Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, & School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China.
Department of Psychology, School of Education, Guangdong University of Education, No.351 XinGangZhong Road, 510303 Guangzhou, PR China.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a serious public health concern among adolescents. However, adolescents with different combinations of NSSI risk factors may constitute different subgroups that vary in subsequent risks of NSSI engagement, and the membership in these subgroups may change during early adolescence. Gender differences related to risk profiles and transition patterns may also exist. This study thus aimed to address these three questions.
A total of 2,942 participants ranging from 12 to 17 years old (55.2% females; M = 14.60, SD = 1.21) completed a series of questionnaires about NSSI and its risk factors on three occasions, every six months. Latent profile and latent transition analyses were used to examine NSSI risk profiles (subgroups), their transition patterns, and gender differences.
Three distinct risk profiles were identified: Low-risk profile, Medium-risk profile, and High-risk profile. The profile membership was fairly stable over one year, and the shift across profiles represented a "resilient" pattern. Regarding gender differences, boys were less likely to be in either the Medium- or the High-risk groups, but more likely to transition from the Medium- to the Low-risk group, relative to girls.
This study relied upon self-report measures. Additional research is needed to investigate the generalizability of the results to other populations, and to examine more predictors of class membership and transitions.
The results highlight the importance of considering subgroup differences in understanding NSSI risks. Differentiated interventions with multi-pronged approaches tailoring to different risk classes and gender groups may therefore prove more efficient and effective.
非自杀性自伤(NSSI)是青少年中一个严重的公共卫生问题。然而,具有不同 NSSI 风险因素组合的青少年可能构成不同的亚组,这些亚组在随后的 NSSI 参与风险方面存在差异,并且这些亚组的成员身份可能在青春期早期发生变化。与风险特征和转变模式相关的性别差异也可能存在。因此,本研究旨在回答这三个问题。
共有 2942 名年龄在 12 至 17 岁之间的参与者(女性占 55.2%;M=14.60,SD=1.21),他们在三年内三次,每六个月完成一次关于 NSSI 及其风险因素的一系列问卷。使用潜在剖面和潜在转变分析来检查 NSSI 风险特征(亚组)、它们的转变模式以及性别差异。
确定了三个不同的风险特征:低风险特征、中风险特征和高风险特征。在一年多的时间里,特征成员身份相对稳定,而跨特征的转变代表了一种“有弹性”的模式。关于性别差异,与女孩相比,男孩不太可能处于中风险或高风险组,但更有可能从中风险组转变为低风险组。
本研究依赖于自我报告的措施。需要进一步的研究来调查结果在其他人群中的可推广性,并检查更多的类别成员和转变的预测因素。
结果强调了考虑亚组差异在理解 NSSI 风险中的重要性。因此,针对不同风险类别和性别群体的差异化干预措施,采用多管齐下的方法,可能会更有效。