Roshdy A, Elsayed A S, Saleh A S
Intensive Care Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK; Critical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Intensive Care Unit, King Fahd Military Medical Complex, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug 17. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2021.06.006.
Exploring infectious diseases (ID) practice in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to identify gaps and opportunities.
Online international survey (PRACT-INF-ICU) endorsed by the ESICM and open from July 30, 2019 to October 19, 2019.
International study conducted in 78 countries.
Physicians working in ICU.
None.
Practice variations were assessed according to respondents' countries income class, training, and years of practice. Univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression were used to estimate associations between respondents' characteristics and their perceptions regarding adequacy of training.
466 intensivists with a median practice of 10 years (interquartile range, 5-19) completed the survey. A third reported no antimicrobial stewardship program and 40% had no regular microbiological rounds in their ICUs. Intensivists were mostly the decision makers for the initial antimicrobial therapy which in 70% of cases were based on guidelines or protocols. Non-ICU expertise were sought more frequently on reviewing (48/72h, culture adjustment and discontinuation in 32%, 39% and 21% respectively) rather than antimicrobial therapy initiation (16%). Only 42% described ID training as adequate. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression showed that low- to middle-income countries (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.61), ICU practice ≤10 years (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39-0.79), and dual training with anaesthesia (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34-0.79) or medicine (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.76) were associated with less training satisfaction.
ID practice is heterogeneous across ICUs while antimicrobial stewardship program is not universally implemented. From intensivists' perspective, ID training and knowledge need improvement.
探索重症监护病房(ICU)中的传染病(ID)诊疗实践,以找出差距和机会。
由欧洲重症医学学会(ESICM)认可的在线国际调查(PRACT-INF-ICU),于2019年7月30日至2019年10月19日开放。
在78个国家进行的国际研究。
在ICU工作的医生。
无。
根据受访者所在国家的收入类别、培训情况和执业年限评估诊疗实践差异。采用单因素和多因素有序逻辑回归来估计受访者特征与其对培训充分性的看法之间的关联。
466名中位执业年限为10年(四分位间距为5 - 19年)的重症医学专家完成了调查。三分之一的人报告其所在ICU没有抗菌药物管理计划,40%的人所在ICU没有定期的微生物学查房。重症医学专家大多是初始抗菌治疗的决策者,其中70%的情况是基于指南或方案。在进行复查(48/72小时)、调整培养方案和停用抗菌药物方面(分别为32%、39%和21%),向非ICU专家咨询的频率高于抗菌治疗起始阶段(16%)。只有42%的人认为ID培训充分。多因素有序逻辑回归显示,低收入至中等收入国家(比值比:0.41,95%置信区间:0.28 - 0.61)、ICU执业年限≤10年(比值比:0.55,95%置信区间:0.39 - 0.79)以及同时接受麻醉(比值比:0.52,95%置信区间:0.34 - 0.79)或内科(比值比:0.49,95%置信区间:0.32 - 0.76)双重培训与培训满意度较低相关。
各ICU之间的ID诊疗实践存在差异,而抗菌药物管理计划并未普遍实施。从重症医学专家的角度来看,ID培训和知识需要改进。