• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新定义QRS波群移行以确认左束支区域起搏期间的左束支夺获。

Redefining QRS transition to confirm left bundle branch capture during left bundle branch area pacing.

作者信息

Briongos-Figuero Sem, Estévez Paniagua Álvaro, Sánchez Hernández Ana, Muñoz-Aguilera Roberto

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Infanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 14;10:1217133. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217133. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217133
PMID:37522077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

QRS transition criteria during dynamic manoeuvers are the gold-standard for non-invasive confirmation of left bundle branch (LBB) capture, but they are seen in <50% of LBB area pacing (LBBAP) procedures.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that transition from left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) to LBB pacing (LBBP), when observed during lead penetration into the deep interventricular septum (IVS) with interrupted pacemapping, can suggest LBB capture.

METHODS

QRS transition during lead screwing-in was defined as shortening of paced V6-R wave peak time (RWPT) by ≥10 ms from LVSP to non-selective LBBP (ns-LBBP) obtained during mid to deep septal lead progression at the same target area, between two consecutive pacing manoeuvres. ECG-based criteria were used to compared LVSP and ns-LBBP morphologies obtained by interrupted pacemapping.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with demonstrated transition from LVSP to ns-LBBP during dynamic manoeuvers were compared to 44 patients with the same transition during lead screwing-in. Average shortening in paced V6-RWPT was similar among study groups (17.3 ± 6.8 ms vs. 18.8 ± 4.9 ms for transition during dynamic manoeuvres and lead screwing-in, respectively;  = 0.719). Paced V6-RWPT and aVL-RWPT, V6-V1 interpeak interval and the recently described LBBP score, were also similar for ns-LBBP morphologies in both groups. LVSP morphologies showed longer V6-RWPT and aVL-RWPT, shorter V6-V1 interpeak interval and lower LBBP score punctuation, without differences among the two QRS transition groups. V6-RWPT < 75 ms or V6-V1 interpeak interval > 44 ms criterion was more frequently achieved in ns-LBBP morphologies obtained during lead screwing-in compared to those obtained during dynamic manoeuvres (70.5% vs. 50%, respectively  = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

During LBBAP procedure, QRS transition from LVSP to ns-LBBP can be observed as the lead penetrates deep into the IVS with interrupted pacemapping. Shortening of at least 10 ms in paced V6-RWPT may serve as marker of LBB capture.

摘要

背景

动态操作期间的QRS波群移行标准是无创确认左束支(LBB)夺获的金标准,但在<50%的LBB区域起搏(LBBAP)手术中可见。

目的

我们假设,当在将电极导线穿入室间隔深部(IVS)并进行间断起搏标测时观察到从左心室间隔起搏(LVSP)转变为LBB起搏(LBBP),则提示LBB夺获。

方法

在同一目标区域,在电极导线从室间隔中部向深部推进过程中,两次连续起搏操作之间,将电极导线旋入过程中的QRS波群移行定义为起搏V6 - R波峰时间(RWPT)从LVSP缩短至非选择性LBBP(ns - LBBP)≥10毫秒。基于心电图的标准用于比较通过间断起搏标测获得的LVSP和ns - LBBP形态。

结果

将60例在动态操作期间显示从LVSP转变为ns - LBBP的患者与44例在电极导线旋入过程中发生相同转变的患者进行比较。各研究组起搏V6 - RWPT的平均缩短情况相似(动态操作和电极导线旋入过程中转变时分别为17.3±6.8毫秒和18.8±4.9毫秒;P = 0.719)。两组中ns - LBBP形态的起搏V6 - RWPT和aVL - RWPT、V6 - V1峰间间期以及最近描述的LBBP评分也相似。LVSP形态显示V6 - RWPT和aVL - RWPT更长,V6 - V1峰间间期更短,LBBP评分更低,两个QRS波群移行组之间无差异。与动态操作期间获得的ns - LBBP形态相比,电极导线旋入过程中获得的ns - LBBP形态更频繁地达到V6 - RWPT < 75毫秒或V6 - V1峰间间期> 44毫秒的标准(分别为70.5%和50%,P = 0.036)。

结论

在LBBAP手术中,当电极导线通过间断起搏标测深入IVS时,可观察到QRS波群从LVSP转变为ns - LBBP。起搏V6 - RWPT至少缩短10毫秒可作为LBB夺获的标志。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae7f/10375013/1bb1c9da8294/fcvm-10-1217133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae7f/10375013/5e7d81d335b0/fcvm-10-1217133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae7f/10375013/842e13042a16/fcvm-10-1217133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae7f/10375013/1bb1c9da8294/fcvm-10-1217133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae7f/10375013/5e7d81d335b0/fcvm-10-1217133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae7f/10375013/842e13042a16/fcvm-10-1217133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae7f/10375013/1bb1c9da8294/fcvm-10-1217133-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Redefining QRS transition to confirm left bundle branch capture during left bundle branch area pacing.重新定义QRS波群移行以确认左束支区域起搏期间的左束支夺获。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 14;10:1217133. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217133. eCollection 2023.
2
Combination of current and new electrocardiographic-based criteria: a novel score for the discrimination of left bundle branch capture.现行和新的基于心电图标准的联合:用于鉴别左束支传导阻滞的新评分。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1051-1059. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac276.
3
Tailored electrocardiographic-based criteria for different pacing locations within the left bundle branch.基于心电图的左束支内不同起搏部位的定制标准。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jan;21(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.09.015. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Characteristics and proposed mechanisms of QRS morphology observed during the left bundle branch pacing procedure.左束支起搏过程中观察到的 QRS 形态特征及可能机制。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;44(12):1987-1994. doi: 10.1111/pace.14382. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
5
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients.比较起搏器患者左束支起搏与左心室间隔起搏时的心室同步性。
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 17;10(4):822. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040822.
6
Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing.评价区分左束支起搏与左心室间隔起搏的标准。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;7(9):1166-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture.基于生理学的左束支夺获的心电图标准。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jun;18(6):935-943. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Achievement rate and learning curve of left bundle branch capture in left bundle branch area pacing procedure performed to demonstrate output-dependent QRS transition.在左束支区域起搏程序中实现左束支捕获的达成率和学习曲线,以证明输出依赖性 QRS 过渡。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):2183-2191. doi: 10.1111/jce.15627. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
9
Criteria for differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: A systematic review.区分左束支起搏与左心室间隔起搏的标准:一项系统评价。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 30;9:1006966. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1006966. eCollection 2022.
10
Left bundle fascicular versus left bundle trunk pacing: A comparison of their electrical synchrony parameters.左束支分支起搏与左束支主干起搏:电同步参数比较
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2024 Sep-Oct;24(5):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating electrical stability in left bundle branch area pacing for bradycardia patients at follow-up.随访时评估心动过缓患者左束支区域起搏的电稳定性。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Feb 21;6(5):576-587. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.011. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Current Advance, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Conduction System Pacing.传导系统起搏的当前进展、挑战及未来展望
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 16;25(12):438. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512438. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).EHRA 临床共识声明:心脏起搏的心脏传导系统植入术,由亚太心律学会(APHRS)、加拿大心律学会(CHRS)和拉丁美洲心律学会(LAHRS)共同认可。
Europace. 2023 Apr 15;25(4):1208-1236. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad043.
2
Combination of current and new electrocardiographic-based criteria: a novel score for the discrimination of left bundle branch capture.现行和新的基于心电图标准的联合:用于鉴别左束支传导阻滞的新评分。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1051-1059. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac276.
3
Resynchronization effects and clinical outcomes during left bundle branch area pacing with and without conduction system capture.
左束支区域起搏时伴有和不伴有传导系统夺获的再同步化效果和临床结果。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Mar;46(3):287-295. doi: 10.1002/clc.23969. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
4
Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.随机试验:左束支起搏与双心室起搏治疗心脏再同步治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019.
5
Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS study.左束支区域起搏的临床结局:多中心欧洲 MELOS 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):4161-4173. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac445.
6
A Comparison of the Electrophysiological and Anatomic Characteristics of Pacing Different Branches of the Left Bundle Conduction System.左束支传导系统不同分支起搏的电生理与解剖学特征比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 5;8:781845. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.781845. eCollection 2021.
7
Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology.区分左束支起搏与左心室间隔部起搏:基于心内电生理学的算法。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;33(3):448-457. doi: 10.1111/jce.15350. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry.左束支区域起搏与右心室起搏的临床结局比较:来自 Geisinger-Rush 传导系统起搏注册研究的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
9
Left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT): Results from an international LBBAP collaborative study group.左束支优化心脏再同步治疗(LOT-CRT):来自国际 LBBAP 合作研究小组的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.057. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
10
The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture.V6-V1 间期:诊断左束支阻滞夺获的新指标
Europace. 2022 Jan 4;24(1):40-47. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab164.