Department of Psychology and Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;14(1):e1574. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1574. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Conceptual fragmentation is when a term assumed to have one meaning is found to have many. When these different definitions overlap in meaning and application confusion and wasted effort follows. "Attention" is such a fragmented term. The response to conceptual fragmentation is simple. Stop using the original term. Our reticence to do so reflects false beliefs about attention. "Attention" is not an old term, but a modern one. Its original meaning is not related to our contemporary intuitions. Attention is not a necessary concept; psychology made substantial progress, even in cognitive areas, during the years when its use was banished. Attention is just one among many examples of conceptual fragmentation in psychology. The root cause is a dearth of theory driving cognitive experimentation. Theoretical clarity is enhanced when fundamental concepts can be expressed in a mathematical form. When theories are stated in mathematical language it opens the door to rigorous cross-domain comparisons using tools like category theory. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Attention Neuroscience > Cognition.
概念碎片化是指一个术语原本被认为只有一个含义,却发现实际上有多个含义。当这些不同的定义在含义和应用上重叠时,就会出现混淆和浪费精力的情况。“注意力”就是这样一个碎片化的术语。应对概念碎片化的方法很简单。停止使用原始术语。我们之所以不愿意这样做,反映了我们对注意力的错误信念。“注意力”不是一个古老的术语,而是一个现代术语。它最初的含义与我们当代的直觉无关。注意力不是一个必要的概念;在禁止使用它的那些年里,心理学在认知领域取得了实质性的进展。注意力只是心理学中概念碎片化的众多例子之一。其根本原因是缺乏推动认知实验的理论。当基本概念可以用数学形式表达时,理论的清晰度就会提高。当理论用数学语言表述时,就可以利用范畴论等工具对跨领域的严谨比较打开大门。本文属于以下类别: 心理学 > 注意 神经科学 > 认知。