• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementing a New Score Scale for the Clinical Science Subject Examinations: Validity and Practical Considerations.为临床科学学科考试实施新的评分量表:效度及实际考量
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jun 10;29(3):841-847. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00747-9. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Predictors of medical school clerkship performance: a multispecialty longitudinal analysis of standardized examination scores and clinical assessments.医学院临床实习表现的预测因素:标准化考试成绩与临床评估的多专业纵向分析
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 27;16:128. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0652-y.
3
Are Scores From NBME Subject Examinations Valid Measures of Knowledge Acquired During Clinical Clerkships?美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)学科考试的分数是临床实习期间所学知识的有效衡量标准吗?
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):847-852. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001535.
4
Comparability of the national board of medical examiners comprehensive clinical science examination and a set of five clinical science subject examinations.美国国家医学考试委员会综合临床科学考试与一组五门临床科学科目考试的可比性。
Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):684-90. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000643.
5
Does the National Board of Medical Examiners' Surgery Subtest level the playing field?美国国家医学考试委员会的外科分测验是否营造了公平竞争的环境?
Am J Surg. 2004 Nov;188(5):520-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.07.036.
6
Impact of the Introduction of the Clinical Science Mastery Series on Family Medicine NBME Subject Examination Performance.临床科学精通系列的引入对家庭医学美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)科目考试成绩的影响。
Fam Med. 2019 Sep;51(8):687-690. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.253577.
7
Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.探讨实习后 USMLE 步骤 1 成绩的预测因素。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):330-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1721293. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Mobile spaced education for surgery rotation improves National Board of Medical Examiners scores.外科轮转的移动空间教育提高了美国医学考试委员会的分数。
J Surg Res. 2016 Mar;201(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
9
Faculty and resident evaluations of medical students on a surgery clerkship correlate poorly with standardized exam scores.外科学实习中教师和住院医师对医学生的评估与标准化考试成绩相关性较差。
Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
10
Performances on the NBME I, II, and III by medical students in the problem-based learning and conventional tracks at the University of New Mexico.新墨西哥大学基于问题学习和传统教学模式下医学生在国家医学考试委员会第一、二、三次考试中的表现。
Acad Med. 1993 Aug;68(8):616-24. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199308000-00012.

引用本文的文献

1
Score Gains on the NBME Subject Examinations in Internal Medicine Among Clerkship Students: a Two-Year Longitudinal Study from the United Arab Emirates.阿联酋实习医学生内科全国医师委员会(NBME)科目考试成绩提升情况:一项为期两年的纵向研究
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Jun 27;32(4):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01582-1. eCollection 2022 Aug.

为临床科学学科考试实施新的评分量表:效度及实际考量

Implementing a New Score Scale for the Clinical Science Subject Examinations: Validity and Practical Considerations.

作者信息

Morrison Carol, Ross Linette, Baker Gregory, Maranki Marie

机构信息

National Board of Medical Examiners, 3750 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jun 10;29(3):841-847. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00747-9. eCollection 2019 Sep.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-019-00747-9
PMID:34457549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8368544/
Abstract

Prior to August 2015, the National Board of Medical Examiners' (NBME) clinical science subject examination scores were reported as a scaled score. However, the scaled scores had some undesirable properties that threatened the validity of the inferences that score users were making based on the scores. The NBME changed the score scale to equated percent correct scores to address score validity concerns and to better meet the needs of medical school faculty and students. This paper describes the validity and practical considerations associated with the implementation of equated percent correct scores for the clinical science subject examination program.

摘要

2015年8月之前,美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)的临床科学科目考试成绩以标准分形式报告。然而,标准分存在一些不理想的特性,这对分数使用者基于这些分数所做推断的有效性构成了威胁。为了解决分数有效性问题并更好地满足医学院教师和学生的需求,NBME将分数量表改为等值正确百分比分数。本文描述了与临床科学科目考试项目实施等值正确百分比分数相关的有效性和实际考量。