Suppr超能文献

大弯、中心线或拉直的中心线长度——哪种长度在胸主动脉腔内修复术前规划中最准确?

Greater Curvature, Centerline or Straightened Centerline Length - Which length is Most Accurate for Preprocedural Planning in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair?

作者信息

Ojha Vineeta, Ganga Kartik P, Goyal Aayush, Reddy Pradeep Ramakrishnan, Kumar Sanjeev, Sharma Sanjiv

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Radiology and Endovascular Interventions, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;78:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.05.050. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Automated centerline (CL) measurements have been conventionally used for stent-graft length estimation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of greater curvature length (GL), semiautomated CL and straightened centerline length (SCL) for preprocedural planning in TEVAR.

METHODS

Immediate postprocedural CT Angiographies of 30 patients (22 males, age-49.2 ± 10.1years) who underwent TEVAR between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. CL, GL, SCL and the straightline length(SL) were measured between proximal and distal ends of the stent-graft and results were compared with the true length of the stent-graft (TL). Tortuosity index (TI = CL/SL) was calculated.

RESULTS

GL (17.92 ± 4.78 cm) was the closest in predicting the TL (17.75 ± 4.29 cm) (P = 0.414) overall, as well as in both dissection and aneurysm subgroups (P= 0.9). There was a significant difference between CL (16.67 ± 4.07 cm) and TL (P< 0.0001) as well as between SCL (16.86 ± 4.16 cm) and TL (P= 0.001). These differences were greater in dissection subgroup than in the aneurysm group (P< 0.0001 and P= 0.03 for TL-CL and TL-SCL, respectively). The extent of mismatch between GL or CL and TL did not correlate with tortuosity, but the difference between TL and SCL had a significant positive correlation with tortuosity (r = 0.375, P= 0.04). TL-GL had a negative linear correlation with the stent-graft length (TL) in the dissection group (r = 0.50, P= 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The greater curvature length predicts the actual total length of the deployed stent-graft more accurately than centerline or straightened centerline lengths. Hence, it should be used in planning for the length of stent-graft required for TEVAR.

摘要

背景

在胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)期间,传统上一直使用自动中心线(CL)测量来估计支架移植物的长度。本研究的目的是评估大弯长度(GL)、半自动CL和拉直中心线长度(SCL)在TEVAR术前规划中的准确性。

方法

回顾性分析了2015年至2017年间接受TEVAR治疗的30例患者(22例男性,年龄49.2±10.1岁)术后即刻的CT血管造影。测量支架移植物近端和远端之间的CL、GL、SCL和直线长度(SL),并将结果与支架移植物的真实长度(TL)进行比较。计算迂曲指数(TI = CL/SL)。

结果

总体而言,GL(17.92±4.78 cm)在预测TL(17.75±4.29 cm)方面最接近(P = 0.414),在夹层和动脉瘤亚组中也是如此(P = 0.9)。CL(16.67±4.07 cm)与TL之间存在显著差异(P<0.0001),SCL(16.86±4.16 cm)与TL之间也存在显著差异(P = 0.001)。这些差异在夹层亚组中比在动脉瘤组中更大(TL-CL和TL-SCL分别为P<0.0001和P = .03)。GL或CL与TL之间的不匹配程度与迂曲度无关,但TL与SCL之间的差异与迂曲度呈显著正相关(r = 0.375,P = 0.04)。在夹层组中,TL-GL与支架移植物长度(TL)呈负线性相关(r = 0.50,P = 0.)。

结论

大弯长度比中心线或拉直中心线长度更准确地预测已部署支架移植物的实际总长度。因此,它应用于规划TEVAR所需的支架移植物长度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验