Volkmann H, Küch N, Lukoseviciute A J, Giedrimiene D A, Paliege R, Kühnert H
Klinik für Innere Medizin, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1987 Dec 15;42(24):702-7.
By means of highly frequent transoesophageal (left-atrial) atrial stimulation 69 patients with atrial flutter of type I (negative flutter waves in the leads II, III and aVF) and 35 patients with atrial flutter type II (positive flutter waves in the corresponding leads from the extremities) were treated and the results were compared with the results of right-atrial highly frequent stimulation (15 patients with type I atrial flutter, 6 patients with type II atrial flutter). In these cases the atrial flutter of type I nearly without any exception could be influenced by transoesophageal as well as by right-atrial stimulation (transfer into sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter of type II). The rate of success of the right-atrial as well as of the transoesophageal (left-atrial) stimulation was clearly lower in the atrial flutter of type II than in the atrial flutter of type I, in which cases are to be discussed as causes the slightly higher frequency of atrial flutter in type II, a smaller reentry circle, a higher rate of mechanisms of focal tachycardia and - in one part of the patients - an origin of tachycardia in the left atrium.
通过高频经食管(左心房)心房刺激,对69例I型心房扑动(II、III和aVF导联中扑动波为负)患者和35例II型心房扑动(肢体导联中相应导联扑动波为正)患者进行了治疗,并将结果与右心房高频刺激(15例I型心房扑动患者,6例II型心房扑动患者)的结果进行了比较。在这些病例中,几乎无一例外,I型心房扑动可受经食管以及右心房刺激的影响(转变为窦性心律、心房颤动或II型心房扑动)。II型心房扑动时,右心房及经食管(左心房)刺激的成功率明显低于I型心房扑动,对于这些病例,应讨论II型心房扑动频率略高、折返环较小、局灶性心动过速机制发生率较高以及部分患者心动过速起源于左心房等原因。