Suppr超能文献

自动体外除颤器的可及性与院外心脏骤停患者的生存率:真实世界研究的系统评价。

Accessibility of automatic external defibrillators and survival rate of people with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review of real-world studies.

机构信息

West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; West China Research Centre for Rural Health Development, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Institute for Health Cities, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2021 Oct;167:200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.08.035. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between the accessibility of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) and the survival rate of patients who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews. We searched the Chinese and English literature databases from 2009 to 2019. Study selection and data collection were conducted by three reviewers. One-month survival rates of OHCA with different AEDs accessibility were estimated using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Overall 16 studies with 55,537 participants were included. The overall one-month survival rate for OHCA was 27.4%. The one-month survival rate was 35.2% for people receiving AEDs within 5 min, 36.6% between 5 min to 10 min, and 28.4% for longer than 10 min. By distance between the location of the AEDs and the location of the cardiac arrest, the one-month survival rate was 37.1% for those ≤100 m, 22.0% for 100 m-200 m, and 12.8% for >200 m, respectively. The one-month survival rate was 39.3% in schools, sports venues and airports compared with 23.5% in other sites. The number of AEDs allocation was positively correlated, while the time and distance were negatively correlated with the one-month survival rate adjusted for other factors, but they were all non-significant correlations.

CONCLUSION

The improvement of accessibility of AEDs may increase the survival rate of OHCA and the survival rate may be higher in playgrounds, airports, and schools equipped with AEDs. However, the strength of evidence was limited by the considerably heterogeneity of included studies. Verification of these findings in further studies is warranted.

摘要

目的

评估自动体外除颤器(AED)的可及性与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者生存率之间的关系。

方法

系统评价按照 Cochrane 系统评价手册进行。我们检索了 2009 年至 2019 年的中英文文献数据库。通过三位审稿人进行研究选择和数据收集。使用荟萃分析估计不同 AED 可及性的 OHCA 一个月生存率。

结果

共纳入 16 项研究,共 55537 名参与者。OHCA 的总体一个月生存率为 27.4%。接受 AED 治疗的患者在 5 分钟内一个月生存率为 35.2%,5-10 分钟为 36.6%,10 分钟以上为 28.4%。根据 AED 位置与心脏骤停位置之间的距离,一个月生存率为距离≤100m 的患者为 37.1%,距离 100-200m 的患者为 22.0%,距离>200m 的患者为 12.8%。在学校、体育场馆和机场的一个月生存率为 39.3%,而其他地点为 23.5%。AED 分配数量与一个月生存率呈正相关,而时间和距离与一个月生存率呈负相关,但调整其他因素后,相关性均无统计学意义。

结论

提高 AED 的可及性可能会提高 OHCA 的生存率,在配备 AED 的游乐场、机场和学校,生存率可能更高。然而,由于纳入研究的异质性较大,证据强度有限。需要在进一步的研究中验证这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验