Suppr超能文献

转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者特征与治疗模式的健康保险理赔与电子健康记录(EHRs)比较:一项回顾性队列研究

Comparison Between Health Insurance Claims and Electronic Health Records (EHRs) for Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Choi Yookyung Christy, Zhang Dongmu, Tyczynski Jerzy E

机构信息

Global Epidemiology, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.

Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2021 Dec;8(4):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s40801-021-00269-0. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical landscape in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has rapidly evolved in recent years. Real-world data (RWD) can provide insights into current clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the patient characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with metastatic NSCLC using RWD sources.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims and electronic health records (EHRs). Adult patients treated for metastatic NSCLC during the period 2017 to September 2020 were followed from the earliest treatment date until a censoring event.

RESULTS

The claims cohort included 7917 patients with a mean age of 70 years and a mean follow-up period of 373 days. The EHR cohort included 7087 patients with a mean age of 67 years and a mean follow-up period of 362 days. The five most common first-line therapies (LoT1) were the same for both cohorts: carboplatin + paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, carboplatin + pemetrexed + pembrolizumab, cisplatin + pemetrexed, and nivolumab. Mean LoT1 durations were 146 and 147 days in the claims and EHR cohorts, respectively. For patients who received a second LoT (LoT2), the five most common LoT2 were also the same in both cohorts: durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, carboplatin + pembrolizumab + pemetrexed, and carboplatin + pemetrexed. Mean LoT2 durations were 157 and 158 days in the claims and EHR cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LoTs between the claims and EHR cohorts were comparable and showed similar treatment patterns. Traditional platinum-containing chemotherapy was most common in LoT1, whereas programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors became the most common choices in LoT2. Our findings suggest that RWD can reliably provide up-to-date insight into current treatment modalities and indicate that new clinical evidence is rapidly adopted in patients with NSCLC.

摘要

背景

近年来,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗的临床格局迅速演变。真实世界数据(RWD)能够为当前临床实践提供见解。

目的

本研究利用RWD来源,考察转移性NSCLC患者的特征及治疗模式。

方法

这是一项使用医疗保险理赔数据和电子健康记录(EHR)的回顾性队列研究。对2017年至2020年9月期间接受转移性NSCLC治疗的成年患者,从最早治疗日期开始随访,直至出现审查事件。

结果

理赔队列包括7917例患者,平均年龄70岁,平均随访期373天。EHR队列包括7087例患者,平均年龄67岁,平均随访期362天。两个队列中最常见的五种一线治疗方案(LoT1)相同:卡铂 + 紫杉醇、帕博利珠单抗、卡铂 + 培美曲塞 + 帕博利珠单抗、顺铂 + 培美曲塞、纳武利尤单抗。理赔队列和EHR队列中LoT1的平均持续时间分别为146天和147天。对于接受二线治疗(LoT2)的患者,两个队列中最常见的五种LoT2也相同:度伐利尤单抗、纳武利尤单抗、帕博利珠单抗、卡铂 + 帕博利珠单抗 + 培美曲塞、卡铂 + 培美曲塞。理赔队列和EHR队列中LoT2的平均持续时间分别为157天和158天。

结论

理赔队列和EHR队列之间的治疗方案具有可比性,且显示出相似的治疗模式。传统含铂化疗在LoT1中最为常见,而程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂在LoT2中成为最常见的选择。我们的研究结果表明,RWD能够可靠地提供有关当前治疗方式的最新见解,并表明新的临床证据在NSCLC患者中迅速得到应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1561/8605954/2457c4585f74/40801_2021_269_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验