Buck Laura T, Katz David C, Ackermann Rebecca Rogers, Hlusko Leslea J, Kanthaswamy Sree, Weaver Timothy D
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, UK; Department of Anthropology, University of California Davis, USA.
Department of Anthropology, University of California Davis, USA; University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Canada.
J Hum Evol. 2021 Oct;159:103049. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103049. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
Ancient DNA analyses have shown that interbreeding between hominin taxa occurred multiple times. Although admixture is often reflected in skeletal phenotype, the relationship between the two remains poorly understood, hampering interpretation of the hominin fossil record. Direct study of this relationship is often impossible due to the paucity of hominin fossils and difficulties retrieving ancient genetic material. Here, we use a sample of known ancestry hybrids between two closely related nonhuman primate taxa (Indian and Chinese Macaca mulatta) to investigate the effect of admixture on skeletal morphology. We focus on pelvic shape, which has potential fitness implications in hybrids, as mismatches between maternal pelvic and fetal cranial morphology are often fatal to mother and offspring. As the pelvis is also one of the skeletal regions that differs most between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, investigating the pelvic consequences of interbreeding could be informative regarding the viability of their hybrids. We find that the effect of admixture in M. mulatta is small and proportional to the relatively small morphological difference between the parent taxa. Sexual dimorphism appears to be the main determinant of pelvic shape in M. mulatta. The lack of difference in pelvic shape between Chinese and Indian M. mulatta is in contrast to that between Neanderthals and H. sapiens, despite a similar split time (in generations) between the hybridizing pairs. Greater phenotypic divergence between hominins may relate to adaptations to disparate environments but may also highlight how the unique degree of cultural buffering in hominins allowed for greater neutral divergence. In contrast to some previous work identifying extreme morphologies in first- and second-generation hybrids, here the relationship between pelvic shape and admixture is linear. This linearity may be because most sampled animals have a multigenerational admixture history or because of relatively high constraints on the pelvis compared with other skeletal regions.
古DNA分析表明,古人类类群之间的杂交曾多次发生。尽管基因混合常常反映在骨骼表型上,但二者之间的关系仍鲜为人知,这妨碍了对古人类化石记录的解读。由于古人类化石稀少且难以获取古代遗传物质,直接研究这种关系往往是不可能的。在此,我们使用两个亲缘关系密切的非人类灵长类类群(印度猕猴和中国猕猴)之间已知血统的杂交样本,来研究基因混合对骨骼形态的影响。我们聚焦于骨盆形状,这对杂交后代的健康状况可能有潜在影响,因为母体骨盆与胎儿颅骨形态不匹配往往会对母体和后代造成致命后果。由于骨盆也是现代人类和尼安德特人之间差异最大的骨骼区域之一,研究杂交的骨盆后果可能有助于了解他们杂交后代的生存能力。我们发现,猕猴的基因混合效应较小,且与亲本类群之间相对较小的形态差异成正比。性二态性似乎是猕猴骨盆形状的主要决定因素。中国猕猴和印度猕猴在骨盆形状上没有差异,这与尼安德特人和现代人类之间的差异形成对比,尽管杂交配对之间的分化时间(以世代计)相似。古人类之间更大的表型差异可能与对不同环境的适应有关,但也可能凸显了古人类独特程度的文化缓冲如何允许更大程度的中性分化。与之前一些确定第一代和第二代杂交后代极端形态的研究不同,在这里骨盆形状与基因混合之间的关系是线性的。这种线性可能是因为大多数采样动物有多代杂交历史,或者是因为与其他骨骼区域相比,骨盆受到的限制相对较高。