University of Maryland, College Park.
University of Maryland, College Park; University of Illinois at Chicago.
Behav Ther. 2021 Sep;52(5):1198-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
College students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at risk for alcohol-related problems and disorders relative to their typically developing peers. Despite risk, the optimal therapeutic approach for reducing problem alcohol use in students with ADHD, and mechanisms of change underlying treatment effects in this population, are largely unknown. The current study evaluated putative mechanisms of change in a randomized controlled trial of two harm reduction interventions for college student drinkers with ADHD (N = 113; 49% male): brief motivational intervention plus supportive counseling (BMI + SC) versus brief motivational intervention plus behavioral activation (BMI + BA). Results showed that participants in the BMI + BA condition engaged in more goal-directed activation and less avoidant behavior over the course of treatment compared to those in the BMI + SC condition, in turn predicting reductions in alcohol-related negative consequences. Effects were more robust 1 month following intervention, and diminished by 3 months. Sensitivity analyses revealed a significant indirect effect of treatment condition on alcohol-related negative consequence via reductions in avoidance over treatment. Post hoc moderated mediations showed that BMI + BA engaged target mechanisms more robustly for students with more severe ADHD and depressive symptoms compared to BMI + SC. These findings support the application of BMI + BA intervention, particularly in targeting goal-directed activation and avoidance/rumination in at-risk student drinkers with ADHD.
患有注意力缺陷多动障碍 (ADHD) 的大学生相对于其同龄人,更容易出现与酒精相关的问题和障碍。尽管存在风险,但对于 ADHD 学生减少问题性饮酒的最佳治疗方法,以及该人群治疗效果的潜在变化机制,仍知之甚少。本研究在一项针对 ADHD 大学生饮酒者的两项减少伤害干预措施的随机对照试验中评估了潜在的变化机制(N = 113;49%为男性):简短动机干预加支持性咨询(BMI + SC)与简短动机干预加行为激活(BMI + BA)。结果表明,与 BMI + SC 组相比,BMI + BA 组的参与者在治疗过程中表现出更多的目标导向激活和更少的回避行为,从而预测酒精相关不良后果的减少。干预后 1 个月效果更为显著,3 个月后效果减弱。敏感性分析显示,通过治疗过程中回避行为的减少,治疗条件对酒精相关不良后果存在显著的间接影响。事后调节中介分析显示,与 BMI + SC 相比,BMI + BA 对 ADHD 症状和抑郁症状更严重的学生更有效地干预了目标机制。这些发现支持 BMI + BA 干预的应用,特别是在针对 ADHD 高危学生饮酒者的目标导向激活和回避/反刍方面。