记录。然而,这种以学习者卓越为导向的模式与学生的学习方式或社会的价值观不一致。这种以表彰为导向的卓越观念是通过基于评估者和学生之间相似性的整体印象评估以及通常仅限于有限的传统技能领域的评估来维持的。为了实现重视学员在多个领域的成就、成长和对反馈的反应的新模式,我们必须设想一种新的教师卓越模式。这种教师应该对评估能力和学习新能力持有成长型思维。要实现真正的学习者卓越,教师必须从进行学习评估的评估者转变为进行评估以促进学习的教练。学校还需要制定政策和结构,培养支持这种变革的文化。在这个新的范例中,教师的核心职责是发展人才,而不是对其进行分类。