Pavlacic Jeffrey M, Kellum Karen Kate, Schulenberg Stefan E
Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, 205 Peabody Hall, MS 38677 University, USA.
Clinical-Disaster Research Center, University of Mississippi, 203 Kinard Hall, MS 38677 University, USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Aug 25;15(4):1237-1246. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00632-1. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Broadly defined, restorative justice (RJ) is a set of procedures based in Indigenous peacemaking practices that reduces recidivism and guides the effective reparation of harm. RJ practices provide harm-affected parties an opportunity for engagement in the resolution process, which theoretically enhances community well-being. RJ practices overlap significantly with behavior-analytic principles. Implementing RJ practices from a context-focused, appetitive-based approach that focuses on classes of behaviors may address harmful behaviors within police organizations. RJ practices may also facilitate changes in contexts that support behaviors valued by the community. The current review discusses criminal and restorative justice, RJ processes and practices, the effectiveness of RJ in various contexts, how RJ overlaps with behavior-analytic principles and existing behavior science models in general, research suggestions, and recommendations for behavior analysts implementing RJ within police organizations and communities to address officer misconduct.
广义而言，恢复性司法（RJ）是一套基于本土调解做法的程序，可减少累犯并指导对伤害的有效修复。恢复性司法做法为受伤害方提供了参与解决过程的机会，从理论上讲，这可增进社区福祉。恢复性司法做法与行为分析原则有很大重叠。从以情境为重点、基于正向激励的方法（该方法关注行为类别）来实施恢复性司法做法，可能会解决警察组织内的有害行为。恢复性司法做法还可能促进支持社区所重视行为的情境发生变化。本综述讨论了刑事司法与恢复性司法、恢复性司法的过程与做法、恢复性司法在各种情境下的有效性、恢复性司法与行为分析原则以及一般现有行为科学模型的重叠情况、研究建议，以及对在警察组织和社区内实施恢复性司法以解决警察不当行为的行为分析师的建议。
