Suppr超能文献

学校中恢复性司法和恢复性实践的运用:系统文献综述。

Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):96. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010096.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the use of restorative justice (RJ) and restorative practices (RP) in schools has grown rapidly. Understanding how theory and research address this topic is important for its practical implementation based on scientific knowledge. The aim of this article was to analyse the practices derived from RJ implemented in school and what kinds of results have been achieved. Starting from the analysis of the qualitative and quantitative research in the field, a systematic review was conducted on the last decade of studies using RJ and RP at every level of school education.

METHODS

For this review, methods including the PRISMA guidelines, the PRISMA flow diagram, and qualitative synthesis were carried out. Scientific articles for the literature review were selected according to the following criteria: (1) publication date between the years 2010-2021; (2) student population aged 6-18 years; (3) publications in the English language; (4) articles directly accessible or accessible by contacting the author(s); 34 articles met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The most used RP in school are circles ( = 26), followed by restorative conferences ( = 17), peer mediation ( = 10), restorative conversations ( = 8), mediation ( = 7), community-building circles ( = 5). RP can improve the school climate, discipline, positive conflict management through actions that aim at preventing suspensions, exclusions, conflicts, and misbehaviours (e.g., bullying). RJ practices promote positive relationships between peers and between students and teachers, as well as to prosocial behaviours through the development of social and emotional skills.

CONCLUSIONS

From the studies examined, a great interest in applying restorative justice and practices in schools clearly emerged. Discussions on the benefits and challenges of implementation were provided. However, there is still limited evidence in terms of direct correlation, which suggests further studies on the impact of RJ and RP in school settings.

摘要

背景

近年来,恢复性司法(RJ)和恢复性实践(RP)在学校中的应用迅速增加。了解理论和研究如何解决这个问题对于基于科学知识的实际实施非常重要。本文的目的是分析在学校中实施的 RJ 实践以及取得了哪些成果。从对该领域的定性和定量研究的分析出发,对过去十年中在各级学校教育中使用 RJ 和 RP 的研究进行了系统回顾。

方法

为了进行这项综述,采用了 PRISMA 指南、PRISMA 流程图和定性综合等方法。根据以下标准选择文献综述的科学文章:(1)出版日期在 2010-2021 年之间;(2)学生年龄在 6-18 岁之间;(3)以英语出版;(4)可直接获取或通过联系作者获取的出版物;共有 34 篇文章符合纳入标准。

结果

学校中最常用的 RP 是圈子(=26),其次是恢复性会议(=17)、同龄人调解(=10)、恢复性对话(=8)、调解(=7)、社区建设圈子(=5)。RP 可以通过旨在防止停课、开除、冲突和不当行为(例如欺凌)的行动来改善学校氛围、纪律、积极的冲突管理。RJ 实践通过培养社交和情感技能,促进同伴之间以及学生与教师之间的积极关系以及亲社会行为。

结论

从审查的研究中,显然可以看出人们对在学校应用恢复性司法和实践的浓厚兴趣。讨论了实施的好处和挑战。然而,就直接相关性而言,证据仍然有限,这表明需要进一步研究 RJ 和 RP 在学校环境中的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70ff/8751228/3c0eb9cd84b2/ijerph-19-00096-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验