Serra Francesco, Faverio Carlotta, Lasagna Angioletta, Barruscotti Stefania, Dominioni Tommaso, Benazzo Marco, Pedrazzoli Paolo, Chiellino Silvia
Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Drugs Context. 2021 Aug 9;10. doi: 10.7573/dic.2021-3-1. eCollection 2021.
The clinical management of -mutated metastatic melanoma had an important turning point after the introduction of the targeted therapy. Despite the efficacy and good tolerability of this treatment, the development of resistance mechanisms causes disease progression. The aim of this review is to investigate the role of treatment beyond progression and locoregional approaches in -mutated metastatic melanoma and provide oncologists dealing with this malignancy a useful road map on when and why to choose this strategy. The article is structured in the form of a narrative review reporting the most significant studies on the subject. Most of the available articles are represented by retrospective studies and case reports, leading to limitations in the final interpretations. Nevertheless, a correct analysis of the selected studies allows the drawing of some conclusions. In well-selected cases, treatment beyond progression could play an important role in the treatment sequence of patients with -mutated advanced melanoma and would seem to produce good disease control rates and positive survival outcomes. A careful evaluation of the radiological examinations and laboratory tests, based on the clinical conditions, allows the identification of which patients can benefit from this strategy. Such patients are those who, at the time of progression, have favourable features such as a lower performance status according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG-PS), normal lactate dehydrogenase levels and lower disease burden. The clinical benefit is also consolidated by the addition of locoregional approaches. Locoregional approaches can include electrochemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery, and their use provides local disease control and a better quality of life for patients.
在引入靶向治疗后,BRAF突变转移性黑色素瘤的临床管理出现了一个重要转折点。尽管这种治疗具有疗效且耐受性良好,但耐药机制的出现会导致疾病进展。本综述的目的是探讨疾病进展后治疗及局部区域治疗方法在BRAF突变转移性黑色素瘤中的作用,并为治疗这种恶性肿瘤的肿瘤学家提供一份关于何时以及为何选择该策略的实用路线图。本文采用叙述性综述的形式构建,报告了该主题最重要的研究。现有文章大多为回顾性研究和病例报告,这导致最终解读存在局限性。然而,对所选研究进行正确分析后可以得出一些结论。在精心挑选的病例中,疾病进展后治疗在BRAF突变晚期黑色素瘤患者的治疗序列中可能发挥重要作用,似乎能产生良好的疾病控制率和积极的生存结果。根据临床情况仔细评估影像学检查和实验室检查,有助于确定哪些患者能从该策略中获益。这类患者是那些在疾病进展时具有有利特征的人,如根据东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG-PS)标准表现状态较低、乳酸脱氢酶水平正常且疾病负担较轻。局部区域治疗方法的加入也巩固了临床获益。局部区域治疗方法可包括电化学疗法、放射疗法或手术,其应用可为患者提供局部疾病控制并改善生活质量。