• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生理学的左束支夺获的心电图标准。

Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture.

机构信息

First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jun;18(6):935-943. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.02.021
PMID:33677102
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, it is important to confirm that capture of the LBB, and not just capture of only adjacent left ventricular (LV) myocardium, has been achieved.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to establish electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for LBB capture. We hypothesized that because LBB pacing results in physiological depolarization of the LV, then the native QRS can serve as a reference for diagnosis of LBB capture in the same patient.

METHODS

Only patients with evidence of LBB capture (QRS morphology transition) were included. Several QRS characteristics were compared between the native rhythm and different types of LBB area capture.

RESULTS

A total of 357 ECGs (124 patients) were analyzed: 118 with native rhythm, 124 with nonselective LBB capture, 69 with selective LBB capture, and 46 with LV septal capture. Our hypotheses that during LBB capture the paced V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT; measured from QRS onset) equals the native V6 RWPT and that the paced V6 RWPT (measured from the stimulus) equals the LBB potential to V6 R-wave peak interval were positively validated. Criteria based on these rules had sensitivity and specificity of 88.2%-98.0% and 85.7%-95.4%, respectively. Moreover, 100% specific V6 RWPT cutoff for LBB capture diagnosis in patients with narrow QRS/right bundle branch block was determined to be 74 ms.

CONCLUSION

We showed equivalency of LV activation times on ECG during native and paced LBB conduction. Therefore, if V6 RWPT is longer during pacing, this finding is indicative of lack of LBB capture.

摘要

背景

在左束支(LBB)区域起搏时,重要的是要确认已实现 LBB 的捕获,而不仅仅是仅捕获相邻的左心室(LV)心肌。

目的

本研究旨在建立 LBB 捕获的心电图(ECG)标准。我们假设,由于 LBB 起搏导致 LV 的生理性去极化,因此可以将固有 QRS 用作同一患者中 LBB 捕获诊断的参考。

方法

仅包括具有 LBB 捕获(QRS 形态过渡)证据的患者。比较了固有节律与不同类型的 LBB 区域捕获之间的几种 QRS 特征。

结果

共分析了 357 份心电图(124 例患者):118 份固有节律,124 份非选择性 LBB 捕获,69 份选择性 LBB 捕获和 46 份 LV 间隔捕获。我们的假设是,在 LBB 捕获期间,起搏的 V6 R 波峰时间(RWPT;从 QRS 起始测量)等于固有 V6 RWPT,并且起搏的 V6 RWPT(从刺激测量)等于 LBB 电位至 V6 R 波峰间隔,得到了积极验证。基于这些规则的标准的敏感性和特异性分别为 88.2%-98.0%和 85.7%-95.4%。此外,在 QRS/右束支阻滞较窄的患者中,用于 LBB 捕获诊断的 100%特异性 V6 RWPT 截止值确定为 74 ms。

结论

我们证明了在固有和起搏的 LBB 传导过程中,LV 激活时间在心电图上具有等效性。因此,如果起搏时 V6 RWPT 较长,则表示缺乏 LBB 捕获。

相似文献

1
Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture.基于生理学的左束支夺获的心电图标准。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jun;18(6):935-943. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Combination of current and new electrocardiographic-based criteria: a novel score for the discrimination of left bundle branch capture.现行和新的基于心电图标准的联合:用于鉴别左束支传导阻滞的新评分。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1051-1059. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac276.
3
Novel approach to diagnosis of His bundle capture using individualized left ventricular lateral wall activation time as reference.采用个体化左心室侧壁激活时间作为参考的希氏束夺获诊断新方法。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Nov;32(11):3010-3018. doi: 10.1111/jce.15233. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
4
Tailored electrocardiographic-based criteria for different pacing locations within the left bundle branch.基于心电图的左束支内不同起搏部位的定制标准。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jan;21(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.09.015. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
Redefining QRS transition to confirm left bundle branch capture during left bundle branch area pacing.重新定义QRS波群移行以确认左束支区域起搏期间的左束支夺获。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 14;10:1217133. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217133. eCollection 2023.
6
The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture.V6-V1 间期:诊断左束支阻滞夺获的新指标
Europace. 2022 Jan 4;24(1):40-47. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab164.
7
Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing.评价区分左束支起搏与左心室间隔起搏的标准。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;7(9):1166-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
8
Achievement rate and learning curve of left bundle branch capture in left bundle branch area pacing procedure performed to demonstrate output-dependent QRS transition.在左束支区域起搏程序中实现左束支捕获的达成率和学习曲线,以证明输出依赖性 QRS 过渡。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):2183-2191. doi: 10.1111/jce.15627. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
9
An individualized criterion for left bundle branch capture in patients with a narrow QRS complex.一种用于诊断窄 QRS 波群患者左束支传导阻滞的个体化标准。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Mar;21(3):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
10
Relationship of paced left bundle branch pacing morphology with anatomic location and physiological outcomes.起搏左束支区域形态与解剖位置和生理结果的关系。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jun;18(6):946-953. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Left bundle branch area pacing for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in a patient with dextrocardia after ventricular septal defect closure.室间隔缺损修补术后右位心患者左束支区域起搏治疗起搏诱导性心肌病
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2025 May 13;11(8):722-726. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2025.05.008. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Evaluation of cardiac energetics in left bundle branch area pacing using noninvasive pressure-volume loops.使用无创压力-容积环评估左束支区域起搏时的心脏能量学
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Mar 20;6(6):789-798. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.015. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Kinetics and Disappearance of QRS Transition in Patients Undergoing Left Bundle Branch Pacing - A Novel Method for Classifying Microdislodgement.
左束支起搏患者QRS波移行的动力学与消失情况——一种用于分类微脱位的新方法
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1111/jce.16779.
4
Incidence and Predictors of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Paced Patients Undergoing Attempted Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing.接受左束支区域起搏尝试的起搏患者中起搏诱导性心肌病的发生率及预测因素
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Aug;36(8):1987-1995. doi: 10.1111/jce.16767. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
5
JCS/JHRS 2024 Guideline Focused Update on Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2024年心律失常管理指南重点更新》
J Arrhythm. 2025 Jun 16;41(3):e70033. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70033. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Evaluating electrical stability in left bundle branch area pacing for bradycardia patients at follow-up.随访时评估心动过缓患者左束支区域起搏的电稳定性。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Feb 21;6(5):576-587. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.011. eCollection 2025 May.
7
Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Implantation.左束支区域起搏导线植入的学习曲线
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2025 May 15;16(5):6284-6291. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2025.16055. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Understanding LOT-CRT: Current Insights, Limitations, and Our Center's Experience.了解局限期同步放化疗:当前见解、局限性及我们中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 27;14(9):3025. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093025.
9
ECG-based evaluation of ventricular synchrony in left bundle branch area pacing through characterization of the activation sequence.通过激活序列特征对左束支区域起搏时心室同步性进行基于心电图的评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 4;15(1):15584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98608-6.
10
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: left bundle branch area pacing versus leadless pacing.起搏诱导性心肌病的发生率:左束支区域起搏与无导线起搏
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02048-1.