Jones Sarah, Novicoff Wendy, Nadeau Julie, Evans Samantha
Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;11(8):2257. doi: 10.3390/ani11082257.
The goal of this study was to formally evaluate the administration of unlicensed, crowd-sourced antiviral GS-441524-like therapy for cats suspected to have feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), a previously fatal disease. Members of a large social media support and GS-441524-like drug distribution group were surveyed via the Internet. The survey was targeted toward owners who had treated their cats for at least 12 weeks with unlicensed GS-441524-like drugs. Of the 393 analyzed surveys which met inclusion criteria, 73.7% of owners utilizing this therapy were from the United States. Only 8.7% of owners reported receiving help from their veterinarian in administering the treatment to their cat. The mean cost of treatment was USD 4920. A majority of owners (88.2%) reported noticeable improvement in clinical signs within one week of initiating therapy. At the time of the survey, 96.7% (380 cats) were alive, with 54.0% of them considered cured and another 43.3% being monitored in the 12-week observation period. A total of 12.7% of the cats suffered a relapse of clinical signs of FIP, and 3.3% of the cats died despite GS-441524-like therapy. Reported complications were mostly related to owner administration of subcutaneous injections of the acidic GS-441525-like therapy, such as vocalization, pain, struggling, and injection-site wounds. Limitations of this study include a retrospective design, bias in case selection, reliance on owner-reported data, and inability to confirm the contents of unlicensed pharmaceuticals; however, important lessons can be learned from the experiences of these owners. While unconventional, and certainly not free from medical and legal risks, unlicensed, at-home GS-441524-like therapy, according to owner reports, can apparently offer benefits in the treatment of cats suspected of FIP.
本研究的目的是正式评估对疑似患有猫传染性腹膜炎(FIP,一种先前的致命疾病)的猫使用未经许可的、众包的抗病毒类GS - 441524疗法的情况。通过互联网对一个大型社交媒体支持和类GS - 441524药物分发群组的成员进行了调查。该调查针对那些用未经许可的类GS - 441524药物治疗其猫至少12周的猫主人。在393份符合纳入标准的分析调查问卷中,使用这种疗法的猫主人有73.7%来自美国。只有8.7%的猫主人报告在给猫进行治疗时得到了兽医的帮助。治疗的平均费用为4920美元。大多数猫主人(88.2%)报告在开始治疗后的一周内临床症状有明显改善。在调查时,96.7%(380只猫)还活着,其中54.0%被认为已治愈,另有43.3%在12周的观察期内接受监测。共有12.7%的猫出现FIP临床症状复发,3.3%的猫尽管接受了类GS - 441524疗法仍死亡。报告的并发症大多与猫主人皮下注射酸性类GS - 441525疗法有关,如发声、疼痛、挣扎和注射部位伤口。本研究的局限性包括回顾性设计、病例选择偏差、依赖猫主人报告的数据以及无法确认未经许可药品的成分;然而,可以从这些猫主人的经历中学到重要的经验教训。尽管不常规,且肯定存在医疗和法律风险,但根据猫主人的报告,未经许可的家庭类GS - 441524疗法显然在治疗疑似FIP的猫方面可能有好处。