• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情限制措施对宾夕法尼亚州受害者援助机构利用率的影响。

The Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on Victim Advocacy Agency Utilization Across Pennsylvania.

作者信息

Wright Elizabeth N, Miyamoto Sheridan, Richardson Cameron

机构信息

College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, 119-C Nursing Sciences Building, University Park, PA 16802 USA.

The Child Maltreatment Solutions Network, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA.

出版信息

J Fam Violence. 2022;37(6):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00307-z. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10896-021-00307-z
PMID:34456463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8380015/
Abstract

This brief report highlights the impact of the COVID-19 restrictions on the utilization of Victim Advocacy Agencies' (VAAs') services across Pennsylvania, using VAA utilization data from 2019-2020. VAA utilization data in this report were collected from 2019-2020 by the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape (PCAR). VAA utilization data were anchored to COVID-19 restriction timelines, defined by the Pennsylvania Office of the Governor. For each month, a percent change in VAA utilization (e.g., Jan 2020 utilization compared to Jan 2019 utilization) was calculated. A one-way ANOVA was run to assess whether the association between restriction phase and percent change in overall VAA utilization from 2019 to 2020 was statistically significant. A substantial decrease in VAA utilization was observed once lockdown restrictions were enacted, as well as a sustained decrease in utilization between 2019 and 2020. When restrictions were eased, an increase in service utilization was noted. This pattern of findings held for the three variables assessed: hotline utilization, new client, and medical accompaniments for FREs per month. The one-way ANOVA confirmed a statistically significant decrease in overall VAA utilization when comparing the most severe COVID-19 related restrictions to both pre-COVID and less severe restrictions. A variety of barriers (e.g., financial instability, loss of childcare, technology access, chronic physical proximity to abuser, hospital visitation restrictions, fears of contracting the virus) may result in decreased utilization of VAA services. Future research should investigate the relevance of potential causal mechanisms behind VAA utilization to help inform intervention approaches.

摘要

本简要报告利用2019 - 2020年受害者维权机构(VAA)的服务利用数据,突出了新冠疫情限制措施对宾夕法尼亚州各地VAA服务利用情况的影响。本报告中的VAA服务利用数据由宾夕法尼亚州反对强奸联盟(PCAR)于2019 - 2020年收集。VAA服务利用数据与宾夕法尼亚州州长办公室定义的新冠疫情限制时间表相关联。每月计算VAA服务利用情况的百分比变化(例如,2020年1月的利用情况与2019年1月的利用情况相比)。进行单因素方差分析以评估限制阶段与2019年至2020年VAA总体服务利用百分比变化之间的关联是否具有统计学意义。一旦实施封锁限制,就观察到VAA服务利用情况大幅下降,并且在2019年至2020年期间利用情况持续下降。当限制措施放宽时,服务利用情况有所增加。这一发现模式适用于评估的三个变量:热线服务利用、新客户以及每月针对强奸相关急诊的医疗陪同。单因素方差分析证实,将与新冠疫情相关的最严格限制与疫情前及不太严格的限制进行比较时,VAA总体服务利用情况有统计学意义的下降。各种障碍(例如,经济不稳定、儿童保育缺失、技术获取困难、与施虐者长期身体接近、医院探视限制、对感染病毒的恐惧)可能导致VAA服务利用情况下降。未来的研究应调查VAA服务利用背后潜在因果机制的相关性,以帮助为干预方法提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bdf/8380015/947a7afadff1/10896_2021_307_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bdf/8380015/ec6377cad087/10896_2021_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bdf/8380015/9fae57e01e60/10896_2021_307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bdf/8380015/947a7afadff1/10896_2021_307_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bdf/8380015/ec6377cad087/10896_2021_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bdf/8380015/9fae57e01e60/10896_2021_307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bdf/8380015/947a7afadff1/10896_2021_307_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on Victim Advocacy Agency Utilization Across Pennsylvania.新冠疫情限制措施对宾夕法尼亚州受害者援助机构利用率的影响。
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(6):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00307-z. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
2
The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on sexual assault in Western Denmark.新冠疫情限制措施对丹麦西部性侵案件的影响。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Mar;20(1):166-173. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00682-7. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
The Endemic Amid the Pandemic: Seeking Help for Violence Against Women in the Initial Phases of COVID-19.大流行期间的地方性问题:在 COVID-19 初期寻求针对妇女暴力问题的帮助。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):4899-4915. doi: 10.1177/0886260521997946. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Visitor Restrictions During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Increased Falls With Harm at a Canadian Hospital: An Exploratory Study.COVID-19 大流行期间的访客限制与加拿大一家医院伤害性跌倒增加:一项探索性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Sep 1;20(6):434-439. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001237. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
6
7
Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 restrictions on HIV testing services in Malawi: an interrupted time series analysis.评估 COVID-19 限制措施对马拉维 HIV 检测服务的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Afr J AIDS Res. 2023 Jul;22(2):92-101. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2023.2197883. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
8
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.伦敦急诊部脆弱青年暴力干预方案:快速评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492.
9
Sexual assault survivors' engagement with advocacy services during the COVID-19 pandemic.性侵犯幸存者在 COVID-19 大流行期间与倡导服务的接触。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Aug;50(6):2644-2658. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22819. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
10
Exploring the effects of COVID-19 on family planning: results from a qualitative study in rural Uganda following COVID-19 lockdown.探讨 COVID-19 对计划生育的影响:COVID-19 封锁后在乌干达农村进行的定性研究结果。
Reprod Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01566-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring access to health and social supports for intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors during stressful life events (SLEs)-A scoping review.探索亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)幸存者在压力性生活事件(SLEs)期间获得健康和社会支持的情况——一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0313613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313613. eCollection 2024.
2
Unveiling the Narratives of Portuguese Professionals Engaged with Domestic Violence Victims: Persistent Challenges and Novel COVID-19 Impacts.揭示与家庭暴力受害者打交道的葡萄牙专业人员的故事:持续存在的挑战和新冠疫情的新影响
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Apr;40(7-8):1643-1667. doi: 10.1177/08862605241262243. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
An increasing risk of family violence during the Covid-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives.新冠疫情期间家庭暴力风险上升:加强社区合作以拯救生命。
Forensic Sci Int Rep. 2020 Dec;2:100089. doi: 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
2
COVID-19, Lockdown, and Intimate Partner Violence: Some Data from an Italian Service and Suggestions for Future Approaches.COVID-19、封锁和亲密伴侣暴力:意大利服务的一些数据和对未来方法的建议。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Oct;29(10):1239-1242. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8590. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
3
Exacerbation of Physical Intimate Partner Violence during COVID-19 Pandemic.
"Having One Person Tell Me I Didn't Do the Wrong Thing": The Impact of Support on the Post-Sexual Assault Exam Experience.
“有一个人告诉我我没有做错事”:支持对性侵犯后检查经历的影响。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Aug;30(10):2721-2742. doi: 10.1177/10778012231156153. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
How did UK social distancing restrictions affect the lives of women experiencing intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative exploration of survivor views.英国的社交距离限制如何影响 COVID-19 大流行期间遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的生活?对幸存者观点的定性探讨。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-14987-3.
5
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Family Violence: Reflecting on Two Years' Research.新冠疫情与家庭暴力:对两年研究的反思
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(5):719-724. doi: 10.1007/s10896-022-00410-9. Epub 2022 May 10.
6
Crisis Work Embedded in a Global Crisis: The Early Phase Impact of COVID-19 on Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence and Service Provisions.危机工作嵌入全球危机之中:COVID-19 对亲密伴侣暴力幸存者及其服务提供的早期阶段影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084728.
新冠疫情期间身体亲密伴侣暴力的加剧。
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):E38-E45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202866. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
4
Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond.COVID-19 期间及之后的产科远程医疗实施。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Sep;24(9):1104-1110. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02967-7.
5
Staying safe during COVID-19: How a pandemic can escalate risk for intimate partner violence and what can be done to provide individuals with resources and support.在 COVID-19 期间保持安全:大流行如何加剧亲密伴侣暴力的风险,以及可以采取哪些措施为个人提供资源和支持。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S202-S204. doi: 10.1037/tra0000688. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020.COVID-19 大流行对急诊就诊的影响-美国,2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 30 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 12;69(23):699-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1.
7
A Systematic Review of Intimate Partner Violence Interventions: State of the Field and Implications for Practitioners.亲密伴侣暴力干预措施的系统评价:现状及对从业者的影响。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Apr;21(2):311-325. doi: 10.1177/1524838018767934. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: a review of the literature.亲密伴侣暴力向非正式社会支持网络成员的披露:文献综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014 Jan;15(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/1524838013496335. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
Counseling services for battered women: a comparison of outcomes for physical and sexual assault survivors.
J Interpers Violence. 2003 Jul;18(7):717-34. doi: 10.1177/0886260503253230.