Suppr超能文献

当前淋巴结分期系统在各类胰腺癌中的预测性能

Predictive Performance of Current Nodal Staging Systems in Various Categories of Pancreatic Cancer.

作者信息

Lee Woohyung, Lee Jung Bok, Hong Sarang, Park Yejong, Kwak Bong Jun, Jun Eunsung, Song Ki Byung, Lee Jae Hoon, Hwang Dae Wook, Kim Song Cheol

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan;29(1):390-398. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10641-7. Epub 2021 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nodal staging systems (NSS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) classify patients on the basis of number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLN), metastatic/retrieved lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive LN (LODDS). The relative prognostic performance of these NSS, however, remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 2584 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC between 2010 and 2019. Subgroups of each staging system were classified using K-adaptive partitioning method and assessed by comparing time-dependent areas under the curve (AUC) 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients were subgrouped by MLN (0, 1-3, ≥ 4), LNR (0, 0-0.23, > 0.23), and LODDS (< - 3.5, - 3.5 to - 0.970, > - 0.97). All three NSS were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The AUCs for OS were comparable for the MLN (0.622), LNR (0.609), and LODDS (0.596) systems. Subgroup evaluation based on 12 retrieved lymph nodes (RLN), R1 resection, and extent of resection showed that the AUCs of the MLN and LNR NSS were comparable for OS and RFS regardless of the number of RLNs, R1 resection, and extent of resection. By contrast, the AUCs of the LODDS NSS were lower.

CONCLUSION

The NSS based on the number of MLN is the best prognostic indicator, with prognostic performance comparable to the other NSS and greater convenience for practical use. This NSS was applicable regardless of the numbers of RLN, R1 resection, and extent of resection.

摘要

背景

胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的淋巴结分期系统(NSS)根据转移淋巴结数量(MLN)、转移/获取淋巴结比率(LNR)以及阳性淋巴结的对数优势(LODDS)对患者进行分类。然而,这些NSS的相对预后性能仍不清楚。

患者与方法

我们确定了2010年至2019年间接受PDAC手术的2584例患者。使用K自适应划分方法对每个分期系统的亚组进行分类,并通过比较术后5年的时间依赖性曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。

结果

患者按MLN(0、1 - 3、≥4)、LNR(0、0 - 0.23、>0.23)和LODDS(<-3.5、-3.5至-0.970、>-0.97)进行亚组划分。所有三种NSS都是总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)的独立预后因素。MLN(0.622)、LNR(0.609)和LODDS(0.596)系统的OS的AUC相当。基于12个获取淋巴结(RLN)、R1切除和切除范围的亚组评估表明,无论RLN数量、R1切除和切除范围如何,MLN和LNR NSS的OS和RFS的AUC相当。相比之下,LODDS NSS的AUC较低。

结论

基于MLN数量的NSS是最佳的预后指标,其预后性能与其他NSS相当,且在实际应用中更方便。无论RLN数量、R1切除和切除范围如何,该NSS均适用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验