Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):2778-2786. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
Tension pneumothorax (TPT) is a frequent life-threat following thoracic injury. Time-critical decompression of the pleural cavity improves survival. However, whilst paramedics utilise needle thoracostomy (NT) and/or finger thoracostomy (FT) in the prehospital setting, the superiority of one technique over the other remains unknown.
To determine and compare procedural success, complications and mortality between NT and FT for treatment of a suspected TPT when performed by paramedics.
We searched four databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, CINAHL and Embase) from their commencement until 25 August 2020. Studies were included if they analysed patients suffering from a suspected TPT who were treated in the prehospital setting with a NT or FT by paramedics (or local equivalent nonphysicians).
The search yielded 293 articles after duplicates were removed of which 19 were included for final analysis. Seventeen studies were retrospective (8 cohort; 7 case series; 2 case control) and two were prospective cohort studies. Only one study was comparative, and none were randomised controlled trials. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n=13) and the remaining in Australia (n=4), Switzerland (n=1) and Canada (n=1). Mortality ranged from 12.5% to 79% for NT and 64.7% to 92.9% for FT patients. A higher proportion of complications were reported among patients managed with NT (13.7%) compared to FT (4.8%). We extracted three common themes from the papers of what constituted as a successful pleural decompression; vital signs improvement, successful pleural cavity access and absence of TPT at hospital arrival.
Evidence surrounding prehospital pleural decompression of a TPT by paramedics is limited. Available literature suggests that both FT and NT are safe for pleural decompression, however both procedures have associated complications. Additional high-quality evidence and comparative studies investigating the outcomes of interest is necessary to determine if and which procedure is superior in the prehospital setting.
张力性气胸(tension pneumothorax,TPT)是胸部损伤后常见的危及生命的并发症。及时进行胸腔减压可提高生存率。然而,在院前环境中,护理人员使用针式胸腔穿刺术(needle thoracostomy,NT)和/或手指胸腔穿刺术(finger thoracostomy,FT),但哪种技术更优仍不清楚。
确定并比较在院前环境中,由护理人员进行的 NT 和 FT 治疗疑似 TPT 的操作成功率、并发症和死亡率。
我们检索了四个数据库(Ovid Medline、PubMed、CINAHL 和 Embase),从其开始到 2020 年 8 月 25 日。纳入的研究分析了在院前环境中由护理人员(或当地同等非医师)使用 NT 或 FT 治疗疑似 TPT 的患者。
去除重复项后,搜索得到 293 篇文章,其中 19 篇纳入最终分析。17 项研究为回顾性(8 项队列研究;7 项病例系列研究;2 项病例对照研究),2 项为前瞻性队列研究。仅有 1 项研究为比较性研究,无随机对照试验。大多数研究在美国进行(n=13),其余分别在澳大利亚(n=4)、瑞士(n=1)和加拿大(n=1)进行。NT 患者的死亡率为 12.5%至 79%,FT 患者的死亡率为 64.7%至 92.9%。与 FT 患者(4.8%)相比,接受 NT 治疗的患者报告的并发症比例更高(13.7%)。我们从论文中提取了三个常见主题,即胸腔减压成功的标准:生命体征改善、成功进入胸腔和到达医院时不存在 TPT。
院前护理人员治疗 TPT 的胸腔减压证据有限。现有文献表明,FT 和 NT 均可安全用于胸腔减压,但两种方法都有相关并发症。需要更多高质量的证据和比较研究来调查感兴趣的结果,以确定在院前环境中哪种方法更优。