Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Disease, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE39QP, UK.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Feb 3;28(17):1953-1960. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab132.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study assessed the risks and benefits of aspirin in the primary prevention of CVD in individuals with CKD.
Ovid MEDLINE was searched from 2015 to 15th of September 2020 to include randomized controlled trials that assessed aspirin versus placebo in adults with non-end stage CKD without a previous diagnosis of CVD. A pre-specified protocol was registered with PROSPERO (identification number CRD42014008860). A random effects model was used to calculate a pooled hazard ratio (HR), pooled risk difference, and the number needed to treat or harm (NNT/NNH). The primary endpoint was CVD. Secondary endpoints included: all-cause mortality; coronary heart disease; stroke; and major and minor bleeding events. Five trials were identified (n = 7852 total, n = 3935 aspirin, n = 3917 placebo). Overall, 434 CVD events occurred. There was no statistically significant reduction in CVD events (HR 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.08; P = 0.13, I2 = 63%), all-cause mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19; P = 0.60, I2 = 21%), coronary heart disease events (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.27-1.63; P = 0.37, I2 = 64%) or stroke (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.6-1.27; P = 0.48, I2 = 24%) from aspirin therapy. The risk of major bleeding events were increased by approximately 50% (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.13-2.05; P = 0.01, I2 = 0%) and minor bleeding events were more than doubled (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.64-4.23; P < 0.01, I2 = 0%).
Aspirin cannot be routinely recommended for the primary prevention of CVD in individuals with CKD as there is no evidence for its benefit but there is an increased risk of bleeding.
心血管疾病(CVD)是慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。本研究评估了阿司匹林在 CKD 患者 CVD 一级预防中的风险和获益。
从 2015 年至 2020 年 9 月 15 日,通过 Ovid MEDLINE 检索评估阿司匹林与安慰剂在无 CVD 既往诊断的非终末期 CKD 成人中的随机对照试验。预先设定了 PROSPERO 方案(注册号 CRD42014008860)。使用随机效应模型计算合并的危险比(HR)、合并风险差和需要治疗或危害的人数(NNT/NNH)。主要终点为 CVD。次要终点包括:全因死亡率;冠心病;卒中和大出血及小出血事件。共纳入 5 项试验(总计 7852 例患者,阿司匹林组 3935 例,安慰剂组 3917 例)。共有 434 例发生 CVD 事件。阿司匹林组 CVD 事件发生率无统计学显著降低(HR 0.76,95%CI 0.54-1.08;P=0.13,I2=63%),全因死亡率(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.74-1.19;P=0.60,I2=21%),冠心病事件(HR 0.66,95%CI 0.27-1.63;P=0.37,I2=64%)或卒中等(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.6-1.27;P=0.48,I2=24%)发生率也无统计学显著差异。阿司匹林治疗组大出血事件风险增加约 50%(HR 1.53,95%CI 1.13-2.05;P=0.01,I2=0%),小出血事件风险增加一倍以上(HR 2.64,95%CI 1.64-4.23;P<0.01,I2=0%)。
由于没有获益证据,且存在出血风险增加,阿司匹林不能常规推荐用于 CKD 患者 CVD 的一级预防。