• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定委托流程:美国医学院协会核心专业能力评估试点项目的见解

Developing an Entrustment Process: Insights from the AAMC CoreEPA Pilot.

作者信息

Moeller Jeremy J, Warren Jamie B, Crowe Ruth M, Wagner Dianne P, Cutrer William B, Hyderi Abbas A, Lupi Carla S, Obeso Vivian T, Yingling Sandra, Andriole Dorothy A, Brown David R

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA.

Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2020 Jan 28;30(1):395-401. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00918-z. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-020-00918-z
PMID:34457683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8368864/
Abstract

One of the main goals of the CoreEPA pilot has been to determine the feasibility of developing a process to make summative entrustment decisions regarding entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Five years into the pilot, we report results of a research study we conducted to explore approaches to the entrustment process undertaken by our ten participating schools. We sought to identify the choices that participating schools made regarding the entrustment process and why these decisions were made. We are sharing these results, highlighting ongoing challenges that were identified with the intent of helping other medical schools that are moving toward EPA-based assessment. We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives of all 10 medical schools in the CoreEPA pilot to understand their choices in designing the entrustment process. Additional information was obtained through follow-up communication to ensure completeness and accuracy of the findings. Several common themes are described. Our results indicate that, while approaches to the entrustment process vary considerably, all schools demonstrated consistent adherence to the guiding principles of the pilot. Several common barriers to the entrustment process emerged, and there was a consensus that more experience is needed with the process before consequential entrustment decisions can be made. The CoreEPA pilot schools continue to address challenges identified in implementing entrustment processes and making entrustment decisions for our students graduating in the Class of 2020.

摘要

核心可托付专业活动评估试点项目(CoreEPA)的主要目标之一,是确定开发一种流程的可行性,以便就可托付专业活动(EPA)做出总结性托付决策。在该试点项目开展五年之际,我们报告一项研究的结果,该研究旨在探索我们十所参与院校所采用的托付流程方法。我们试图确定参与院校在托付流程方面做出的选择以及做出这些决策的原因。我们正在分享这些结果,强调已发现的持续挑战,目的是帮助其他正朝着基于EPA的评估迈进的医学院校。我们对CoreEPA试点项目中所有10所医学院校的代表进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们在设计托付流程时的选择。通过后续沟通获取了更多信息,以确保研究结果的完整性和准确性。文中描述了几个共同主题。我们的结果表明,虽然托付流程的方法差异很大,但所有院校都始终如一地遵循了试点项目的指导原则。托付流程出现了几个常见障碍,并且大家一致认为,在做出重要的托付决策之前,需要对该流程有更多经验。CoreEPA试点院校继续应对在为2020届毕业学生实施托付流程和做出托付决策方面所发现的挑战。

相似文献

1
Developing an Entrustment Process: Insights from the AAMC CoreEPA Pilot.制定委托流程:美国医学院协会核心专业能力评估试点项目的见解
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Jan 28;30(1):395-401. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00918-z. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Finding a Path to Entrustment in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Progress Report From the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Entrustment Concept Group.探寻本科医学教育中的托付之道:美国医学协会(AAMC)住院医师入职核心可托付专业活动托付概念小组的进展报告
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):774-779. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001544.
3
Entrustment Decision Making in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities: Results of a Multi-Institutional Study.核心可委托专业活动中的委托决策:一项多机构研究的结果。
Acad Med. 2022 Apr 1;97(4):536-543. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004242.
4
Comparing Entrustment Decision-Making Outcomes of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities Pilot, 2019-2020.比较 2019-2020 年核心可委托专业活动试点的委托决策结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233342. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33342.
5
Decision-Making Confidence of Clinical Competency Committees for Entrustable Professional Activities.临床能力委员会对可委托专业活动的决策信心。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jul 1;159(7):801-808. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0809.
6
Implementing an Entrustable Professional Activities Framework in Undergraduate Medical Education: Early Lessons From the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Pilot.在本科医学教育中实施可托付专业活动框架:美国医学协会医学院入学核心可托付专业活动试点项目的早期经验教训
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):765-770. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001543.
7
Variable or Fixed? Exploring Entrustment Decision Making in Workplace- and Simulation-Based Assessments.变量还是固定?探索工作场所和模拟评估中的委托决策。
Acad Med. 2022 Jul 1;97(7):1057-1064. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004661. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
8
Bridging the gap: a five stage approach for developing specialty-specific entrustable professional activities.弥合差距:制定特定专业可托付专业活动的五阶段方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 20;16:117. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0637-x.
9
Development of an Assessment for Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) 10: Emergent Patient Management.制定可委托专业活动评估(EPA)10:紧急患者管理。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):35-42. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31479. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
10
I Trust or I Trust? The Gap between Entrustment Determinations and Entrustment Decisions for Trainees in Pharmacy and Other Health Professions.我信任还是我信任?药学及其他卫生专业实习生委托认定与委托决策之间的差距。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jun 18;11(3):107. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030107.

引用本文的文献

1
National pilot of entrustable professional activities in pathology residency training.病理学住院医师培训中可委托专业活动的全国试点项目
Acad Pathol. 2024 Mar 21;11(2):100110. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2024.100110. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
2
Comparing Entrustment Decision-Making Outcomes of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities Pilot, 2019-2020.比较 2019-2020 年核心可委托专业活动试点的委托决策结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233342. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33342.
3
Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) and the Transition from Medical School to Residency: the Postgraduate Year One Resident Perspective.核心可托付专业活动(EPA)以及从医学院到住院医师培训的过渡:第一年住院医师的视角
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Sep 10;31(6):1813-1822. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01370-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The EPA-based Utrecht undergraduate clinical curriculum: Development and implementation.基于 EPA 的乌得勒支本科临床课程:开发与实施。
Med Teach. 2018 May;40(5):506-513. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1435856. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
2
Education in Pediatrics Across the Continuum (EPAC): First Steps Toward Realizing the Dream of Competency-Based Education.儿科连续教育(EPAC):实现基于能力教育梦想的第一步。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):414-420. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002020.
3
Finding a Path to Entrustment in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Progress Report From the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Entrustment Concept Group.探寻本科医学教育中的托付之道:美国医学协会(AAMC)住院医师入职核心可托付专业活动托付概念小组的进展报告
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):774-779. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001544.
4
Implementing an Entrustable Professional Activities Framework in Undergraduate Medical Education: Early Lessons From the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Pilot.在本科医学教育中实施可托付专业活动框架:美国医学协会医学院入学核心可托付专业活动试点项目的早期经验教训
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):765-770. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001543.
5
Justice and care: decision making by medical school student promotions committees.公正与关怀:医学院学生晋升委员会的决策
Med Educ. 2017 Jun;51(6):621-632. doi: 10.1111/medu.13280.
6
Toward Defining the Foundation of the MD Degree: Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency.迈向医学博士学位基础的界定:进入住院医师培训阶段的核心可托付专业活动。
Acad Med. 2016 Oct;91(10):1352-1358. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001204.
7
Reviewing residents' competence: a qualitative study of the role of clinical competency committees in performance assessment.评估住院医师的能力:关于临床能力委员会在绩效评估中作用的定性研究
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1084-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000736.
8
The education and training of future physicians: why coaches can't be judges.未来医生的教育与培训:为何教练不能成为裁判。
JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):993-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1232.
9
Impact of a competency-based curriculum on medical student advancement: a ten-year analysis.基于能力的课程对医学生进步的影响:十年分析。
Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jul-Sep;23(3):207-14. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.586910.
10
Research paradigms in medical education research.医学教育研究中的研究范式。
Med Educ. 2010 Apr;44(4):358-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x.