Suppr超能文献

采用个体化左心室侧壁激活时间作为参考的希氏束夺获诊断新方法。

Novel approach to diagnosis of His bundle capture using individualized left ventricular lateral wall activation time as reference.

机构信息

First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Department of Cardiology, H. Klimontowicz Specialistic Hospital, Gorlice, Poland.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Nov;32(11):3010-3018. doi: 10.1111/jce.15233. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During nonselective His bundle (HB) pacing, it is clinically important to confirm His bundle capture versus right ventricular septal (RVS) capture. The present study aimed to validate the hypothesis that during HB capture, left ventricular lateral wall activation time, approximated by the V R-wave peak time (V RWPT), will not be longer than the corresponding activation time during native conduction.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with permanent HB pacing were recruited; cases with abnormal His-ventricle interval or left bundle branch block were excluded. Two corresponding intervals were compared: stimulus-V RWPT and native HB potential-V RWPT. The difference between these two intervals (delta V RWPT), which was diagnostic of lack of HB capture, was identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 723 electrocardiograms (ECGs) (219 with native rhythm, 172 with selective HB, 215 with nonselective HB, and 117 with RVS capture) were obtained from 219 patients. The native HB-V RWPT, nonselective-, and selective-HB paced V RWPT were nearly equal, while RVS V RWPT was 32.0 (±9.5) ms longer. The ROC curve analysis indicated delta V RWPT > 12 ms as diagnostic of lack of HB capture (specificity of 99.1% and sensitivity of 100%). A blinded observer correctly diagnosed 96.7% (321/332) of ECGs using this criterion.

CONCLUSIONS

We validated a novel criterion for HB capture that is based on the physiological left ventricular activation time as an individualized reference. HB capture can be diagnosed when paced V RWPT does not exceed the value obtained during native conduction by more than 12 ms, while longer paced V RWPT indicates RVS capture.

摘要

背景

在非选择性希氏束(HB)起搏时,确认希氏束夺获与右室间隔(RVS)夺获非常重要。本研究旨在验证以下假设,即在 HB 夺获时,左心室外侧壁激活时间(由 V 波峰时间(V RWPT)近似)不会长于固有传导时的相应激活时间。

方法

连续招募接受永久性 HB 起搏的患者;排除希氏束-心室间期异常或左束支传导阻滞的病例。比较了两个相应的间隔:刺激-V RWPT 和固有 HB 电位-V RWPT。使用接收者操作特性(ROC)曲线分析确定诊断 HB 夺获缺失的两个间隔之间的差异(V RWPT 差值)。

结果

从 219 例患者中获得了 723 份心电图(ECG)(219 份为固有节律,172 份为选择性 HB,215 份为非选择性 HB,117 份为 RVS 夺获)。固有 HB-V RWPT、非选择性 HB 起搏 V RWPT 和选择性 HB 起搏 V RWPT 几乎相等,而 RVS V RWPT 长 32.0(±9.5)ms。ROC 曲线分析表明,V RWPT 差值>12 ms 可诊断为 HB 夺获缺失(特异性为 99.1%,敏感性为 100%)。使用该标准,一位盲法观察者正确诊断了 96.7%(321/332)的 ECG。

结论

我们验证了一种新的 HB 夺获标准,该标准基于生理性左心室激活时间作为个体化参考。当起搏 V RWPT 不超过固有传导时获得的值超过 12 ms 时,可以诊断 HB 夺获,而较长的起搏 V RWPT 则表明 RVS 夺获。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验