• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间预期调节刺激-反应整合。

Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, DE-54296, Trier, Germany.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):221-230. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7
PMID:34449072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8794897/
Abstract

We can use information derived from passing time to anticipate an upcoming event. If time before an event varies, responses towards this event become faster with increasing waiting time. This variable-foreperiod effect has been often observed in response-speed studies. Different action control frameworks assume that response and stimulus features are integrated into an event file that is retrieved later if features repeat. Yet the role of foreperiods has so far not been investigated in action control. Thus, we investigated the influence of foreperiod on the integration of action-perception features. Participants worked through a standard distractor-response binding paradigm where two consecutive responses are made towards target letters while distractor letters are present. Responses and/or distractors can repeat or change from first to second display, leading to partial repetition costs when only some features repeat or repetition benefits when all features repeat (the difference constituting distractor-response binding). To investigate the effect of foreperiod, we also introduced an anti-geometric distribution of foreperiods to the time interval before the first response display. We observed that distractor-response binding increased with increasing foreperiod duration, and speculate that this was driven by an increase in motor readiness induced by temporal expectancy.

摘要

我们可以利用流逝的时间信息来预测即将发生的事件。如果事件前的时间发生变化,随着等待时间的增加,对该事件的反应会变得更快。这种可变预期限效应在反应速度研究中经常被观察到。不同的动作控制框架假设,反应和刺激特征被整合到一个事件文件中,如果特征重复,则稍后会检索该文件。然而,到目前为止,预期限在动作控制中的作用还没有被研究过。因此,我们研究了预期限对动作感知特征整合的影响。参与者完成了一个标准的分心反应绑定范式,在该范式中,当目标字母出现时,他们会朝着目标字母连续做出两个反应,而分心字母则会出现。在第一显示和第二显示之间,反应和/或分心物可以重复或改变,当只有一些特征重复时会产生部分重复成本,而当所有特征重复时会产生重复收益(差异构成分心反应绑定)。为了研究预期限的影响,我们还在第一个反应显示之前的时间间隔引入了反几何分布的预期限。我们观察到,分心反应绑定随着预期限持续时间的增加而增加,我们推测这是由时间预期引起的运动准备增加所驱动的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61af/8794897/6e75b5c2a3c1/13414_2021_2361_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61af/8794897/413e50589c84/13414_2021_2361_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61af/8794897/eb607e5130de/13414_2021_2361_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61af/8794897/6e75b5c2a3c1/13414_2021_2361_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61af/8794897/413e50589c84/13414_2021_2361_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61af/8794897/eb607e5130de/13414_2021_2361_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61af/8794897/6e75b5c2a3c1/13414_2021_2361_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.时间预期调节刺激-反应整合。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):221-230. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
2
Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.反应特定时间预期:来自可变前周期范式的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Oct;73(7):2309-22. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0179-6.
3
The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.时间预期的特异性:来自可变前周期范式的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Dec;64(12):2289-300. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.616212. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
4
Predictability reduces event file retrieval.可预测性降低事件文件检索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1073-1087. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02637-6. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Revisiting variable-foreperiod effects: evaluating the repetition priming account.重新审视变时距效应:评估重复启动理论的解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1193-1207. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02476-5. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
6
Weakness and instability of time expectancy in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者时间预期的薄弱与不稳定。
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Jan;34(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:1<37::aid-jclp2270340107>3.0.co;2-d.
7
Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.剖析刺激-反应联结效应:按颜色分组分别影响整合与提取过程。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1474-1488. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1526-7.
8
The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.无关刺激的代表性水平——感觉内和感觉间的分心反应绑定。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):2256-2266. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02249-6. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
Only time will tell the future: Anticipatory saccades reveal the temporal dynamics of time-based location and task expectancy.只有时间才能揭示未来:预期性扫视揭示了基于时间的位置和任务预期的时间动态。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1183-1200. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000850. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
Increased Automaticity and Altered Temporal Preparation Following Sleep Deprivation.睡眠剥夺后自动性增加及时间准备改变。
Sleep. 2015 Aug 1;38(8):1219-27. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4896.

引用本文的文献

1
Binding of the feature in the auditory domain: S-R or S-S binding; or both?听觉领域中特征的绑定:刺激-反应(S-R)绑定还是刺激-刺激(S-S)绑定;或者两者皆有?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Oct 23:17470218241287190. doi: 10.1177/17470218241287190.
2
Predictability reduces event file retrieval.可预测性降低事件文件检索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1073-1087. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02637-6. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Binding time: Investigations on the integration of visual stimulus duration.绑定时间:视觉刺激持续时间整合的研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Only time will tell the future: Anticipatory saccades reveal the temporal dynamics of time-based location and task expectancy.只有时间才能揭示未来:预期性扫视揭示了基于时间的位置和任务预期的时间动态。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1183-1200. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000850. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC).动作控制中的绑定与检索(BRAC)。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 May;24(5):375-387. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2312-2328. doi: 10.1177/17470218221140751. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
4
What Belongs Together Retrieves Together - The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval.同属之物共同提取——知觉分组在刺激-反应联结及提取中的作用
J Cogn. 2022 Apr 12;5(1):28. doi: 10.5334/joc.217. eCollection 2022.
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
4
Short-term effects on temporal judgement: Sequential drivers of interval bisection and reproduction.对时间判断的短期影响:间隔二等分和再现的顺序驱动因素
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Time-based expectancy in temporally structured task switching.时间结构化任务切换中的基于时间的期望
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jun;44(6):856-870. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000494. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
The effect of phasic auditory alerting on visual perception.阶段性听觉警报对视觉感知的影响。
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Hazard versus history: Temporal preparation is driven by past experience.风险与历史:时间准备受过去经验驱动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jan;43(1):78-88. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000279. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.干扰项-反应联结的结构:构型与元素整合的条件
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Apr;42(4):464-79. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000158. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.优先级地图的内容、位置及原理,以及它们与视觉工作记忆的相互作用。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339(1):154-64. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12606. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
10
Temporal predictability facilitates action, not perception.时间可预测性有助于行动,而不是感知。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1335-40. doi: 10.1177/0956797612469411. Epub 2013 May 22.