• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫苗效力的性别差异:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Sex Disparities in Efficacy in COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Bignucolo Alessia, Scarabel Lucia, Mezzalira Silvia, Polesel Jerry, Cecchin Erika, Toffoli Giuseppe

机构信息

Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano, Italy.

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano, Italy.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;9(8):825. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080825.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines9080825
PMID:34451950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8402482/
Abstract

Sex differences in adaptive and innate immune responses have been shown to occur and anecdotal reports suggest that vaccine efficacy and safety may be sex-dependent. We investigated the influence of sex on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines. The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines was also investigated. A systematic review included eligible articles published in three databases and three websites. A meta-analysis of available data, stratified by sex, was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method, as well as influence and heterogeneity analysis. Pooled analysis showed significantly higher efficacy, measured as the rate of new COVID-19 cases, in men compared to women in the vaccine group (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94). No sex differences were found in the rate of new cases in the control group (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09). Safety profiles derived from pharmacovigilance reports appear to indicate increased toxicity in women. In conclusion, evidence of a potential role of sex in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy was described. It strengthens the need to include sex as a core variable in the clinical trial design of COVID-19 vaccines.

摘要

适应性和先天性免疫反应中的性别差异已被证实存在,轶事报道表明疫苗的效力和安全性可能取决于性别。我们通过对新冠疫苗临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,研究了性别对新冠疫苗效力的影响。同时也对新冠疫苗的安全性进行了调查。系统评价纳入了在三个数据库和三个网站上发表的符合条件的文章。对现有数据按性别进行分层荟萃分析。采用Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman方法进行统计分析,以及影响和异质性分析。汇总分析显示,在疫苗组中,以新冠新发病例率衡量,男性的效力显著高于女性(OR = 0.67,95% CI 0.48 - 0.94)。在对照组中,新发病例率未发现性别差异(OR = 0.92,95% CI 0.78 - 1.09)。药物警戒报告得出的安全性数据似乎表明女性的毒性增加。总之,描述了性别在新冠疫苗效力中潜在作用的证据。这强化了在新冠疫苗临床试验设计中将性别作为核心变量纳入的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d6/8402482/aed4dc61ecc4/vaccines-09-00825-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d6/8402482/8451ce43e91a/vaccines-09-00825-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d6/8402482/fdadac305ae3/vaccines-09-00825-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d6/8402482/aed4dc61ecc4/vaccines-09-00825-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d6/8402482/8451ce43e91a/vaccines-09-00825-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d6/8402482/fdadac305ae3/vaccines-09-00825-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d6/8402482/aed4dc61ecc4/vaccines-09-00825-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex Disparities in Efficacy in COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新冠疫苗效力的性别差异:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;9(8):825. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080825.
2
Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis.新冠病毒疫苗Ⅲ期试验的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 1;9(6):582. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060582.
3
Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗的疗效与安全性:随机临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 May 6;9(5):467. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9050467.
4
5
Chemoprophylaxis trial designs in epidemics: insights from a systematic review of COVID-19 study registrations.传染病化学预防试验设计:从 COVID-19 研究注册的系统评价中得到的启示。
Trials. 2021 May 29;22(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05323-4.
6
Different meta-analysis methods can change judgements about imprecision of effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study.不同的荟萃分析方法可能会改变对效应估计精度的判断:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Apr;28(2):126-132. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112053. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
7
8
Assessing sex-differences and the effect of timing of vaccination on immunogenicity, reactogenicity and efficacy of vaccines in young children: study protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.评估幼儿疫苗接种时间对疫苗免疫原性、反应原性和效力的性别差异及影响:一项随机对照试验个体参与者数据荟萃分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 29;6(7):e011680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011680.
9
Effect of an Inactivated Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 on Safety and Immunogenicity Outcomes: Interim Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.新型冠状病毒灭活疫苗在安全性和免疫原性方面的效果:两项随机临床试验的中期分析。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 8;324(10):951-960. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.15543.
10
Extended-interval aminoglycoside administration for children: a meta-analysis.儿童延长给药间隔氨基糖苷类药物治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):e111-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.e111.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review.根据性别和年龄对SARS-CoV-2 mRNA疫苗反应的差异:一项系统综述。
New Microbes New Infect. 2024 Dec 6;63:101551. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2024.101551. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Sex differences in response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in Italian population.意大利人群对 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗反应的性别差异。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Nov 18;152:e139. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824001079.
3
Sex differences in symptoms following the administration of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children below 5 years of age in Germany (CoVacU5): a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
US Case Reports of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis With Thrombocytopenia After Ad26.COV2.S Vaccination, March 2 to April 21, 2021.美国 2021 年 3 月 2 日至 4 月 21 日 Ad26.COV2.S 疫苗接种后出现脑静脉窦血栓形成伴血小板减少的病例报告。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2448-2456. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7517.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19.单剂 Ad26.COV2.S 疫苗预防新冠病毒的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2187-2201. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101544. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Real-World Evidence and the Regulation of Medicines.
德国(CoVacU5)5 岁以下儿童接种 BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗后症状的性别差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Biol Sex Differ. 2024 Sep 26;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13293-024-00651-x.
4
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against severe COVID-19 among patients with cancer in Catalonia, Spain.西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区癌症患者感染 COVID-19 疫苗对重症 COVID-19 的有效性。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 19;15(1):5088. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49285-y.
5
Sex and gender differences in adverse events following influenza and COVID-19 vaccination.流感和 COVID-19 疫苗接种后不良事件的性别差异。
Biol Sex Differ. 2024 Jun 18;15(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13293-024-00625-z.
6
Immune Cells, Gut Microbiota, and Vaccines: A Gender Perspective.免疫细胞、肠道微生物群和疫苗:性别视角。
Cells. 2024 Mar 17;13(6):526. doi: 10.3390/cells13060526.
7
mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 induce divergent antigen-specific T-cell responses in patients with lung cancer.mRNA 疫苗针对 SARS-CoV-2 可诱导肺癌患者产生不同的抗原特异性 T 细胞反应。
J Immunother Cancer. 2024 Jan 4;12(1):e007922. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007922.
8
A Comparative Study of Immunogenicity, Antibody Persistence, and Safety of Three Different COVID-19 Boosters between Individuals with Comorbidities and the Normal Population.合并症患者与正常人群中三种不同新冠病毒加强针的免疫原性、抗体持久性及安全性的比较研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;11(8):1376. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081376.
9
Influence of the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms rs12252 and rs34481144 in on the Antibody Response after Vaccination against COVID-19.rs12252和rs34481144单核苷酸多态性对COVID-19疫苗接种后抗体反应的影响。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;11(7):1257. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11071257.
10
Sex and Age: 2 Predictors of Cardiovascular Events With COVID-19 Infection.性别与年龄:新冠病毒感染引发心血管事件的两个预测因素。
JACC Adv. 2023 May;2(3):100325. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100325. Epub 2023 May 10.
真实世界证据与药品监管
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1169-1172. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2230.
4
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination.接种 ChAdOx1 nCov-19 疫苗后发生血栓性血小板减少症。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2092-2101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
5
Sex-disaggregated data in COVID-19 vaccine trials.新冠疫苗试验中的性别分类数据。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):966-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00384-6. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
6
Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia.基于 rAd26 和 rAd5 载体的异源初免-加强型 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性和有效性:俄罗斯一项随机对照 3 期临床试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):671-681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00234-8. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.mRNA-1273 新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
8
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.BNT162b2 mRNA 新冠病毒疫苗的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission.全球 COVID-19 荟萃分析显示,男性性别是死亡和 ICU 入院的风险因素。
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 9;11(1):6317. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6.
10
A review of vaccine effects on women in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.鉴于新冠疫情对疫苗在女性群体中的作用的综述。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;59(6):812-820. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 11.