Cai Laisi, Liu Dongwei, Ma Ye
Research Academy of Grand Health, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.
School of Information Management and Artificial Intelligence, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 21;9(8):1076. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081076.
Low-cost, portable, and easy-to-use Kinect-based systems achieved great popularity in out-of-the-lab motion analysis. The placement of a Kinect sensor significantly influences the accuracy in measuring kinematic parameters for dynamics tasks. We conducted an experiment to investigate the impact of sensor placement on the accuracy of upper limb kinematics during a typical upper limb functional task, the drinking task. Using a 3D motion capture system as the golden standard, we tested twenty-one Kinect positions with three different distances and seven orientations. Upper limb joint angles, including shoulder flexion/extension, shoulder adduction/abduction, shoulder internal/external rotation, and elbow flexion/extension angles, are calculated via our developed Kinect kinematic model and the UWA kinematic model for both the Kinect-based system and the 3D motion capture system. We extracted the angles at the point of the target achieved (PTA). The mean-absolute-error (MEA) with the standard represents the Kinect-based system's performance. We conducted a two-way repeated measure ANOVA to explore the impacts of distance and orientation on the MEAs for all upper limb angles. There is a significant main effect for orientation. The main effects for distance and the interaction effects do not reach statistical significance. The post hoc test using LSD test for orientation shows that the effect of orientation is joint-dependent and plane-dependent. For a complex task (e.g., drinking), which involves body occlusions, placing a Kinect sensor right in front of a subject is not a good choice. We suggest that place a Kinect sensor at the contralateral side of a subject with the orientation around 30∘ to 45∘ for upper limb functional tasks. For all kinds of dynamic tasks, we put forward the following recommendations for the placement of a Kinect sensor. First, set an optimal sensor position for capture, making sure that all investigated joints are visible during the whole task. Second, sensor placement should avoid body occlusion at the maximum extension. Third, if an optimal location cannot be achieved in an out-of-the-lab environment, researchers could put the Kinect sensor at an optimal orientation by trading off the factor of distance. Last, for those need to assess functions of both limbs, the users can relocate the sensor and re-evaluate the functions of the other side once they finish evaluating functions of one side of a subject.
低成本、便携且易于使用的基于Kinect的系统在实验室外的运动分析中广受欢迎。Kinect传感器的放置对动态任务中运动学参数测量的准确性有显著影响。我们进行了一项实验,以研究在典型的上肢功能任务——饮水任务中,传感器放置对上肢运动学准确性的影响。使用三维运动捕捉系统作为黄金标准,我们测试了二十一个Kinect位置,包括三种不同距离和七种方向。通过我们开发的Kinect运动学模型和UWA运动学模型,计算基于Kinect的系统和三维运动捕捉系统的上肢关节角度,包括肩部屈伸、肩部内收/外展、肩部内旋/外旋以及肘部屈伸角度。我们提取了目标达成点(PTA)的角度。基于标准的平均绝对误差(MEA)代表了基于Kinect的系统的性能。我们进行了双向重复测量方差分析,以探讨距离和方向对所有上肢角度MEA的影响。方向存在显著的主效应。距离的主效应和交互效应未达到统计学显著性。使用LSD检验进行的事后检验表明,方向的影响取决于关节和平面。对于涉及身体遮挡的复杂任务(如饮水),将Kinect传感器直接放置在受试者前方不是一个好选择。我们建议,对于上肢功能任务,将Kinect传感器放置在受试者的对侧,方向约为30°至45°。对于各种动态任务,我们对Kinect传感器的放置提出以下建议。首先,设置最佳的传感器捕捉位置,确保在整个任务过程中所有研究的关节都可见。其次,传感器放置应在最大伸展时避免身体遮挡。第三,如果在实验室外环境中无法实现最佳位置,研究人员可以通过权衡距离因素将Kinect传感器放置在最佳方向。最后,对于那些需要评估双侧功能的情况,用户在完成对受试者一侧功能的评估后,可以重新放置传感器并重新评估另一侧的功能。