Suppr超能文献

基于团队的学习(TBL)能否用于为英国医生提供输血医学研究生教育?

Can Team-Based Learning (TBL) Be Used to Deliver Postgraduate Education in Transfusion Medicine for UK Physicians?

作者信息

Graham Jane, Hayes Conrad, Pendry Kate

机构信息

Department of Clinical Haematology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QG UK.

School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 3;30(1):631-642. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00844-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is global need for evidence-based methodologies to effectively deliver transfusion training. This research critically assesses both efficacy and the practicalities of introducing team-based learning (TBL) to deliver transfusion medicine education to UK postgraduate doctors (residency equivalence).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

One TBL orientation session and three transfusion medicine sessions, mapped to the 2012 Foundation Programme curriculum, were designed adhering to TBL principles. These were delivered by one tutor during 'compulsory' (except rota commitments and leave) educational sessions. Team continuity plus trainee reaction, knowledge acquisition and behaviour were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-eight doctors received a mean 2.5 TBL sessions. Five teams were developed with average team membership of 5.85 doctors per session. Overall team continuity (total team members attending/potential team members × 100) was 65% over the four sessions. Qualitative and quantitative trainee reaction to TBL was positive. Objective knowledge acquisition showed improved team knowledge over individual knowledge. Mean team readiness assurance testing (RAT) score exceeded maximum individual RAT score in 90% of cases. Subjective knowledge acquisition significantly improved, although confidence concerning prescribing declined. The reported time spent preparing for sessions correlated with enjoyment, subjective knowledge gain and clinical confidence. Preparation time was reported as 'adequate' or 'excellent' in 86% of anonymous feedback.

CONCLUSION

TBL is an enjoyable and effective approach to deliver transfusion education to doctors, particularly when preparation is adequate. Team continuity is poor despite 'compulsory' education sessions. This must be considered when designing and delivering TBL sessions in the UK postgraduate medical setting.

摘要

背景

全球都需要基于证据的方法来有效开展输血培训。本研究严格评估了引入基于团队的学习(TBL)为英国研究生医生(等同于住院医师)提供输血医学教育的有效性和实用性。

研究设计与方法

根据TBL原则,设计了一次TBL入门课程和三次输血医学课程,这些课程与2012年基础课程相匹配。由一名导师在“必修”(除排班任务和请假外)教育课程中授课。评估了团队连续性以及学员的反应、知识获取和行为。

结果

48名医生平均接受了2.5次TBL课程。共组建了5个团队,每次课程平均团队成员为5.85名医生。在这四次课程中,总体团队连续性(实际参加的团队成员总数/潜在团队成员总数×100)为65%。学员对TBL的定性和定量反应均为积极。客观知识获取方面,团队知识比个人知识有所提高。在90%的案例中,团队准备度保证测试(RAT)的平均得分超过了个人RAT的最高得分。主观知识获取有显著改善,尽管处方开具方面的信心有所下降。报告的准备课程所花费的时间与学习乐趣、主观知识收获和临床信心相关。在86%的匿名反馈中,准备时间被报告为“充足”或“非常好”。

结论

TBL是一种为医生提供输血教育的有趣且有效的方法,尤其是在准备充分时。尽管是“必修”教育课程,但团队连续性较差。在英国研究生医学环境中设计和开展TBL课程时必须考虑这一点。

相似文献

1
Can Team-Based Learning (TBL) Be Used to Deliver Postgraduate Education in Transfusion Medicine for UK Physicians?
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 3;30(1):631-642. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00844-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Use of Team-Based Learning Pedagogy for Internal Medicine Ambulatory Resident Teaching.
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):643-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00790.1.
4
How we implemented team-based learning for postgraduate doctors.
Med Teach. 2014 Mar;36(3):191-5. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.875617. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
5
Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study.
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Sep 11;13:124. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-124.
6
Team-based learning in a pathology residency training program.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jul;142(1):23-8. doi: 10.1309/AJCPB8T1DZKCMWUT.
9
Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL?
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z.
10
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge assessment of Tunisian junior doctors in transfusion medicine.
Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2484166. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2484166. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Junior doctors' perspectives on transfusion education in Australia.
Vox Sang. 2018 May 8. doi: 10.1111/vox.12654.
2
Improving transfusion education for junior doctors; exploring UK experiences.
Transfus Med. 2017 Apr;27(2):96-104. doi: 10.1111/tme.12373. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
3
4
The long-term impact of team-based learning on medical students' team performance scores and on their peer evaluation scores.
Med Teach. 2016 Oct;38(10):1017-1024. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1147537. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
8
Assessing transfusion competency in junior doctors: a retrospective cohort study.
Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):128-36. doi: 10.1111/trf.12274. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
9
Evaluating medical interns' knowledge of common blood transfusion complications.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Apr;48(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
10
Team-based learning: a practical guide: Guide Supplement 65.1--viewpoint 1.
Med Teach. 2013;35(2):163-5. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.759199. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验