• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多模式干预预防成人外周静脉导管失败(PREBACP):一项多中心、整群随机对照试验。

Multimodal intervention for preventing peripheral intravenous catheter failure in adults (PREBACP): a multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled trial.

机构信息

Quality, Teaching and Research Unit, Hospital de Manacor, Manacor, Spain; Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain; Care, Chronicity and Evidence in Health Research Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain.

Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain; Care, Chronicity and Evidence in Health Research Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2021 Sep;8(9):e637-e647. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00206-4.

DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00206-4
PMID:34450101
Abstract

BACKGROUND

2 billion peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) are inserted into inpatients worldwide each year. Almost one in two PIVCs fail before completion of intravenous therapy. We aimed to determine the efficacy and costs of a multimodal intervention to reduce PIVC failure among hospitalised patients.

METHODS

PREBACP was a cluster-randomised, controlled trial done at seven public hospitals in Spain. Clusters (hospital wards) had at least 70% permanent staff and data were collected from patients aged 18 years and older with one or more PIVCs at the start of intravenous therapy. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1) to the multimodal intervention or control group using a centralised, web-based randomisation software, and stratified by type of setting. We concealed randomisation to allocation, without masking patients or professionals to the intervention. An intervention using a multimodal model and dissemination of protocols, education for health-care professionals and patients, and feedback on performance was implemented for 12 months in the intervention group. The control group received usual care. The primary outcome was all-cause PIVC failure at 12 months (phlebitis, extravasation, obstruction, or infections). Subsequently, through an amendment to the protocol approved on July 25, 2021, we included dislodgement as part of PIVC failure. Analysis was by modified intention to treat, which included all randomly assigned hospital wards for whom data on the primary endpoint were available. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN10438530.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 1, 2019, and March 1, 2020, we randomly assigned 22 eligible clusters to receive the multimodal intervention (n=11 clusters; 2196 patients, 2235 PIVCs, and 131 nurses) or usual practice in the control group (n=11 clusters; 2282 patients, 2330 PIVCs, and 138 nurses). At 12 months, the proportion of PIVC failures was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (37·10% [SD 1·32], HR 0·81 [95% CI 0·72 to 0·92] vs 46·49% [2·59], HR 1·23 [1·04 to 1·39]; mean difference -9·39% [95% CI -11·22 to -7·57]; p<0·0001). Per-protocol-prespecified analysis of the primary outcome excluding dislodgement also showed the intervention significantly reduced PIVC failure compared with the control group at 12 months (33·47% [SD 2·98], HR 0·85 [95% CI 0·75 to 0·96] vs 41·06% [4·62], HR 1·18 [1·04 to 1·33]; mean difference -7·59% [95% CI -11·05 to -4·13]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

A multimodal intervention reduced PIVC failure, thereby reducing potentially serious complications for hospitalised patients. The findings of PREBACP enabled a deeper understanding of decision making, knowledge mobilisation, and sense making in routine clinical practice.

FUNDING

The College of Nurses of the Balearic Islands.

TRANSLATION

For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

摘要

背景

全世界每年有 20 亿根外周静脉导管(PIVC)插入住院患者体内。几乎每两根 PIVC 中就有一根在静脉治疗完成前失效。我们旨在确定一种多模式干预措施的疗效和成本,以降低住院患者的 PIVC 失败率。

方法

PREBACP 是在西班牙 7 家公立医院进行的一项集群随机对照试验。集群(医院病房)至少有 70%的固定工作人员,从开始静脉治疗时就有一根或多根 PIVC 的 18 岁及以上的患者中收集数据。使用中央、基于网络的随机软件,将集群随机分配(1:1)到多模式干预组或对照组,并按设置类型进行分层。我们对分配进行了隐藏式随机化,而不向患者或专业人员隐瞒干预措施。在干预组中实施了为期 12 个月的多模式模型干预和方案传播、卫生保健专业人员和患者教育以及绩效反馈。对照组接受常规护理。主要结局是 12 个月时的所有原因 PIVC 失效(静脉炎、外渗、阻塞或感染)。随后,根据 2021 年 7 月 25 日批准的方案修正案,我们将脱落纳入 PIVC 失效的一部分。分析采用改良意向治疗,包括所有随机分配的医院病房,这些病房都有主要结局的数据。这项试验在 ISRCTN 注册处,ISRCTN10438530 处注册。

结果

在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 1 日期间,我们随机分配了 22 个符合条件的集群接受多模式干预(n=11 个集群;2196 名患者,2235 根 PIVC,131 名护士)或对照组的常规实践(n=11 个集群;2282 名患者,2330 根 PIVC,138 名护士)。在 12 个月时,干预组的 PIVC 失效比例低于对照组(37.10%[标准差 1.32],HR 0.81[95%CI 0.72 至 0.92]vs 46.49%[2.59],HR 1.23[1.04 至 1.39];平均差异-9.39%[95%CI -11.22 至 -7.57];p<0.0001)。排除脱落的预先规定的主要结局的按方案分析也表明,与对照组相比,干预组在 12 个月时显著降低了 PIVC 失效率(33.47%[标准差 2.98],HR 0.85[95%CI 0.75 至 0.96]vs 41.06%[4.62],HR 1.18[1.04 至 1.33];平均差异-7.59%[95%CI -11.05 至 -4.13];p<0.0001)。

解释

多模式干预降低了 PIVC 失效率,从而降低了住院患者潜在的严重并发症。PREBACP 的发现使我们能够更深入地了解决策制定、知识动员和常规临床实践中的意义建构。

资金

巴利阿里群岛护士学院。

相似文献

1
Multimodal intervention for preventing peripheral intravenous catheter failure in adults (PREBACP): a multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled trial.多模式干预预防成人外周静脉导管失败(PREBACP):一项多中心、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Haematol. 2021 Sep;8(9):e637-e647. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00206-4.
2
Integrated versus nOn-integrated Peripheral inTravenous catheter. Which Is the most effective systeM for peripheral intravenoUs catheter Management? (The OPTIMUM study): a randomised controlled trial protocol.集成式与非集成式外周静脉导管。哪种是外周静脉导管管理的最有效系统?(最佳研究):一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e019916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019916.
3
Dressings and securements for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter failure in adults (SAVE): a pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial.成人外周静脉导管失败预防用敷料和固定装置(SAVE):一项实用、随机对照、优效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Aug 4;392(10145):419-430. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31380-1. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Varied flushing frequency and volume to prevent peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial in adult medical-surgical hospital patients.采用不同的冲洗频率和量预防外周静脉导管失功:一项针对成年内科-外科住院患者的先导性析因随机对照试验
Trials. 2016 Jul 26;17(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1470-6.
5
Integrated versus nonintegrated peripheral intravenous catheter in hospitalized adults (OPTIMUM): A randomized controlled trial.住院成人中使用整合型与非整合型外周静脉导管(OPTIMUM):一项随机对照试验。
J Hosp Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):21-32. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12995. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
6
Implementation and evaluation of short peripheral intravenous catheter flushing guidelines: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.实施和评估外周短导管冲洗指南:一项阶梯式楔形群随机试验。
BMC Med. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01728-1.
7
Implementation of a knowledge mobilization model to prevent peripheral venous catheter-related adverse events: PREBACP study-a multicenter cluster-randomized trial protocol.实施一种知识转化模型以预防外周静脉导管相关不良事件:PREBACP 研究-一项多中心整群随机试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 25;13(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0792-z.
8
Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.常规与临床指征外周静脉导管更换:一项随机对照等效试验。
Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1066-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61082-4.
9
Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study.实施 I-DECIDED 外周静脉导管评估和安全移除临床决策工具:一项中断时间序列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 4;8(6):e021290. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021290.
10
What fuels suboptimal care of peripheral intravenous catheter-related infections in hospitals? A qualitative study of decision-making among Spanish nurses.是什么导致医院对外周静脉导管相关感染的护理不尽人意?西班牙护士决策的定性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Aug 19;11(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01144-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical-epidemiological predictors of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters in Spanish hospitals: results of a national cohort study.西班牙医院中与外周静脉导管相关静脉炎的临床流行病学预测因素:一项全国队列研究的结果
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 28;9:100355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100355. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
The effect of three different nonpharmacological methods on cannulation success during peripheral intravenous catheter placement in the emergency unit: a randomized controlled trial.三种不同非药物方法对急诊外周静脉置管中置管成功率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02723-2.
3
Vascular access specialist teams versus standard practice for catheter insertion and prevention of failure: a systematic review.
血管通路专家团队与导管插入和预防失败的标准实践:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 5;14(7):e082631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082631.
4
Strategies for knowledge mobilization by advanced practice nurses in three hospitals in Spain: a qualitative study.西班牙三家医院中高级执业护士的知识传播策略:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 26;23(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02095-5.
5
Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards surgical site infection and surveillance: A quasi-experimental study.医护人员对手术部位感染和监测的知识及态度:一项准实验研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2048. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2048.
6
Impact of advanced practice nurses in hospital units on compliance with clinical practice guidelines: a quasi-experimental study.高级实践护士在医院科室对临床实践指南依从性的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 29;21(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01110-x.
7
Integrated versus nonintegrated peripheral intravenous catheter in hospitalized adults (OPTIMUM): A randomized controlled trial.住院成人中使用整合型与非整合型外周静脉导管(OPTIMUM):一项随机对照试验。
J Hosp Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):21-32. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12995. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
8
What fuels suboptimal care of peripheral intravenous catheter-related infections in hospitals? A qualitative study of decision-making among Spanish nurses.是什么导致医院对外周静脉导管相关感染的护理不尽人意?西班牙护士决策的定性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Aug 19;11(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01144-5.
9
Evidence-Informed Development of a Bundle for Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Portugal: A Delphi Consensus Study.葡萄牙外周静脉置管集束方案的循证制定:一项德尔菲共识研究
Nurs Rep. 2022 Jul 7;12(3):498-509. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12030047.