Suppr超能文献

兔体内的V型凝胶引导气管插管

V-Gel Guided Endotracheal Intubation in Rabbits.

作者信息

Fusco Alessandra, Douglas Hope, Barba Adriana, Hopster Klaus, Stefanovski Darko, Sinder Benjamin, Cahill Patrick J, Snyder Brian, Schaer Thomas P

机构信息

Department of Clinical Studies New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA, United States.

Division of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2021 Aug 10;8:684624. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.684624. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

General anesthesia in rabbits is associated with higher morbidity and mortality relative to other mammalian species commonly anesthetized. Unique challenges related to endotracheal intubation (ETI) in rabbits contribute to this risk. To improve the safety of ETI in rabbits, we developed two new ETI methods using a supraglottic airway device (v-gel) to facilitate ETI and compared them to traditional "blind" technique. We hypothesized that relative to blind ETI, v-gel guided ETI provides more successful placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in a shorter time. Outcomes included number of intubation attempts, time for achievement of ETI, endoscopic findings, and serial arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. Prospective, randomized, and crossover study. Ten female, New Zealand White rabbits aged 1-2 years old, weighing 4.3 ± 0.4 kg, were anesthetized four times. Each time, ETI was performed with one of the following techniques: Method 1: v-gel guided, polypropylene catheter facilitated, intubation using a cuffed ETT; Method 2: v-gel guided intubation using an uncuffed ETT directly inserted through the device airway channel; Method 3 and 4: Blind intubation with uncuffed or cuffed ETT. Upper airway endoscopy was performed before intubation attempts and after extubation. Serial ABG analysis was performed during the peri-intubation process. V-gel guided techniques allowed successful ETI on the initial attempt for 9/10 subjects using Method 1 and 10/10 using Method 2. Relative to the v-gel guided techniques, the blind techniques required more intubation attempts. A median of 2 attempts (range 1-4, < 0.007) were required for the uncuffed ETT, and a median of 4 (range 1-4, < 0.001) attempts were performed for the cuffed ETT. The time to perform successful ETI was positively correlated with the number of attempts (ρ = 0.82), while successful ETI was negatively correlated with number of attempts (ρ = -0.82). Endoscopic findings showed mild to moderate laryngeal trauma. In the absence of oxygen supplementation, ABG analysis demonstrated low PaO, while PaCO remained consistent. Facilitated ETI using the v-gel guided techniques allows for the rapid establishment of a secure airway to provide ventilatory support for rabbits undergoing general anesthesia.

摘要

与其他常用麻醉的哺乳动物相比,家兔全身麻醉的发病率和死亡率更高。家兔气管插管(ETI)相关的独特挑战导致了这种风险。为了提高家兔ETI的安全性,我们开发了两种使用声门上气道装置(v-gel)促进ETI的新方法,并将它们与传统的“盲插”技术进行比较。我们假设,相对于盲插ETI,v-gel引导的ETI能在更短时间内更成功地放置气管内导管(ETT)。结果包括插管尝试次数、实现ETI的时间、内镜检查结果和连续动脉血气(ABG)分析。前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。十只1-2岁、体重4.3±0.4千克的雌性新西兰白兔接受了四次麻醉。每次使用以下技术之一进行ETI:方法1:v-gel引导,聚丙烯导管辅助,使用带套囊ETT插管;方法2:v-gel引导,直接通过装置气道通道插入无套囊ETT进行插管;方法3和4:无套囊或带套囊ETT盲插。在插管尝试前和拔管后进行上气道内镜检查。在围插管过程中进行连续ABG分析。v-gel引导技术使9/10的受试对象使用方法1首次尝试即成功完成ETI,10/10的受试对象使用方法2首次尝试即成功完成ETI。相对于v-gel引导技术,盲插技术需要更多的插管尝试。无套囊ETT的插管尝试中位数为2次(范围1-4次,<0.007),带套囊ETT的插管尝试中位数为4次(范围1-4次,<0.001)。成功完成ETI的时间与尝试次数呈正相关(ρ=0.82),而成功完成ETI与尝试次数呈负相关(ρ=-0.82)。内镜检查结果显示有轻度至中度的喉部创伤。在未补充氧气的情况下,ABG分析显示动脉血氧分压(PaO)降低,而动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO)保持稳定。使用v-gel引导技术辅助ETI能够快速建立安全气道,为接受全身麻醉的家兔提供通气支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df6e/8383107/4fc2e034ba2e/fvets-08-684624-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验